Financial Analysis interview preparation

The three statements, working capital, ratios, forecasting, variance analysis, costing, capital budgeting, valuation and the modelling and Excel work that fills the day, plus the fit questions about why this seat. Every question is either traced to a named firm from a public candidate report, or tagged at desk level when we could not trace it — we do not invent attributions.

Jump to the question bank
Question bank

100 questions, mapped to the firms that asked them

Questions
100
Traced to a firm
42
Firms
28
Updated
September 2026
Asked at
All firmsMoody's7Bain Capital3State Street3Ares Management2BlackRock2D.E. Shaw2Morgan Stanley2Oaktree Capital Management2S&P Global2Bridgewater Associates1Citadel1Franklin Templeton1Golub Capital1Harris Williams1Houlihan Lokey1J.P. Morgan1Jane Street1Marshall Wace1Millennium Management1Morningstar1PIMCO1Sycamore Partners1Truist Securities1Two Sigma1Vanguard1Wellington Management1Wells Fargo Securities1Wolverine Trading1
Topic
All topicsThree statements9Accounting policy and standards5Working capital and cash7Ratio analysis8Forecasting and budgeting9Variance and management reporting7Unit economics and costing8Capital budgeting7Cost of capital and valuation7Markets and rates5Modelling, Excel and data8Business partnering6Brainteasers and estimation4Fit and career10
Level
AnyCoreIntermediateHard
Type
AnyTechnicalCaseBrainteaserMarket viewFit
Showing 1–1 of 1 · filtered from 100Clear filters
  1. 059What is better: a one rupee increase in EBITDA or a one rupee decrease in debt?Capital budgetingIntermediatetechnicalAres ManagementPrivate Equity · New York · 2026

    Say this

    The EBITDA rupee, as long as it is recurring, because it is capitalised at the multiple. At eight times EBITDA, one rupee of extra EBITDA adds eight rupees of enterprise value and therefore eight of equity value. One rupee less debt adds exactly one rupee of equity value.

    Then walk it

    1. The arithmetic: equity value equals EBITDA times the multiple, less net debt. Differentiate on each term. A rupee of EBITDA is worth the multiple; a rupee of debt repayment is worth one, rupee for rupee.
    2. So at any multiple above one times, which is every real business, EBITDA wins on value. At eight times it wins eight to one.
    3. But the answer depends on the word recurring. A one-off rupee of EBITDA is worth one rupee, not eight, and the whole question is whether a buyer will capitalise it. That is why sponsors fight over which addbacks are run-rate.
    4. Then the cases where debt reduction wins. If you are close to a covenant breach, the rupee that keeps you compliant is worth far more than its face value, because a breach can cost you the company. Same if you are facing a refinancing wall in a shut credit market.
    5. There is also a second-order effect in favour of EBITDA: higher EBITDA lowers leverage on the same debt, which can reduce the interest margin on a ratchet and improve the rating. So EBITDA improves both terms and debt repayment improves only one.
    6. So my answer is EBITDA, by the multiple, with the caveat that it has to be recurring and that liquidity risk trumps value arithmetic when you are near a covenant.

    Where candidates lose it

    Answering 'they are the same, one rupee is one rupee'. The point is that EBITDA is capitalised and debt repayment is not. But an answer with no caveat is also weak: near a covenant breach, deleveraging genuinely wins.

    Expect next

    • At what multiple would you be indifferent?
    • What if the EBITDA improvement is a one-off?
    • How does a leverage ratchet change your answer?

    Reported by candidates at Ares Management (Private Equity, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.