Case 011Short sellingCore
Helmor Infra doubled revenue from Rs 2,000 crore to Rs 4,000 crore in three years while receivable days rose from 60 to 140 and operating cash flow fell to about 20% of EBITDA. Build the short case from the working capital.
1The situation
Helmor Infra builds roads and water projects for state agencies and private developers. Over three years revenue has doubled from Rs 2,000 crore to Rs 4,000 crore, with an EBITDA margin steady at 20%. The stock has tripled and trades at a premium to peers on the growth.
Receivable days, trade receivables divided by revenue times 365, have climbed steadily from 60 to 140. Cash taxes and interest run at about 2.3% of revenue. In the latest year, cash flow from operations was only about a fifth of EBITDA. Management says its customers are slow but sound.
2Your task
Use the working capital to build the short case: what the numbers say, what could explain them innocently, and what would make the short work.
Quick check
If Helmor still collected in 60 days, how large would receivables be at Rs 4,000 crore of revenue?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Most of Helmor's reported growth has not turned into cash: receivables have grown from about Rs 329 crore to Rs 1,534 crore, about Rs 877 crore more than the old 60 day pattern would carry. Operating cash flow was flat at about Rs 160 to 180 crore a year while EBITDA rose to Rs 800 crore. The short case is that revenue is being booked faster than customers will pay, and that either write-offs or an equity raise will follow.
Step 1What do the receivables say about the quality of the growth?
A tailor who doubles his orders by letting every customer pay in five months instead of two has more sales and less money in the drawer. Revenue is a claim to cash, and receivable days measure how long that claim takes to become cash; at 140 days, a third of a year's sales sits unpaid on Helmor's balance sheet. Run the numbers year by year. Receivables go from about Rs 329 crore to Rs 1,534 crore while revenue only doubles. At the old 60 days, Rs 4,000 crore of revenue would need only about Rs 658 crore of receivables.
| Year | Revenue | Receivable days | Receivables | EBITDA | Cash from operations | Cash / EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 0 | 2,000 | 60 | 329 | |||
| Year 1 | 2,520 | 87 | 598 | 504 | 176 | 35% |
| Year 2 | 3,175 | 113 | 986 | 635 | 174 | 27% |
| Year 3 | 4,000 | 140 | 1,534 | 800 | 160 | 20% |
Step 2Where did the EBITDA go?
Follow year three's rupees. Of Rs 800 crore of EBITDA, the rise in receivables absorbed Rs 548 crore and tax and interest another Rs 92 crore, leaving Rs 160 crore of operating cash, 20% of EBITDA. Over three years Helmor reported Rs 1,939 crore of EBITDA and collected Rs 510 crore of operating cash, 26%. A contractor growing this fast also needs cash for equipment, so the gap is almost certainly being funded by debt or will need new equity.
Step 3What is the innocent explanation, and how do you test it?
Government agencies do pay late, and contractors book unbilled revenueWork done and recognised as revenue but not yet invoiced to the customer, usually because a milestone has not been certified. on long projects before a milestone is certified. The test is whether the receivables are ageing: split them by customer and by age, compare billed with unbilled, and check whether the same large balances appear year after year. Read the auditor's notes on expected credit losses and any related party customers. If a few customers owe most of the balance and those balances keep rolling, the growth is being manufactured at the revenue line.
Then give the portfolio manager the trade, not just the thesis. The catalyst is whatever forces the cash question: an equity raise, a rating agency review of the debt, a write-off, or an auditor qualification. The risks are real. Shorts in a stock that has tripled get squeezed, borrow can be scarce, and a large collection from a state agency can reset the numbers in one quarter. Size it small, set the stop in advance, and add only when the cash flow statement confirms the view rather than when the price moves.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates build the short on revenue growth being too fast or the valuation too high. That is an opinion. The receivable days and the cash conversion are evidence, and a short without evidence gets squeezed.
The second miss is skipping the innocent explanation. An interviewer will say government customers always pay late, and the answer has to be the test that separates slow from fictitious: ageing, concentration and billed against unbilled.
What the interviewer asks next
- Helmor sells Rs 500 crore of receivables to a bank at the year end. What does that do to the numbers, and to your thesis?
- What would you want to see in the next quarter to cover the short?
- How is shorting Helmor different from shorting a company on valuation alone?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
