Financial Analysis interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

42

Firms

28

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsMoody's7Bain Capital3SSState Street3AMAres Management2BLBlackRock2DED.E. Shaw2MSMorgan Stanley2Oaktree Capital Management2S&P Global2Bridgewater Associates1Citadel1FTFranklin Templeton1Golub Capital1HWHarris Williams1Houlihan Lokey1J.P. Morgan1Jane Street1MWMarshall Wace1Millennium Management1Morningstar1PIMCO1Sycamore Partners1TSTruist Securities1Two Sigma1Vanguard1WMWellington Management1Wells Fargo Securities1Wolverine Trading1

Topic

All topicsThree statements9Accounting policy and standards5Working capital and cash7Ratio analysis8Forecasting and budgeting9Variance and management reporting7Unit economics and costing8Capital budgeting7Cost of capital and valuation7Markets and rates5Modelling, Excel and data8Business partnering6Brainteasers and estimation4Fit and career10

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseBrainteaserMarket viewFit

1. 093What do you know about our ratings business, and why the credit ratings sector?Fit and careerIntermediatefirst roundS&P GlobalGeneralist · London · 2018

   Say this

   Know the business model before you answer the motivation. Ratings is an issuer-paid opinion business with enormous franchise value and a regulatory role, and the work is deep, sector-based credit analysis over years rather than transaction sprints. Say why that suits you specifically.

   Then walk it

   1. The business: issuers pay for a rating because it lowers their cost of capital by making the credit comparable to investors. Revenue is transaction-linked on new issuance plus recurring surveillance fees, and the second part is why it is a more stable business than banking.
   2. So the honest 'why the sector' answer is about the work. You cover a portfolio of issuers in a sector for years, you build a genuine view of an industry, and your output is a defended opinion in front of a committee rather than a pitchbook.
   3. The committee process is the thing to mention, because it is distinctive: you write the analysis, you present it to a rating committee, and you have to defend the judgement against colleagues. If you like being argued with, that is a real reason to want the job.
   4. Then add the honest trade-off, which shows you are choosing rather than applying everywhere. Ratings pays less than banking and moves more slowly. What you get is depth, sane hours and a seat where analytical quality is the product.
   5. Show you know the constraints too: the issuer-paid conflict of interest and why it is managed by separating commercial and analytical roles, and the regulatory framework, in India SEBI-registered agencies and globally the post-2008 rules.
   6. And name one thing about this specific firm: the sectors they are strongest in, a methodology they publish, or their India business. Saying 'you publish your methodologies and I read the one on the sector I want to cover' is worth more than any general enthusiasm.

   Where candidates lose it

   Treating ratings as a banking consolation prize, which interviewers hear instantly. Explain the issuer-paid model and the committee process, and give a positive reason that fits ratings and not banking, which is depth over deal flow.

   Expect next

   • How is the conflict of interest in issuer-paid ratings managed?
   • Which sector would you want to cover and why?
   • What is the difference between a rating and a recommendation?

   Reported by candidates at S&P Global (Generalist, London, 2018). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.