Case 053Forecasting and modellingHard
Design a model to forecast three years of rental income for Stavrina Office REIT, whose in-place rents sit below market. Build it and name the drivers you would test.
1The situation
Stavrina Office REIT owns 20 million sq ft of leasable office space, 86% occupied. Tenants pay an average in-place rent of Rs 90 per sq ft a month; comparable space leases today at Rs 105. Each year 15% of the leased area reaches the end of its lease. Leases carry a contractual escalation of 15% every three years, and the portfolio's escalation dates are spread evenly.
You assume market rent grows 4% a year, that expiring space is re-let at the market rent of the year it expires, and that occupancy rises to 87.5%, 89% and 90% as vacant floors are leased at market.
2Your task
Lay out the model's structure, forecast rental income for three years, and name the drivers you would stress before trusting it.
Quick check
Rent today is Rs 90 against a market of Rs 105. How fast does that 16.7% gap flow into income?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Rental income of about Rs 1,939 crore, Rs 2,104 crore and Rs 2,265 crore in years 1 to 3, from a run-rate of Rs 1,858 crore today. The model splits the book into leases that expire and are marked to market, leases that stay and escalate, and vacant space that is leased up. Market rent on re-letting, retention and occupancy are the drivers to stress.
Step 1What is the structure of the model before any number goes in?
Picture a landlord with ten flats on old leases at Rs 20,000 while new tenants pay Rs 24,000. His income does not jump to Rs 24,000 a flat tomorrow; it rises one flat at a time as leases end. A REIT model is that landlord's notebook at scale: each year you split the occupied area into three pieces, the part that expires, the part that stays, and the vacant part that gets leased. Expiring space is re-let at market rent, staying space gets its escalationA rent increase written into the lease, here 15% every three years, which the tenant pays whatever the market does., and new leasing comes in at market.
Today 17.2 million sq ft is occupied at Rs 90 a month, an annual run-rateWhat rent would total over twelve months if today’s leases stayed exactly as they are. of 17.2 million x 90 x 12, Rs 1,857.6 crore. Because escalation dates are spread evenly, a third of the staying book gets its 15% each year, which averages 5%. Income for a year is taken as the average of the opening and closing run-rate, since leases turn over through the year.
Step 2What do three years of the model produce?
| Year | Market rent, Rs | Expiring, m sq ft | Occupied, m sq ft | Avg rent at year end, Rs | Run-rate, Rs crore | Income, Rs crore |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 17.20 | 90.0 | 1,857.6 | |||
| 1 | 105.0 | 2.58 | 17.50 | 96.2 | 2,020.8 | 1,939.2 |
| 2 | 109.2 | 2.62 | 17.80 | 102.4 | 2,186.8 | 2,103.8 |
| 3 | 113.6 | 2.67 | 18.00 | 108.5 | 2,342.9 | 2,264.9 |
The gap to market arrives only through expiries, not all at once: even after three years the book's average rent of Rs 108.5 is still below year 3's market of Rs 113.6. The market keeps moving while the book catches up. Notice too that the quiet line, escalations, adds more than the headline gap: Rs 258 crore against Rs 123 crore over three years.
Step 3Which drivers would you stress, and by how much do they move the answer?
Stress the three assumptions a leasing team can get wrong. If market rent stays flat at Rs 105 instead of rising 4%, year 3 income is Rs 2,236 crore. If occupancy stays at 86%, it is Rs 2,170 crore. If 30% of expiring tenants leave and their space sits empty for six months, year 3 is Rs 2,210 crore. Occupancy is the largest single swing, which is why the first question on any office REIT is how much of the vacancy is actually being negotiated.
Say the limitation too. This model treats the market rent as one number, but a portfolio has buildings in different micro-markets with different gaps, and a real model runs the same logic building by building. The structure stays the same; only the rows multiply.
Where candidates lose it
The frequent loss is applying the Rs 105 market rent to the whole book in year 1, which overstates income by about 15% and shows the interviewer you have forgotten that leases are contracts.
The other is treating the mark-to-market gap as permanent upside. The market rent can fall, and tenants who leave at expiry create downtime that the gap never pays for.
What the interviewer asks next
- Market rent falls to Rs 95. What happens to the expiring tranches and to year 1 income?
- How would you model a tenant who holds 12% of the area and expires in year 2?
- Which of these drivers would you expect the REIT's manager to be most optimistic about, and why?
Asked at Two Sigma, Quantitative Research, New York, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): One is like model design- predict rent prices in Manhattan
Company names and figures are illustrative.
