Case 085Risk limits and drawdownsCore
Pallav Multi-Strategy Fund can buy a put spread costing 1.5% of NAV a year that pays 12% of NAV if the market falls 25%. You think such a crash happens once in eight years. Is the hedge worth buying?
1The situation
Pallav Multi-Strategy Fund earns about 10% in an ordinary year, but its books are long enough that a 25% market crash would cost it about 20% of NAV. Its investors' terms and its own risk policy treat a 15% peak-to-trough drawdown as the line at which capital is cut and redemptions start.
A dealer offers a one-year index put spread, rolled every year, costing 1.5% of NAV a year and paying 12% of NAV if the market falls 25% or more. Your view is that such a crash happens about once in eight years. All figures are illustrative.
2Your task
Is the hedge worth its cost in expectation, and if not, what is it for?
Quick check
On your once-in-eight-years view, what is the hedge's expected value?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
In expectation the hedge roughly breaks even, so buy it for the drawdown, not the return. Twelve points of premium over eight years buy one twelve-point payout. What changes is the crash year: the fund loses 9.5% instead of 20%, staying inside its 15% drawdown line. With the same average return and a smaller crash, the hedged fund also compounds to more, Rs 1.60 against Rs 1.56 per rupee over eight years.
Step 1What is the hedge worth in expectation?
Think of home insurance priced fairly: over a lifetime, the premiums roughly equal the expected claims. People still buy it, because the year the house burns is the year they could not survive without it. A 12% payout with a one-in-eight chance is worth 1.5% a year, the same as the premium, so on your own view the hedge is a wash. If crashes come once in twelve years instead, the expected payout is 1.0% a year, and the hedge costs about half a point a year net.
Step 2So what is the hedge actually for?
Staying in the game. A multi-strategy fund that loses 20% crosses its 15% line: capital is cut at the bottom, investors redeem, and the fund cannot be in the market for the recovery. Hedged, the crash year is minus 20% plus 12% less the 1.5% premium, minus 9.5%. The value of the hedge is the value of never being forced to sell at the worst moment, which does not appear in a one-year expected value.
Step 3Does a break-even hedge cost anything over time?
No, and here it even helps. Run eight years with one crash. Unhedged: seven years of +10% and one of -20%. Hedged: seven of +8.5% and one of -9.5%. Both average 6.25% a year, but the hedged path compounds to Rs 1.60 per rupee against Rs 1.56, because a smaller loss needs a smaller gain to recover. Cutting the size of the worst year raises the growth rate even when the average is unchanged: 6.07% a year against 5.71%.
| 1.085 | hedged ordinary year, 10% less the 1.5% premium |
| 0.095 | hedged crash-year loss: 20% less the 12% payout, plus the premium |
| 1.10 and 0.20 | unhedged ordinary year and crash year |
Step 4What could make the hedge fail?
Three gaps. A put spread pays only between its strikes, so a 40% crash pays no more than a 25% one, and a 15% fall pays little or nothing while still hurting the fund. The fund's losses may not track the index: a crash led by crowded hedge fund positions can hurt Pallav more than the market. And the one-in-eight view is itself a guess; a hedge bought on a wrong probability is either wasted premium or too small. Close with the view: buy it as drawdown insurance, size it to keep the crash year inside the limit, and check the fund's actual sensitivity to a market fall every quarter.
Where candidates lose it
The usual miss is judging the hedge only on expected value, finding it roughly zero, and rejecting it. For a leveraged fund with a drawdown limit, the shape of the worst year matters more than the average.
The second is the opposite: buying the hedge because 12% is eight times 1.5%, without weighing the payout by its probability. The multiple alone says nothing about value.
What the interviewer asks next
- What if the dealer charges 2.5% a year for the same spread?
- How would you size the hedge to keep the crash year at exactly minus 15%?
- Would you rather buy puts on the index or reduce the book's gross exposure?
- How would the answer change for a fund with no drawdown limit and locked-up capital?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
