Case 067Deal structuring and pricingWarm up
A buyer agreed a locked box price of Rs 500 crore. Before completion the seller took a Rs 12 crore dividend and Rs 3 crore of management fees. What is the buyer owed, and how would completion accounts have changed the price?
1The situation
A mid-market fund is buying Taruvar Timber, a processor of plantation timber for furniture makers, from its founding family. The share purchase agreement uses a locked boxA pricing mechanism in which the equity price is fixed off a balance sheet at a past date, and the seller promises that no value leaves the business to it between that date and completion.: the equity price of Rs 500 crore is fixed off the balance sheet at 31 March, when net debt was Rs 100 crore. Completion happens on 31 July after regulatory approvals.
Between the two dates the business generates Rs 20 crore of cash. On 15 May the family takes a Rs 12 crore dividend, and on 30 June the company pays Rs 3 crore of management fees to the family's holding company. Directors' ordinary salaries of Rs 1.5 crore over the period were listed as permitted leakage in the agreement. There is no interest ticker on the price, and working capital is assumed to sit at normal levels throughout.
2Your task
What is the buyer owed at completion, what does the seller receive, and what would the price have been under completion accounts instead?
Quick check
What is the buyer owed for the period between 31 March and completion?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
The buyer is owed Rs 15 crore, so the family nets Rs 485 crore; under completion accounts the price would have been about Rs 505 crore. In a locked box, economic ownership passes at 31 March, so the Rs 20 crore the business earns afterwards is the buyer's, and anything the seller takes out comes back rupee for rupee. Completion accounts price off net debt at 31 July instead, so the seller is paid for the cash earned and the leakage is netted automatically.
Step 1Who owns the business between the box date and completion?
The buyer, economically, from the box date. Think of buying a flat with a sale deed dated 1 April and possession on 1 August: if the owner rents it out in between and pockets the rent, you expect that rent back, because the flat was already yours. A locked box fixes the price at the box date and moves the business's profits and risks to the buyer from that day; the seller's only promise is that nothing of value leaves the company to it. That promise is the leakageAny transfer of value from the target to the seller or its connected parties after the locked box date: dividends, fees, bonuses, waived debts, assets sold cheap. covenant, and it is backed by a rupee-for-rupee indemnity.
Step 2Which payments count as leakage, and how much comes back?
Go down the list and ask of each item: did value go to the seller, and did the agreement allow it? The dividend and the fee went to the family and were not permitted, so the buyer is owed Rs 12 plus Rs 3, Rs 15 crore, and the family nets Rs 485 crore. The salaries went to the family too, but they were negotiated in advance as permitted leakage, which is the right way to handle a cost the business would have paid anyway. In practice the claim is settled by reducing the completion payment, or by an indemnity if it is found later; the effect is the same.
Step 3How would completion accounts have priced the same deal?
Completion accounts fix the enterprise value and work out the equity price from the balance sheet on the day the deal closes. Enterprise value is Rs 500 plus Rs 100, Rs 600 crore; net debt at 31 July is Rs 100 less the Rs 20 crore earned plus the Rs 15 crore paid out, Rs 95 crore; so the equity price is about Rs 505 crore. The leakage needs no separate claim, because cash that left the company raised net debt and cut the price automatically.
| Rs crore | Locked box | Completion accounts |
|---|---|---|
| Price basis | Fixed at 31 March | Set from 31 July balance sheet |
| Equity price before adjustments | 500 | 600 - 95 |
| Leakage | (15) by claim | already in net debt |
| Cash earned after 31 March | stays with the buyer | paid to the seller, +20 |
| Seller receives | 485 | 505 |
Step 4So which mechanism should a buyer prefer?
Each moves a different risk. In a locked box the buyer takes the trading risk from the box date and the seller gives up the cash earned after it, which is why sellers usually ask for a tickerA daily amount, often an interest rate on the equity price, added to a locked box price to pay the seller for the profits it gives up between the box date and completion. on the price. Without a ticker, a four-month gap between box date and completion costs the family Rs 20 crore here, and they should have negotiated for it. Completion accounts protect a buyer against a business that deteriorates before closing, at the cost of a post-completion dispute over the accounts. The limitation: this case assumed working capital stayed normal; in real completion accounts the working capital true-up is where most of the argument happens.
Where candidates lose it
The usual loss is adding the cash the business earned to what the buyer is owed, Rs 35 crore. That cash never left the company; the buyer already owns it by owning the shares, so only value that went out to the seller comes back.
The second is treating every payment to the family as leakage. Permitted leakage, like agreed salaries, is negotiated in advance precisely so that ordinary business costs do not become claims.
What the interviewer asks next
- The agreement had a ticker of 10% a year on the equity price. What does the family receive now?
- After completion the buyer finds the company sold a truck to a family member at half its book value. Is that leakage?
- Why do sellers in auctions usually prefer a locked box?
- How would you check the box-date balance sheet before signing, given you cannot adjust it later?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
