Case 033Distress and restructuringHard
A power company's holding company owes Rs 1,000 crore and its operating company owes Rs 2,000 crore on Rs 2,400 crore of value. What do holdco creditors recover with no guarantee, and with an unsecured upstream guarantee?
1The situation
Shikharjyoti Power owns its plants through a single operating company. The operating company has Rs 2,000 crore of unsecured debt and, in a restructuring, an enterprise value of Rs 2,400 crore. The holding company owns 100% of the operating company and has Rs 1,000 crore of its own debt, with no other assets.
Consider two cases. In the first, holdco lenders have no claim on the operating company. In the second, the operating company has given an unsecured upstream guarantee of the holdco debt, ranking equally with its own unsecured creditors.
2Your task
Compute recoveries for both sets of creditors in each case, and explain what the guarantee changes.
Quick check
With the guarantee, what do the holdco creditors recover?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Without a guarantee holdco creditors recover 40%; with the guarantee they recover 80%, and opco creditors fall from 100% to 80%. Holdco owns only the operating company's equity, so it gets what is left after Rs 2,000 crore of opco debt: Rs 400 crore. The guarantee moves holdco lenders from the equity queue into the creditor queue, where Rs 2,400 crore is shared rateably over Rs 3,000 crore of claims.
Step 1Where do holdco creditors stand without a guarantee?
Behind everyone at the operating company. A parent that owns a shop owns what is left after the shop's suppliers are paid, nothing more. Holdco's only asset is its shares in the operating company, so holdco creditors are paid from the equity left after opco creditors are paid in full, which is structural subordinationCreditors of a parent rank behind creditors of its subsidiaries, because the parent owns only equity in them.. Rs 2,400 crore less Rs 2,000 crore leaves Rs 400 crore for Rs 1,000 crore of holdco debt: 40%.
Step 2What does the upstream guarantee change?
It gives holdco lenders a second door. An upstream guarantee makes the operating company itself liable for the holdco debt, so holdco lenders now claim at the operating company as creditors, not as owners of its equity. Because the guarantee is unsecured and ranks equally, Rs 2,000 crore of opco claims and Rs 1,000 crore of guarantee claims share Rs 2,400 crore in proportion: 80% each. The equity is now worth nothing, so nothing more reaches holdco through its shares.
| Case | OpCo claims | OpCo recovery | HoldCo claims | HoldCo recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No guarantee | 2,000 | 2,000 (100%) | 1,000 | 400 (40%) |
| Upstream guarantee, pari passu | 2,000 | 1,600 (80%) | 1,000 | 800 (80%) |
Step 3How does the answer move with the value of the business?
Trace both cases across a range of values, because the interviewer's follow-up is usually a different number. Without the guarantee, holdco gets nothing until value passes Rs 2,000 crore and full recovery at Rs 3,000 crore; with it, holdco recovers value over Rs 3,000 crore from the first rupee. The guarantee matters most when value is low, which is exactly when lenders need it.
Step 4What would a careful creditor ask next?
Three things. First, security: if opco debt were secured on the plants, it would be paid before the unsecured guarantee, and holdco would be back to about 40%. A guarantee is only as good as its rank at the guarantor. Second, enforceability: upstream guarantees can be challenged where the subsidiary received little in return, so lawyers test them under the governing law, and the current position should be confirmed rather than assumed. Third, limits: guarantees are often capped, and a capped guarantee gives a claim only up to the cap.
The view to close on: the same business can give a holdco lender 40% or 80% depending on one document, and opco lenders pay for that difference. That is why lenders at both levels read the guarantee package before the financials.
Where candidates lose it
The usual error is letting holdco creditors collect twice: 80% through the guarantee and then the equity on top. Once the guarantee claim is paid rateably, opco creditors are not paid in full, so the equity is worth nothing.
The second is forgetting that the guarantee hurts opco creditors. Value is fixed; the guarantee moves it, from 100% to 80% for opco lenders, and an interviewer will ask who pays.
What the interviewer asks next
- If the opco debt were secured on the plants, what would each group recover?
- How would a cap of Rs 500 crore on the guarantee change the numbers?
- Why might opco lenders agree to an upstream guarantee in the first place?
Asked at Houlihan Lokey, Restructuring, New York, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): Series of questions on structural subordination scenarios 2) Investor mindset questions on debt
Company names and figures are illustrative.
