Equity Research interview preparation
Sell side and buy side. Every question is either traced to a named firm from a public candidate report, or tagged at desk level when we could not trace it. Answers lead with the point, then the mechanism, then the limitation.
100 questions, mapped to the firms that asked them
- Questions
- 100
- Traced to a firm
- 72
- Firms
- 45
- Updated
- September 2026
001How would you analyse a stock?JefferiesEquity Research · New York · 2026
Say this
Business first, then numbers, then price. Understand how the company makes money and whether that is durable, build a model of what it earns, then decide whether the current price already reflects it.
Then walk it
- Start with the business: what it sells, to whom, what share of revenue comes from where, and who it competes with. You cannot forecast what you cannot describe.
- Then the economics: unit economics, gross margin, operating leverage, return on invested capital, and where the cash actually goes.
- Then the durability question: what stops a competitor doing this? Switching costs, scale, network effects, regulation, brand. That determines whether today's margin survives.
- Then the model: forecast revenue by driver rather than by growth rate, build margin off the cost structure, and get to earnings and free cash flow.
- Then valuation and, critically, expectations. The key move in research is not 'what is it worth' but 'what is priced in'. I would reverse-engineer the current price into implied growth and margin, then ask whether I believe those numbers.
- The output is a rating, a target, and a variant view. Without a variant view there is no reason for anyone to read the note.
Where candidates lose it
Describing a valuation process rather than a research process. Anyone can build a DCF. The job is forming a differentiated view against consensus, so the expectations step has to appear in your answer.
Expect next
- What moves a stock?
- What is your variant view on that name?
- How do you know what is priced in?
Reported by candidates at Jefferies (Equity Research, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
079Walk me through the three statements and tell me which one you would want if you could only have one.Moody'sGeneralist · New York · 2022JefferiesEquity Research · New York · 2026
Say this
The cash flow statement. It is the hardest to manipulate, it tells you whether the reported profit is real, and it shows you the capital allocation decisions, which reveal what management actually believes.
Then walk it
- The linkage first: net income flows from the income statement to the top of the cash flow statement and into retained earnings; ending cash flows onto the balance sheet.
- Why cash flow: it reconciles accounting judgement back to something verifiable. Starting from net income and adjusting to cash, it exposes the accruals in between.
- It also contains the investing and financing sections, so you see CapEx, acquisitions, buybacks, dividends and debt movements. That is the capital allocation record in one page.
- The honest caveat: the cash flow statement alone does not tell you whether the business is profitable, what the margin structure is, or how leveraged the balance sheet is. You would be flying with one instrument.
- And it can be managed at the margin: classifying items between operating and investing, timing payments around the period end, and factoring receivables all flatter operating cash flow.
- But among the three, it is the one where the gap between reality and presentation is smallest, which is why it is the right answer.
Where candidates lose it
Picking the income statement because it shows profit. The expected answer is cash flow, and more importantly the reason: accounting profit involves judgement and cash largely does not. Give the caveat too, since the question is testing judgement, not recall.
Expect next
- What can still be manipulated in the cash flow statement?
- What would you miss without the balance sheet?
- How do you assess earnings quality from it?
Reported by candidates at Moody's (Generalist, New York, 2022); Jefferies (Equity Research, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.

