Debt Capital Markets interview preparation
Bond mechanics, duration, credit spreads, ratings, primary issuance, syndicated loans, structured credit, covenants and liability management, plus the Indian debt market. Every question is either traced to a named firm from a public candidate report, or tagged at desk level when we could not trace it.
100 questions, mapped to the firms that asked them
- Questions
- 100
- Traced to a firm
- 45
- Firms
- 26
- Updated
- September 2026
005A bond has a 6 percent coupon, 5 years to maturity, and trades at 95. Roughly what is the yield? Do it in your head.Syndicate desks
Say this
About 7.2 percent. Coupon income is 6 on 95, so 6.3 percent, plus 5 points of pull to par spread over 5 years, which is about 1 point a year or another 1.05 percent on a 95 price. Add them and you get roughly 7.3, and the true answer is 7.2.
Then walk it
- The approximation is the coupon plus the annualised capital gain, all over the average of price and par. That is the standard back-of-envelope yield.
- Formally: 6 plus 5 over 5, so 7, divided by the average of 95 and 100, which is 97.5. That gives 7.18 percent.
- The reason the shortcut slightly overstates is discounting: the pull to par arrives at the end, so its present value is less than a point a year.
- Sanity check the direction first. It trades below par, so the yield must be above the 6 percent coupon. Getting the direction wrong is fatal; being 10 basis points out is not.
- The desk habit worth showing: quote it as roughly 7.2 and say you would price it exactly on the calculator. Interviewers want the instinct plus the discipline, not false precision.
Where candidates lose it
Reaching for a calculator, or freezing. This is a mental arithmetic test dressed as a bond question. State the direction first, then the approximation, then say you would confirm it precisely. Never quote a number to three decimals from a mental estimate.
Expect next
- Now do it for a bond trading at 105.
- What if it had 20 years to maturity instead of 5?
- What is the duration of that bond, roughly?
015Two bonds have the same maturity but different coupons. Which has the longer duration, and why?Fixed income asset management
Say this
The lower coupon bond. Duration is the present-value-weighted average time to the cash flows, and a low coupon puts proportionally more of the value in the final principal payment, which is the most distant cash flow.
Then walk it
- Think of the weights. A 10-year 8 percent bond returns a lot of cash early, so the weighted average time is pulled forward. A 10-year 2 percent bond has almost all its value in the redemption at year 10.
- The limiting case proves it: a zero-coupon bond has no early cash flows at all, so its duration equals its maturity, which is the maximum possible for that tenor.
- Numbers: at a 5 percent yield, a 10-year 8 percent coupon bond has Macaulay duration around 7.1, a 4 percent coupon around 7.9, and the zero is 10.0.
- The same logic explains the other two drivers. Longer maturity extends the weighting, and a lower yield reduces the discounting of distant cash flows, so both lengthen duration.
- The practical consequence: low-coupon long-dated bonds issued in the zero-rate era carry enormous duration, which is why the 2022 rate move produced 40 percent-plus drawdowns on some sovereign long bonds.
- One qualification: this holds for bullets. A callable low-coupon bond may have shorter effective duration than the maths suggests, because the option truncates it.
Where candidates lose it
Guessing. It is a two-way question and half of candidates answer higher coupon because they think more cash flow means more sensitivity. Go back to the weighted-average-time definition and the zero-coupon limiting case, and the answer is forced.
Expect next
- So what is the maximum duration a 10-year bond can have?
- What if one of them is callable?
- Why did long sovereign bonds fall so hard in 2022?
092Roughly how large is India's outstanding corporate bond market? Reason it out.Indian debt capital marketsCredit research
Say this
Around 50 to 55 lakh crore rupees, so roughly 600 to 650 billion dollars, which is a bit under 20 percent of GDP. Get there from GDP: India's GDP is about 330 lakh crore rupees, and the corporate bond market has been running in the high teens as a share of it.
Then walk it
- Anchor on GDP first, because it is the number you are most likely to know: about 330 lakh crore rupees, or roughly 4 trillion dollars.
- Then the ratio. Bank credit to the commercial sector in India is roughly 50 to 55 percent of GDP, and the corporate bond market is well under half that. High teens as a percentage of GDP gets you to 50 to 60 lakh crore.
- Cross-check with the issuance flow. Annual private placement issuance has been running around 8 to 10 lakh crore rupees, and with an average tenor of roughly five years, the steady-state outstanding stock is five times annual issuance, which lands you in the same 40 to 50 lakh crore region. Two independent routes agreeing is the point of the exercise.
- Comparison for scale: the US corporate bond market is over 100 percent of GDP, and even Malaysia and Korea run far higher ratios than India. So India is an outlier low, which is the substance behind the depth problem.
- Composition matters as much as size: the large majority is private placement rather than public issue, and financial sector issuers are a very large share of it. So the genuine non-financial corporate bond market is a good deal smaller than the headline.
- And be honest about the range. I would quote it as roughly 50 lakh crore, say which year, and say I would confirm from the SEBI or RBI data rather than pretend to a precise figure.
Where candidates lose it
Guessing a number with no derivation. The estimation route is what is being marked, so anchor on GDP, apply a ratio, then cross-check against issuance flow times average tenor. And use consistent units — mixing lakh crore and billions of dollars mid-answer loses the interviewer.
Expect next
- How does that compare to bank credit in India?
- Why is it so much smaller than the US market?
- How much of it is financial sector issuance?
Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.
