Derivatives Foundation interview preparation
The full derivatives syllabus from no-arbitrage pricing through the Greeks, the volatility surface, swaps, CDS and clearing, plus the Indian index-options market. Every question is either traced to a named firm from a public candidate report, or tagged at desk level when we could not trace it - we do not invent attributions.
100 questions, mapped to the firms that asked them
- Questions
- 100
- Traced to a firm
- 29
- Firms
- 19
- Updated
- September 2026
056Given a portfolio of three bonds, explain how the portfolio changes if duration increases.PIMCOGeneralist · Los Angeles · 2026
Say this
Portfolio duration is the market-value-weighted average of the individual durations, so if it increases you have become more exposed to rates — you gain more when yields fall and lose more when they rise. The question is which lever moved it: the weights, a change in the bonds themselves, or a shift in yields.
Then walk it
- Start with the arithmetic. Say a 2-year at 30 percent weight with duration 1.9, a 10-year at 40 percent with duration 8.2, and a 30-year at 30 percent with duration 19. Portfolio duration is 0.57 plus 3.28 plus 5.7, about 9.6 years.
- Shift 10 percent from the 2-year into the 30-year and duration goes to about 11.3. So the sensitivity per 100 basis points has gone from 9.6 percent of value to 11.3 — you have added roughly 1.7 percent of NAV per 100 basis point move.
- Duration can also rise without you trading. Yields falling raises duration mechanically, and the long bond's weight in the portfolio grows because it rallied most. So a bull market in bonds lengthens your duration passively, which is a real drift risk in an unmanaged book.
- The long bond dominates. It is 30 percent of the money and nearly 60 percent of the risk, and that concentration is the first thing I would point out. Weighting by market value tells you nothing about where the risk sits; dollar duration does.
- Convexity rises too, and non-linearly, so the portfolio becomes more asymmetric: better in a large rally than duration predicts, better than a shorter portfolio in a large selloff too, relative to its own duration.
- Two limitations to volunteer. First, averaging durations assumes a parallel shift — this portfolio is really a bet on the whole curve, and a flattening would hurt the 30-year and help the 2-year regardless of the average. Second, if any bond has credit risk, the spread duration is a separate exposure, and in a selloff spreads and rates often move together.
Where candidates lose it
Answering qualitatively — 'more rate sensitive' — without doing the weighted average. Put numbers on it, then make the two real points: the long bond carries most of the risk despite a modest weight, and duration drifts upward on its own in a rally. That is what a fixed income manager wants to hear.
Expect next
- Which bond carries most of the risk, and is that what the weights suggest?
- How would you bring the duration back down without selling the long bond?
- What if the curve flattens instead of shifting in parallel?
Reported by candidates at PIMCO (Generalist, Los Angeles, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.

