Debt Capital Markets interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

45

Firms

26

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsTSTruist Securities5PIMCO4TD Securities4Apollo Global Management3Nomura3Scotiabank3Bain Capital2Houlihan Lokey2Mizuho2Neuberger Berman2Oaktree Capital Management2RCRBC Capital Markets2Carlyle Group1Deutsche Bank1Golub Capital1HPS Investment Partners1Invesco1KKR1Lazard1Moelis & Company1Moody's1Northern Trust1NUNuveen1Rothschild & Co1S&P Global1Wells Fargo Securities1

Topic

All topicsBond mechanics11Duration and convexity6Yield curve and rates5Credit spreads5Credit analysis and ratings13Credit modelling9Primary issuance9Syndication and loans10Structured credit7Covenants and documentation5Liability management5Indian debt markets7Fit8

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalBrainteaserMarket viewCaseFit

1. 065Why would a sponsor prefer high yield bonds over bank debt to finance an LBO?Syndication and loansIntermediatetechnicalLazardGeneralist · Amsterdam · 2025

   Say this

   Flexibility and certainty of cost, paid for with a higher coupon. High yield gives you a longer bullet maturity, no maintenance covenants, a fixed rate, and a much larger investor base — so no amortisation draining cash and no quarterly covenant test to trip during the J-curve.

   Then walk it

   1. No amortisation. A bond is a bullet, so all the operating cash flow stays in the business to fund growth or bolt-ons, rather than paying down principal on a bank schedule. For a sponsor running a five-year hold, that is worth real IRR.
   2. Incurrence rather than maintenance covenants. You only test ratios when you actively do something — raise debt, pay a dividend, make an acquisition. There is no quarterly leverage test to breach because of a bad quarter, which removes the risk of handing control to lenders early in the hold.
   3. Fixed rate. In a rising rate environment a fixed coupon locks the cost of capital for the whole hold, whereas a floating rate loan leaves the interest bill exposed. Borrowers who financed floating at 2021 spreads found out exactly what that meant in 2023.
   4. Longer tenor and bigger market. Bonds run 7 to 10 years against 7 for a TLB and 5 for a TLA, and the bond buyer base is far deeper for very large quantum. A 5 billion dollar financing may need bonds simply because the loan market cannot absorb it all.
   5. The cost of all this: a higher coupon, typically 100 to 250 basis points over the equivalent loan, plus hard call protection. That is the real trade — you pay more and you lose the right to refinance cheaply when the credit improves.
   6. Which is why most sponsors do both. A TLB for the prepayable, cheaper portion and a senior secured or unsecured bond for the covenant-light, long-dated portion. The optimal split depends on which market is open and how fast they expect to deleverage.

   Where candidates lose it

   Answering 'because bonds are cheaper'. They are not — they are more expensive. The reasons are covenant flexibility, no amortisation, fixed cost and tenor. Getting the direction of pricing wrong here is fatal on a leveraged finance desk.

   Expect next

   • So what does the sponsor give up?
   • Why does a sponsor use both a TLB and bonds?
   • Where does private credit fit into that choice now?

   Reported by candidates at Lazard (Generalist, Amsterdam, 2025). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.