Investment Banking interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

100

Firms

46

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsTSTruist Securities10Rothschild & Co8Centerview Partners7CSCredit Suisse7HWHarris Williams6Houlihan Lokey6Lazard6Mizuho6Barclays5Citi5Deutsche Bank5Evercore5Moelis & Company5MSMorgan Stanley5Piper Sandler5RCRBC Capital Markets5Goldman Sachs4Nomura4TD Securities4Bank of America3GSGuggenheim Securities3J.P. Morgan3Jefferies3Moody's3Perella Weinberg Partners3WPWarburg Pincus3WBWilliam Blair3HSBC2Lincoln International2Scotiabank2TPTPG2UBS2Wells Fargo Securities2Advent International1Apollo Global Management1Bain Capital1Balyasny Asset Management1BLBlackRock1BPBNP Paribas1General Atlantic1Invesco1Morningstar1PIMCO1STSociété Générale1SSState Street1WMWellington Management1

Topic

All topicsAccounting14Valuation21M&A10Markets and deals10Capital markets3LBO8Leveraged finance3Restructuring2Credit3Debt capital markets2Capital structure2Case and estimation11Brainteasers6Fit5

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseBrainteaserFitMarket view

1. 058What type of company is a good candidate for a dividend recapitalisation?LBOHardtechnicalRothschild & CoInvestment Banking · London · 2026

   Say this

   One that has already deleveraged meaningfully, has very stable cash flow, and has no near-term need for its balance sheet. Typically a sponsor-owned asset two or three years into the hold where the exit has been delayed.

   Then walk it

   1. The mechanical precondition is headroom. The company must have paid down enough debt that re-levering back to its original multiple is still something the credit market will fund.
   2. Cash flow has to be genuinely stable, because you are removing the cushion. Contracted revenue, low cyclicality, low CapEx.
   3. No competing call on capital. If the company needs to fund a plant or an acquisition, the cash should go there instead.
   4. The motivation is almost always sponsor-side: fund life is advancing, the exit window is shut, and the sponsor wants to de-risk and crystallise part of the return. It resets the IRR clock because cash returned early is heavily weighted.
   5. And the honest downside: nothing about the operating business improved. Leverage went back up, the equity cushion is thinner, and if the cycle turns the company is more fragile. Lenders price that, and the covenant package usually tightens.

   Where candidates lose it

   Describing the mechanics but not the motive. This question is really asking whether you understand sponsor incentives and fund life. And you should name the downside, because a banker who pitches a recap without acknowledging the fragility is not credible.

   Expect next

   • How does it affect the sponsor's IRR?
   • Why would lenders agree to it?
   • What happens if the cycle turns afterwards?

   Reported by candidates at Rothschild & Co (Investment Banking, London, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

2. 062What makes a company distressed, and why restructuring?RestructuringIntermediatetechnicalEvercoreRestructuring · New York · 2025Rothschild & CoRestructuring · London · 2025

   Say this

   Distress is when a company cannot service its obligations from its cash flow, or cannot refinance a maturity. Distinguish operational distress, where the business is broken, from financial distress, where a good business carries the wrong capital structure.

   Then walk it

   1. The observable triggers: interest coverage falling toward one, a covenant breach, a maturity wall it cannot refinance, bonds trading at a deep discount to par, and a credit downgrade.
   2. Financial distress means the operations work but the balance sheet does not. The fix is a balance sheet fix: amend and extend, a debt-for-equity swap, a rights issue, a liability management exercise.
   3. Operational distress means the business itself is impaired, by a lost contract, structural decline or a broken cost base. No amount of refinancing solves that; you need an operational turnaround or a sale.
   4. The distinction drives everything about the advice, so I would establish it first in any situation.
   5. On why restructuring specifically: the work is analytically harder than M&A because you are valuing the enterprise and then allocating it across a capital structure, and the negotiation is multi-party and adversarial. It is also counter-cyclical, which is a genuine reason to want to be in it.

   Where candidates lose it

   Not separating operational from financial distress. That single distinction is the core intellectual content of restructuring, and a restructuring interviewer will hear immediately whether you have it. Also, do not answer 'why restructuring' with 'because it is counter-cyclical' alone; that reads as cynical.

   Expect next

   • What is the recovery on each claim?
   • Do you understand what we actually do here?
   • What were the recent developments in the debt space?

   Reported by candidates at Evercore (Restructuring, New York, 2025); Rothschild & Co (Restructuring, London, 2025). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.