Case 013Financing, capital structure and treasuryCore
A logistics company wants to buy a business for Rs 800 crore. Should it pay with cash, debt, new shares or a mix, given a 3.0x leverage covenant?
1The situation
Gauravpath Logistics earns EBITDA of Rs 400 crore and net income of Rs 200 crore. It has 20 crore shares trading at Rs 180, so EPS is Rs 10.00 and the P/E is 18. Net debt is Rs 900 crore, after Rs 300 crore of cash that earns 6% before tax. New debt would cost 9%, tax is 25%, and its loan agreement caps net debt at 3.0x EBITDA.
It wants to buy a warehousing business with EBITDA of Rs 80 crore and net income of Rs 50 crore for Rs 800 crore. The options: Rs 300 crore of cash plus Rs 500 crore of debt; Rs 800 crore of debt; Rs 800 crore of new shares at Rs 180; or Rs 300 crore of cash plus Rs 500 crore of new shares.
2Your task
Compare EPS and leverage under each mix, and recommend one.
Quick check
Measured by net debt to EBITDA, how does paying with Rs 300 crore of cash compare with borrowing Rs 300 crore?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Recommend Rs 300 crore of cash plus Rs 500 crore of new shares: EPS rises 3.8% to Rs 10.38 and leverage stays at 2.50x. Both debt-heavy mixes take net debt to 3.54x, a covenant breach, and all-debt also dilutes EPS because debt costs 6.75% after tax against a 6.25% earnings yield on the target. At a P/E of 18, Gauravpath's shares are its cheapest currency.
Step 1What does each currency cost?
Price each source in the same unit: after-tax cost per rupee. Cash costs the interest it stops earning, 6% before tax and 4.5% after; new debt costs 9% before tax and 6.75% after; new shares cost the acquirer's earnings yieldEarnings per share divided by share price, the inverse of the P/E. A P/E of 18 is an earnings yield of 5.56%., 1 over 18, or 5.56%. The target earns Rs 50 crore on Rs 800 crore, 6.25%. Any currency cheaper than 6.25% lifts EPS; any dearer cuts it. A shopkeeper who funds a new counter from savings, a bank loan or a partner faces the same three prices.
Step 2How does each mix land on EPS and leverage?
Work one fully. Cash plus shares: net income is Rs 200 crore plus Rs 50 crore, less Rs 13.5 crore of interest income given up, Rs 236.5 crore; shares rise by Rs 500 crore divided by Rs 180, 2.78 crore, to 22.78 crore. EPS is Rs 10.38, up 3.8%, and net debt is Rs 1,200 crore on Rs 480 crore of EBITDA, 2.50x. All debt is the only mix that dilutes, because Rs 54 crore of after-tax interest exceeds the Rs 50 crore the target earns.
| Funding mix | Net income | Shares, crore | EPS, Rs | vs 10.00 | Net debt / EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash 300 + debt 500 | 202.8 | 20.00 | 10.14 | +1.4% | 3.54x |
| All debt, 800 | 196.0 | 20.00 | 9.80 | -2.0% | 3.54x |
| All new shares, 800 | 250.0 | 24.44 | 10.23 | +2.3% | 1.88x |
| Cash 300 + shares 500 | 236.5 | 22.78 | 10.38 | +3.8% | 2.50x |
Step 3Why is cash not the free option it looks like?
Because the covenant is written on net debt. Spending Rs 300 crore of cash raises net debt by Rs 300 crore, exactly as borrowing it would, so the covenant cannot tell the two apart. The covenant allows net debt of at most Rs 1,440 crore on combined EBITDA, room for Rs 540 crore more. Using all of it, Rs 300 crore of cash and Rs 240 crore of debt with Rs 260 crore of shares, sits exactly at 3.0x and gives EPS of Rs 10.27, less than cash plus shares, because debt is the dearest currency here.
Say what EPS leaves out. Issuing 2.78 crore shares gives new holders 12% of the company, and if the market thinks the shares are cheap at Rs 180, issuing them transfers value to the buyers. A company with headroom also wants a buffer below the covenant, not a balance sitting on it, because EBITDA can fall. The ranking flips if the P/E is low: at 10x, shares would cost 10% and debt would become the cheaper currency, provided the covenant leaves room.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates say use the cash first because it is cheapest, then borrow the rest, without checking the covenant. Both cash and debt raise net debt, and the result is a 3.54x company with a 3.0x limit.
The second miss is costing debt at 9% instead of 6.75% after tax, or costing equity at zero because no interest is paid. Equity costs its earnings yield, and here that makes it the cheapest source.
What the interviewer asks next
- At what share price would all-equity funding become dilutive?
- The lender offers to reset the covenant to 3.5x for a fee. Would you take it?
- How would a rating agency react to each mix?
Asked at Moody's, Generalist, New York, 2022 (Wall Street Oasis): is it better to raise debt equity or cash
Company names and figures are illustrative.
