Case 002Fund selection and due diligenceCore
A wealth platform must put one flexi cap fund on its recommended list. Fund A has the best five-year return but a new manager, Fund B has a long record and lower risk, and Fund C is cheap but moves almost exactly with the index. Which goes on the list?
1The situation
Chandrika Wealth Platform, an invented online distributor, shows one flexi cap fund on its recommended list. The research team has narrowed it to three. The category benchmark returned 14.3% a year over five years with 17% volatility.
Fund A: five-year return 17.1% a year, volatility 19%, current manager in charge for 1 year, AUM Rs 42,000 crore, expense ratio 1.7%, R-squared to the index 0.82. Fund B: 15.2%, 15%, manager tenure 9 years, AUM Rs 8,000 crore, 1.6%, R-squared 0.85. Fund C: 14.0%, 16%, manager tenure 6 years, AUM Rs 3,500 crore, 0.9%, R-squared 0.96.
2Your task
Which fund goes on the list, and what would you say to the head of distribution who wants Fund A because it tops the return table?
Quick check
What is the single biggest problem with Fund A's 17.1%?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Fund B goes on the list. It beat the benchmark by 0.9% a year with less volatility than the index, under the same manager for all five years. Fund A's higher return belongs mostly to a manager who has left. Fund C moves 96% with the index yet charges an active fee and lagged the benchmark, so an index fund would do its job more cheaply.
Step 1What is a return table actually telling you?
Imagine choosing a surgeon by a hospital's success rate, then learning the surgeon who built that record retired last year. The number is real; it just no longer describes who will operate on you. A fund's past return is evidence about the people and process that produced it, so the first question is whether those people and that process are still in place. Fund A's current manager has run it for one of the five years in its record. The other four are a different person's work.
Step 2Once risk is counted, how do the returns compare?
Put each return over the volatility it took to earn it. Using an assumed 6.5% risk-free rate, the Sharpe ratioReturn above a risk-free rate, divided by volatility. It measures how much extra return each unit of risk earned. is 0.56 for A, 0.58 for B and 0.47 for C. Once risk is counted, Fund B is at least as good as Fund A, and its record is entirely its current manager's. Fund B also beat the benchmark while being less volatile than it, 15% against 17%, which is the combination a platform wants to put in front of clients who will panic in a fall.
| Fund | Return | Above index | Volatility | Sharpe | Years run by manager |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund A | 17.1% | +2.8% | 19% | 0.56 | 1 of 5 |
| Fund B | 15.2% | +0.9% | 15% | 0.58 | 5 of 5 |
| Fund C | 14.0% | -0.3% | 16% | 0.47 | 5 of 5 |
Step 3Why not the cheap fund?
Fund C's R-squared of 0.96 means 96% of its month-to-month movement is explained by the index. Paying 0.9% for a fund that is 96% index is paying an active fee for a small active bet, and that bet lost 0.3% a year against the benchmark. Its active risk, about 3.2% a year, is the only part of the fund the fee is buying. An index fund costing a fraction of that would deliver nearly the same portfolio. Fund C is not a bad product; it is the wrong product for a slot meant for active management.
Step 4What do you tell the head of distribution?
Give the reason in one line, then the path back. Fund A stays on the watch list, not the recommended list, until its current manager has built a record of their own, usually three years. Its size is a second question worth raising: Rs 42,000 crore in a flexi cap fund limits how much it can hold in smaller companies, which is often where a flexi cap fund's edge comes from. The limit of this analysis is honest too: five years is a short sample for any fund, and Fund B's lead on risk-adjusted return is small. Its advantage is that its evidence is clean.
Where candidates lose it
The fastest way to lose this case is ranking by the return column and stopping. The interviewer has planted the one-year manager tenure precisely to see whether you ask who earned the number.
The second miss is choosing Fund C because it is cheapest. Cost matters, but a fund that is 96% index is judged against an index fund, and on that comparison it is expensive.
What the interviewer asks next
- Fund A's new manager came from a fund with a 12-year record of beating its benchmark. Does that change your answer?
- How would you check whether Fund B's lower volatility came from holding cash?
- Fund A's AUM doubles next year. What would you expect to happen to its style?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
