Fin Maverick
Foundations VocabularyAccounting & ReportingEconomics & MacroQuant Methods & ProgrammingBusiness & Company AnalysisCorporate Finance & ValuationBehavioural Finance
Banking & Market InfrastructureFixed Income & RatesDerivatives & Structured ProductsPublic EquitiesTransactions & DealsPortfolio ConstructionFunds & AMCs
Private Markets & AlternativesRisk, Treasury & ControlAI & Digital FinanceStochastic Calculus & PricingWealth & Personal FinanceIndian Markets & RegulationProfessional Practice
CalculatorComparison
Frameworks
Explore Bootcamps
Equity ResearchPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund MasteryInvestment Banking Analyst
Private Equity AnalystQuant & Hedge Fund AnalystBreaking Into VCFinancial Analyst Program
Risk Management ProgramPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsDerivatives Foundation
Explore Free Courses

Equity Research6

Writing an Investment ThesisBuilding a Discounted Cash FlowReading an Annual Report FastReading a Sector Before a CompanySpotting Quality of Earnings Red FlagsBuilding a Revenue Forecast From Drivers

Portfolio Management3

Rebalancing: When, Why and What It CostsStrategic and Tactical Asset AllocationMeasuring Risk in a Portfolio

Mutual Fund Mastery3

Comparing Funds Without Being FooledHow a NAV Is Struck and Which Day You GetReading a Fund Factsheet Properly

Derivatives Unlocked4

Hedging a Real ExposureThe Greeks, PracticallyFutures, the Basis and What Moves ItReading an Option Payoff

AI For Finance2

Retrieval and Grounding for FinanceDocument Extraction in Finance

Breaking Into Quants4

Backtesting a StrategyHypothesis TestingCleaning Financial DataRegression for Finance

Breaking Into VC3

Sizing a MarketReading a Term Sheet as a FounderHow a Venture Round Actually Works

Financial Analyst Program4

Common Size and Trend AnalysisReading a Cash Flow StatementRatio Analysis That Says SomethingBuilding a Working Capital Schedule

Risk Management Program2

Credit Exposure and How It Is ReducedValue at Risk and What It Hides

Investment Banking Analyst3

Precedent Transactions and Why They DifferReading a Term Sheet StructurallyBuilding a Comparable Companies Table

Private Wealth Management3

Tax Aware Portfolio DecisionsBuilding a Client Risk ProfileGoal Based Planning Arithmetic

Debt Capital Markets3

Analysing an Issuer's CreditDuration and What It Does Not Tell YouBond Pricing and Yield Mechanics

Private Equity Analyst2

Fund Waterfalls and CarryThe LBO in Structure

Hedge Funds Analyst2

Short Selling MechanicsLong Short Mechanics
QuarksCourses
Explore Interview Preparation
Investment BankingEquity ResearchVenture CapitalistPrivate EquityHedge Funds
QuantFinancial AnalysisPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsRisk Management
Derivatives FoundationPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund Mastery
PartnershipsShowdown
Log inSign up
Interview tracksAll
1Investment Banking
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
2Equity Research
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
3Venture Capital
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
4Private Equity
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
5Hedge Funds
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
6Quant
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
7Financial Analysis
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
8Private Wealth Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
9Debt Capital Markets
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
10Risk Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
11Derivatives Foundation
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
12Portfolio Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
13Mutual Fund Mastery
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
020

Case 020M&A strategyCore

A cement company needs new capacity. Building a plant is cheaper but takes two years; buying a rival's plant earns from day one. Compare the two on value and timing and give the board a view.

1The situation

Tarkesh Cement needs 2 million tonnes of extra capacity to keep its share in a growing region. It can build a new plant for Rs 1,400 crore, spending Rs 700 crore now and Rs 700 crore at the end of year 1, with EBITDA of Rs 200 crore a year from year 3.

Or it can buy a rival's operating plant of the same size for Rs 1,800 crore, paid now, which earns Rs 200 crore of EBITDA from year 1. Tarkesh's WACC is 11%. Assume both plants then run for the same long life, and use EBITDA as a stand-in for cash flow.

2Your task

Which option is worth more, by how much, and what would change the answer? What do you tell the board?

Quick check

Buying costs Rs 400 crore more on the headline. In today's money, is the premium larger or smaller than that?

Worked solution

Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.

30-second answerThe answer to give first

On these numbers building is worth about Rs 127 crore more, but the margin is thin enough that a one-year delay would flip it. Buying costs about Rs 469 crore more in today's money and buys two extra years of EBITDA worth about Rs 343 crore. A build that slips a year loses Rs 146 crore of value, more than its lead. Tell the board: build, if the region can wait and the project is well controlled; otherwise the premium buys certainty worth paying.

Step 1What exactly does the premium for buying pay for?

Time and certainty. Both options end with the same plant earning the same Rs 200 crore a year; the only differences are what you pay, when you pay it, and when the earnings start. So compare just those differences, rather than valuing two whole plants. It is like choosing between building a house and buying a finished one next door: the finished house costs more, but you stop paying rent two years sooner.

Build or buy: the same plant, two cash flow profiles, Rs croreBuild: Rs 1,400 crore over two years, EBITDA from year 3-700-700200200200200200200200200Buy: Rs 1,800 crore now, EBITDA from year 1-1,800200200200200200200200200200200the two years you pay for012345678910YearExtra cost of buying, today: 469Value of years 1 and 2 EBITDA: 343Build ahead by about 127
Building spends Rs 1,400 crore over two years and earns from year 3; buying pays Rs 1,800 crore at once and earns from year 1, so it costs about Rs 469 crore more in today's money for two extra years of EBITDA worth about Rs 343 crore.
Step 2What do the numbers say?

Cost first. Building is Rs 700 crore now plus Rs 700 crore in a year, worth Rs 1330.6 crore today. Buying is Rs 1,800 crore now. The premium for buying is about Rs 469 crore, and what it buys is EBITDA in years 1 and 2, worth Rs 200 crore over 1.11 plus Rs 200 crore over 1.11 squared, about Rs 343 crore. Building comes out ahead by about Rs 127 crore.

Rs crore, today's moneyBuildBuyDifference
Cost1,330.61,800.0(469.4)
EBITDA in years 1 and 20.0342.5342.5
EBITDA from year 3 onsamesame0.0
Build ahead by126.9
In today's money, buying Tarkesh's capacity costs Rs 469.4 crore more and earns Rs 342.5 crore more in its first two years, so building is ahead by about Rs 127 crore before allowing for any build risk.
Step 3What would change the answer?

Run the risks that sit only on the build side. A one-year delay pushes Rs 200 crore of EBITDA from year 3 into the future and costs about Rs 146 crore, more than the Rs 127 crore lead; a cost overrun of about 10% wipes the lead out too. Greenfield cement plants face land, permits and equipment delivery, so neither is unlikely. Two points cut the other way: real cash flow is EBITDA less tax and maintenance capex, which shrinks the value of the two early years, and an acquired plant is older, so it may need more maintenance and have a shorter life. At 75% cash conversion, the build lead grows to about Rs 212 crore.

Then the strategic point the numbers cannot hold: if a rival will add capacity in the region within two years, buying the plant now both adds Tarkesh's capacity and removes a competitor's, and the price of the market share lost while building could exceed the whole difference. The board recommendation should say which of these the decision hangs on, not just which number is bigger.

Where candidates lose it

The common error is comparing Rs 1,400 crore with Rs 1,800 crore and declaring building Rs 400 crore cheaper. That ignores both the timing of the build spending and the two years of earnings the bought plant delivers.

The second miss is treating the build timetable as certain. A build case that looks better by Rs 100 crore but loses Rs 146 crore for each year of delay is a judgement about execution, and the board needs to hear that.

What the interviewer asks next

  • What price for the rival's plant would make Tarkesh indifferent?
  • How would you value the rival's lost capacity as part of the acquisition case?
  • The acquisition can be paid half now and half in two years. Does that change your view?
← Case 019Paper LBO with the details people skip: transaction fees funded by equity and minimum cash left on the balance sheet. Work out the equity cheque, the MOIC and the IRR, and what the two items cost.Case 021 →A middle-market plastics company wants the biggest term loan the bank's policy allows. Size it on leverage and on fixed charge cover, and set covenants with 25% headroom.

Company names and figures are illustrative.

Fin Maverick Free CoursesExplore Free Courses
Fin Maverick BootcampsExplore Bootcamps
Fin Maverick

Finance education that ends in a job, not a certificate that gathers dust. Built for young India.

LEARN
CalculatorsFrameworksComparisonsInterview RoadmapsShowdown
RESOURCES
All CoursesFree CoursesBootcampsInternships
COMPANY
AboutJob openingPartnership
LEGAL
Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsContent LicenseReturn & Refund Policy
© 2026 FIN MAVERICK / BUILT FOR INDIA.DO FINANCE, DO NOT JUST READ ABOUT IT.