Case 032Manager evaluation and attributionCore
The stock you pitched in a case competition, Selvora Chemicals, fell 22% in the six months after. The market fell 5%, the chemicals sector 8%, and Selvora's beta to the sector is 1.1. How much of the fall was your thesis, and how do you talk about it in an interview?
1The situation
Six months ago you pitched a long on Selvora Chemicals in a case competition. The thesis was that a new specialty plant would lift margins and that the market was valuing Selvora as a commodity producer. Since then Selvora has fallen 22%. The broad market fell 5% and the chemicals sector index fell 8% over the same period.
Selvora's beta to the sector index is 1.1, and the sector's beta to the market is about 1. The plant started three months late, and one large customer delayed its orders. Your interviewer has read your pitch and asks what happened to the stock.
2Your task
Split the 22% fall into market, sector and stock-specific parts. How much of it belongs to your thesis, and how do you tell the story in the room?
Quick check
Roughly how much of Selvora's fall was specific to Selvora?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
The sector explains about 8.8 points of the 22% fall, so about 13.2 points were specific to Selvora, and that is the part your thesis owns. Of the 8.8, 5.5 came from the market and 3.3 from chemicals doing worse than the market. In the interview, give the split first, name the assumption that failed, then say whether you would own the stock at today's price and what you now do differently.
Step 1How do you separate your thesis from the market?
A student whose marks fall 20% in a year when the whole class fell 10% did worse than the class, but not 20 points worse. To judge a stock pick, strip out the part of the move that the market and the sector would have delivered anyway, scaled by how sensitive the stock is to them; what is left is the part your thesis is answerable for. Selvora's betaHow much a stock tends to move for each 1% move in a benchmark. A beta of 1.1 means it has tended to move 1.1% for every 1% the benchmark moves. to the sector is 1.1, so an 8% sector fall explains 1.1 x 8 = 8.8 points. The residual, 22.0 minus 8.8, is 13.2 points.
| Part of the fall | Calculation | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Market | 1.1 x sector's market part of -5% | -5.5 |
| Sector beyond the market | 1.1 x (-8% - (-5%)) | -3.3 |
| Explained by the sector | 1.1 x -8% | -8.8 |
| Selvora-specific | -22.0 - (-8.8) | -13.2 |
| Total | -22.0 |
Step 2Why does the beta matter, and where does it stop helping?
Without the beta you would subtract the sector's 8% and call 14 points your own; with it you call 13.2. The difference is small here, but on a high-beta name in a bad tape it can be the whole story. A beta is an estimate from past data, so treat the 13.2-point residual as roughly 13, not as a precise measure of your error. On a Rs 10 crore position, that residual is about Rs 1.32 crore of loss that no hedge on the sector would have saved.
Step 3How do you tell the story in the room?
Interviewers ask about an old pitch to see whether you can own an outcome without excuses and without collapsing. Use four steps. First the split: about 9 points were the sector, about 13 were Selvora. Second, the assumption that failed: the plant was three months late and a large customer delayed orders, so the margin step-up you expected in the second half has not arrived yet. Third, and the step most people skip, re-underwrite from today's price: is the thesis delayed or broken? If the plant is now running and the customer's orders are deferred rather than lost, the thesis is delayed and the lower price may make it more interesting. If the customer has moved to a rival, it is broken.
Fourth, what you would do differently: size the position for the plant-delay risk you underweighted, and set a check-in date tied to the plant's start rather than to the share price. A candidate who says the market fell has answered about 9 points of a 22-point question. One who owns the 13 points, explains them and says what they learned sounds like someone a portfolio manager can trust with capital.
Where candidates lose it
The costly answer blames the market. The market fell 5% and the sector 8%; a 22% fall is mostly your stock, and the interviewer has usually done the arithmetic before asking.
The opposite mistake is apologising for the whole 22%. That shows you cannot separate what you could control from what you could not, which is exactly the skill attribution exists to test. Give the split, own the 13 points, and move to what you would do now.
What the interviewer asks next
- Selvora has since recovered 10% while the sector is flat. What does that say about your thesis?
- How would you have hedged the sector risk at the time of the pitch?
- Would you buy Selvora today? What would you need to see?
- How would an allocator run the same split on a fund's returns?
Asked at Point72, Investment Research, New York, 2026 (Wall Street Oasis): Asked about the case competition and what happened to the stock; nobody else I know was asked about it
Company names and figures are illustrative.
