Case 055Global macro tradesCore
Design a financial stress index for five economies, Aldora, Brevia, Corvin, Dessala and Estmar, from credit growth, the current account balance and short-term external debt to reserves. How do you normalise, weight and rank, and what are the index's weaknesses?
1The situation
You cover five emerging economies for a macro fund. For each you have three indicators, latest year:
Credit growth, % a year: Aldora 22, Brevia 8, Corvin 15, Dessala 30, Estmar 5. Current account balance, % of GDP: Aldora -2, Brevia +2, Corvin -3, Dessala -6, Estmar +3. Short-term external debt as % of foreign exchange reserves: Aldora 90, Brevia 40, Corvin 140, Dessala 60, Estmar 30.
The PM wants one number per country that ranks vulnerability to a sudden stop in foreign funding.
2Your task
Build the index: how you make the indicators comparable, how you weight them, which country ranks most stressed, and what could make the ranking wrong.
Quick check
Why can you not simply add the three indicators together?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Convert each indicator to a z-score, flip the current account so deficits count as stress, and average: with equal weights Dessala ranks most stressed at +0.89, just ahead of Corvin at +0.72. The ranking is a judgement, not a fact. Put half the weight on short-term debt, the most direct measure of a sudden-stop risk, and Corvin moves to the top at +0.97. The index must disclose its weights, and two of its inputs largely measure the same credit boom.
Step 1How do you make three unlike numbers comparable?
Measure each country against the group, in units of the group's spread. A class ranks pupils across maths, which is marked out of 100, and an essay marked out of 20, by asking how far above the class average each pupil sits in each subject, not by adding the raw marks. A z-scoreHow many standard deviations a value sits above or below the average of the group. Zero is average; +1 is one spread above it. does the same: subtract the five-country average and divide by the spread. Credit growth averages 16% with a spread of 9.1, so Dessala's 30% scores +1.53. For the current account, multiply by minus one first, because a deficit is the stress; Dessala's -6% then scores +1.45.
Step 2How do you choose the weights?
Start from what the index is for. The PM asked about a sudden stop in foreign funding, and short-term external debt against reserves is the most direct measure of that: it asks whether a country could pay what falls due in a year if foreign lenders refused to roll it over. Credit growth and the current account describe how the pressure builds; the debt ratio describes whether it breaks. Equal weights give Dessala +0.89, Corvin +0.72 and Aldora +0.45. Put half the weight on the debt ratio and a quarter on each of the others, and Corvin leads at +0.97, well clear of Dessala at +0.59: Dessala's stress is a credit boom financed so far with long-term money, Corvin's is debt that falls due within the year.
| Economy | Credit growth z | Current account z | ST debt z | Equal weights | Half on ST debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aldora | +0.66 | +0.24 | +0.45 | +0.45 | +0.45 |
| Brevia | -0.87 | -0.97 | -0.81 | -0.88 | -0.86 |
| Corvin | -0.11 | +0.54 | +1.71 | +0.72 | +0.97 |
| Dessala | +1.53 | +1.45 | -0.30 | +0.89 | +0.59 |
| Estmar | -1.20 | -1.27 | -1.06 | -1.18 | -1.15 |
Step 3What are the index's weaknesses?
Name them before the PM does. First, credit growth and the current account move together here, with a correlation of 0.94 across the five, so equal weights count the same credit boom twice and underweight the one indicator that measures funding risk directly. Second, z-scores against a group of five are unstable: add a sixth country with a 200% debt ratio and every score moves. Scoring each country against its own history is a sensible second view. Third, the inputs are annual and published with a lag, while a sudden stop happens in weeks, so pair the index with market prices such as currency moves and bond spreads.
Close with how you would use it. An index like this does not say when a crisis comes; it says where one would hurt most. A macro fund would use it to decide which currencies to be short against which to be long when global funding tightens, and would test it by asking whether it ranked past stressed countries highly before their trouble, not after.
Where candidates lose it
The most common loss is adding raw indicators, which lets the one with the widest numeric range, here the debt ratio, decide the answer alone, or forgetting to flip the current account so that a surplus counts as stress.
The second is presenting the ranking as a finding. Changing the weights moved the top country from Dessala to Corvin; an index that hides its weights hides its conclusion. Say the weights and say why.
What the interviewer asks next
- How would you test whether this index would have predicted past currency crises?
- Would you use ranks instead of z-scores? What do you gain and lose?
- How would you add a market-based indicator, and how often would you update the index?
Asked at Bridgewater Associates, Generalist, New York, 2026 (Wall Street Oasis): 1 on 1 analytical interview about some prompt, e.g designing a corruption index
Company names and figures are illustrative.
