Case 025Real estate and infrastructureCore
Value a toll road concession with 18 years left: Rs 150 crore of toll revenue, traffic growing 5%, tariffs indexed at 3%, opex at 20% of revenue, discounted at 12%. What is it worth, what happens at 2% traffic growth, and why does the value fall over time?
1The situation
Setubandh Toll Road is a four-lane highway bypass with 18 years left on its concession, after which it reverts to the state for nothing. Toll revenue this year is Rs 150 crore. Traffic has grown about 5% a year and the concession lets tariffs rise 3% a year. Operating costs, including maintenance provisions, are 20% of revenue. The fund discounts projects like this at 12%; take that and the growth rates as the case's assumptions, and work before tax.
The interviewer wants a value, a sensitivity to traffic, and an explanation of how the value behaves as the years run off.
2Your task
Value the concession, show the effect of 2% rather than 5% traffic growth, and explain why a concession is a wasting asset.
Quick check
Traffic grows 5% and tariffs 3%. Does revenue grow 8% a year?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
At 5% traffic growth the concession is worth about Rs 1,575 crore, 13.1x this year's Rs 120 crore of operating cash flow; at 2% it is worth about Rs 1,242 crore, 21% less. Revenue grows 8.15% a year, so cash flow rises from Rs 130 crore to Rs 492 crore in year 18, and then stops. Because there is no terminal value, the road's value peaks a few years from now and then falls each year as the remaining cash flows run off, reaching zero at expiry.
Step 1How do you set up the cash flows?
A concession is a lease on a stream of tolls: the fund does not own the road, it owns 18 years of its cash. Revenue grows at (1.05 times 1.03) less 1, 8.15% a year; cash flow is 80% of revenue. Year 1 cash flow is Rs 129.8 crore, year 18 is Rs 491.7 crore, and there is no year 19. Discount each year at 12% and add them up. Compare it with a shop on a long lease: the rent you collect grows, but the day the lease ends the building goes back to the landlord, so you would never value it as a perpetuity.
| 150 x 0.80 | this year's operating cash flow, Rs 120 crore |
| 1.0815 | revenue growth from 5% traffic and 3% tariff compounded |
| 18 | years left on the concession, after which cash flow is zero |
Step 2What does 2% traffic growth do?
Revenue growth falls to (1.02 times 1.03) less 1, 5.06%. Value falls to about Rs 1,242 crore, a 21% drop for three points of traffic growth, because every one of the 18 years is lower and the later years, which carry most of the growth, are hit hardest. That sensitivity is the case: a toll road's value is a bet on traffic, and traffic depends on the economy of the region, on fuel prices, and on whether a competing road or rail line opens. The tariff index is written into the contract; the traffic is not.
| Traffic growth | Revenue growth | Year 18 cash flow | Value at 12% | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 3.00% | 204 | 1,069 | -32% |
| 2% | 5.06% | 292 | 1,242 | -21% |
| 5% | 8.15% | 492 | 1,575 | +0% |
| 7% | 10.21% | 690 | 1,860 | +18% |
Step 3Why does the value fall over time?
Because the asset is used up. Each year that passes removes one year of cash flow from the sum and adds nothing at the far end. Early on, the growth in the remaining cash flows outweighs the lost year, so the value drifts up for a few years; after that, every year removes more than growth adds, and the value slides to zero at expiry. An investor who buys at Rs 1,575 crore and sells after seven years at about Rs 1,863 crore has made little on the resale; the Rs 1,163 crore of cash collected on the way is the return, and each later buyer is paying for fewer years.
Two limits to state. The 12% is given; an infrastructure fund would build it from the cost of the project debt and an equity return, and at 10% the value is Rs 1,846 crore against Rs 1,359 crore at 14%. And the model is pre-tax with maintenance folded into opex; a real concession has a major resurfacing every few years and a handover condition at the end, both of which take cash out of the late years that this model counts in full.
Where candidates lose it
The common loss is adding a terminal value. A concession reverts to the state at expiry; the stream of cash simply ends, and a perpetuity would roughly double the value. If the interviewer asks what the road is worth in year 19, the answer is nothing.
The second miss is adding 5% and 3% to get 8% revenue growth. Traffic and tariff multiply; the difference is small each year and material over eighteen.
What the interviewer asks next
- A parallel expressway opens in year 6 and traffic falls 20% that year, then resumes 5% growth. What is the value now?
- The concession allows an extension of 5 years if traffic exceeds a threshold. How would you value that option?
- How much debt could this concession carry at 9%, and what does the amortisation profile have to look like?
Asked at Bain Capital, Private Equity, San Francisco, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): Asked unique case questions regarding infrastructure assets but also software/healthcare
Company names and figures are illustrative.
