Investment Banking interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

100

Firms

46

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsTSTruist Securities10Rothschild & Co8Centerview Partners7CSCredit Suisse7HWHarris Williams6Houlihan Lokey6Lazard6Mizuho6Barclays5Citi5Deutsche Bank5Evercore5Moelis & Company5MSMorgan Stanley5Piper Sandler5RCRBC Capital Markets5Goldman Sachs4Nomura4TD Securities4Bank of America3GSGuggenheim Securities3J.P. Morgan3Jefferies3Moody's3Perella Weinberg Partners3WPWarburg Pincus3WBWilliam Blair3HSBC2Lincoln International2Scotiabank2TPTPG2UBS2Wells Fargo Securities2Advent International1Apollo Global Management1Bain Capital1Balyasny Asset Management1BLBlackRock1BPBNP Paribas1General Atlantic1Invesco1Morningstar1PIMCO1STSociété Générale1SSState Street1WMWellington Management1

Topic

All topicsAccounting14Valuation21M&A10Markets and deals10Capital markets3LBO8Leveraged finance3Restructuring2Credit3Debt capital markets2Capital structure2Case and estimation11Brainteasers6Fit5

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseBrainteaserFitMarket view

1. 075What are you seeing in your coverage sector right now, and where is the opportunity over the next 12 to 24 months?Markets and dealsHardsuperdayLazardMergers and Acquisitions · New York · 2026NomuraGeneralist · San Francisco · 2026

   Say this

   Answer like a banker pitching, not a student summarising. Name the structural change in the sector, then the deal type it generates, then the specific companies you would call.

   Then walk it

   1. Open with the structural driver. Something like: the sector has too many subscale players and a cost base that only works above a certain revenue level, so consolidation is inevitable.
   2. Then name the deal type that follows. Structural overcapacity means mergers of equals and take-privates. A regulatory change means carve-outs. A technology shift means acquisitions of capability.
   3. Then be specific about targets and buyers. Two or three names with a reason each. This is the part almost nobody does, and it is the part that gets you the offer.
   4. Then the constraint. What is stopping these deals from happening today, financing cost, a valuation gap, antitrust, a founder who will not sell? Naming the blocker shows you are thinking commercially.
   5. Close with the actual pitch: 'so over the next year I would expect the mid-cap names to be taken out, and the call I would make is to X.'

   Where candidates lose it

   Giving a sector summary with no deal thesis. Coverage bankers get paid to originate. If your answer does not end with a transaction and a name, you have answered a different question.

   Expect next

   • Who would buy them?
   • What is stopping that deal today?
   • Pitch me a company.

   Reported by candidates at Lazard (Mergers and Acquisitions, New York, 2026); Nomura (Generalist, San Francisco, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

2. 077Why is crypto lagging gold when both are meant to be hedges, and how is AI affecting equities and rates?Markets and dealsHardsuperdayNomuraGlobal Markets · New York · 2026

   Say this

   Because they are not the same hedge. Gold is a long-duration store of value with central bank demand behind it. Crypto has traded as a high-beta risk asset, correlated with tech, not as a haven.

   Then walk it

   1. The empirical point first: crypto's correlation has been with the Nasdaq, not with gold. It sells off when risk appetite falls, which is precisely when a hedge is supposed to work.
   2. Gold's bid is structurally different. Central bank buying, particularly reserve diversification away from dollar assets, is price-insensitive demand that crypto does not have.
   3. So the narrative of digital gold has not been validated by the correlation data, and that gap is the answer.
   4. On AI and equities: it has concentrated index returns in a handful of names, so index-level valuation is misleading. It has also turned a capital-light sector into a capital-heavy one, because hyperscaler capital expenditure is now enormous.
   5. On AI and rates: that capital expenditure is increasingly debt-funded, which means real issuance and upward pressure on yields at the long end. And the longer-run question is whether AI raises productivity enough to lift potential growth, which would raise the neutral rate.
   6. If I had to give one view: the AI trade has shifted from a margin story to a capital intensity story, and that is why it now shows up in credit markets as well as equity.

   Where candidates lose it

   Accepting the premise that both are hedges. The question contains a false assumption and the right move is to challenge it with the correlation evidence. Then pick one clear view on AI rather than describing both sides.

   Expect next

   • So would you own either?
   • What would change your view on crypto's correlation?
   • How is AI capital expenditure being funded?

   Reported by candidates at Nomura (Global Markets, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.