Investment Banking interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

100

Firms

46

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsTSTruist Securities10Rothschild & Co8Centerview Partners7CSCredit Suisse7HWHarris Williams6Houlihan Lokey6Lazard6Mizuho6Barclays5Citi5Deutsche Bank5Evercore5Moelis & Company5MSMorgan Stanley5Piper Sandler5RCRBC Capital Markets5Goldman Sachs4Nomura4TD Securities4Bank of America3GSGuggenheim Securities3J.P. Morgan3Jefferies3Moody's3Perella Weinberg Partners3WPWarburg Pincus3WBWilliam Blair3HSBC2Lincoln International2Scotiabank2TPTPG2UBS2Wells Fargo Securities2Advent International1Apollo Global Management1Bain Capital1Balyasny Asset Management1BLBlackRock1BPBNP Paribas1General Atlantic1Invesco1Morningstar1PIMCO1STSociété Générale1SSState Street1WMWellington Management1

Topic

All topicsAccounting14Valuation21M&A10Markets and deals10Capital markets3LBO8Leveraged finance3Restructuring2Credit3Debt capital markets2Capital structure2Case and estimation11Brainteasers6Fit5

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseBrainteaserFitMarket view

1. 028Which company would have a higher multiple, an asset-heavy company or an asset-light one?ValuationIntermediatetechnicalBarclaysInvestment Banking · London · 2026

   Say this

   Asset-light, normally, on EV/EBITDA. It converts more of its EBITDA into free cash flow because it does not have to spend heavily just to maintain the asset base, and it can grow without proportional capital.

   Then walk it

   1. Asset-light means low maintenance CapEx, so a higher share of EBITDA reaches free cash flow. Buyers pay for cash, not for EBITDA.
   2. It also means higher return on invested capital and the ability to scale without a matching balance sheet, which supports a growth premium.
   3. The mechanical wrinkle worth flagging: asset-heavy companies have large D&A, which inflates EBITDA relative to EBIT. So their EV/EBITDA looks artificially low while their EV/EBIT looks more normal.
   4. That is why comparing the two on EV/EBITDA alone is misleading, and why I would pull EV/EBIT or EBITDA less CapEx as well.
   5. The exception: an asset-heavy business with a genuinely protected asset, like a toll road or a regulated utility with a rate base, can command a high multiple precisely because the assets are the moat.

   Where candidates lose it

   Answering 'asset-light' with no mechanism. And missing the D&A point, which is the technically interesting half: part of the multiple gap is real economics and part is just an accounting artefact of EBITDA.

   Expect next

   • So how would you compare them fairly?
   • How would you value an airline that leases its fleet versus one that owns it?
   • Where does a toll road fit in your answer?

   Reported by candidates at Barclays (Investment Banking, London, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

2. 043Walk me through a deal you have been following, and tell me how it changed the industry.Markets and dealsIntermediatetechnicalBarclaysInvestment Banking · New York · 2023EvercoreInvestment Banking · Menlo Park · 2025Moelis & CompanyInvestment Banking · London · 2026WBWilliam BlairInvestment Banking · Atlanta · 2026

   Say this

   Pick one deal, know it cold, and tell it as a story with a number in every sentence: who bought whom, for how much, at what multiple, funded how, and why it made strategic sense.

   Then walk it

   1. Open with the facts in one breath: acquirer, target, enterprise value, the multiple paid, the premium to the undisturbed price, and the funding mix.
   2. Then the strategic rationale in one sentence. What did the buyer get that it could not build, and what synergies did it guide to?
   3. Then your own view, which is the part that matters. Was the price defensible? I would say something like: at fourteen times EBITDA against a peer set at eleven, the buyer needed the full guided synergies to justify it, so the deal is really a bet on integration.
   4. Then the industry effect: did it trigger consolidation, did it force a competitor response, did it change how the sector is valued?
   5. Pick a deal in the group you are interviewing with, and pick one where you have an actual opinion. A deal you can only describe is worse than a smaller deal you can argue about.

   Where candidates lose it

   Choosing the biggest headline deal and only reciting what the press release said. If you cannot say what multiple was paid and whether you think it was too much, you have not followed the deal, you have read about it.

   Expect next

   • Was the price too high?
   • If you were the buyer, what would you have worried about in diligence?
   • Who else could have bought it?

   Reported by candidates at Barclays (Investment Banking, New York, 2023); Evercore (Investment Banking, Menlo Park, 2025); Moelis & Company (Investment Banking, London, 2026); William Blair (Investment Banking, Atlanta, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.