Private Equity interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

83

Firms

40

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsAdvent International6Apollo Global Management6Audax Group6Carlyle Group6EQT6Silver Lake6Vista Equity Partners6WPWarburg Pincus6HIH.I.G. Capital5Oaktree Capital Management5Platinum Equity5TPTPG5General Atlantic4AMAres Management3Blackstone3Clayton Dubilier and Rice3GSGuggenheim Securities3Insight Partners3Invesco3Lazard3Neuberger Berman3NUNuveen3TSTruist Securities3Bain Capital2HWHarris Williams2Kohlberg Kravis Roberts2Millennium Management2Moody's2Rothschild & Co2WBWilliam Blair2Bessemer Venture Partners1Citi1Evercore1FTFranklin Templeton1Houlihan Lokey1HPS Investment Partners1KKR1Mizuho1MSMorgan Stanley1Sycamore Partners1

Topic

All topicsLBO mechanics7Value creation5Returns2Fund economics9Investment judgement18Valuation6Firm knowledge2Credit and financing9Operations4Due diligence8Career and fit11Sector knowledge4Accounting2Deal structuring7Industry knowledge3Brainteasers3

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseFitMarket viewBrainteaser

1. 032How would you assess a fund's performance, and what metrics would you use?Fund economicsHardtechnicalNeuberger BermanPrivate Equity · London · 2022

   Say this

   IRR, multiple on invested capital, and distributions to paid-in capital, benchmarked against a public market equivalent. The key is distinguishing realised from unrealised, because unrealised value is the manager's own estimate.

   Then walk it

   1. IRR is time-weighted and can be flattered by early distributions or by subscription line facilities that delay calling capital. Treat it sceptically on its own.
   2. MOIC, multiple on invested capital, measures total value over capital invested and ignores timing. Reporting both together makes gaming obvious.
   3. DPI, distributions to paid-in, is the honest one: actual cash returned relative to cash called. A fund with high IRR and low DPI has not actually given anybody money yet.
   4. RVPI, residual value to paid-in, is the unrealised portion, marked by the manager. In a slow exit environment this can be most of the reported value, and it is an estimate, not a fact.
   5. Public market equivalent: compare against what the same cash flows would have earned in a public index. This is the test of whether illiquidity was rewarded, and it is the benchmark sophisticated allocators use.
   6. Then the qualitative work: return attribution across leverage, multiple and operations; loss ratio and how many deals were written off; consistency across vintages; and whether the team that produced the record is still there.

   Where candidates lose it

   Quoting IRR alone. The examinable content is the DPI versus RVPI split and the public market equivalent comparison. Also naming subscription lines as a way IRR gets flattered is a strong signal of real knowledge.

   Expect next

   • How do subscription lines flatter IRR?
   • What is a public market equivalent?
   • How would you compare two funds of different vintages?

   Reported by candidates at Neuberger Berman (Private Equity, London, 2022). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

2. 065What would you include in a portfolio right now if you could choose across all asset classes, including fund of funds?Fund economicsHardsuperdayNeuberger BermanPrivate Equity · London · 2022

   Say this

   Start from the objective and the liquidity constraint, not from asset classes. Then take a view on where risk is being compensated today, and build around that with a clear reason for every allocation.

   Then walk it

   1. Frame first: what return is needed, over what horizon, with what drawdown tolerance and what liquidity requirement. A twenty-year endowment and a five-year corporate pot get completely different answers.
   2. Then the relative value view. With cash and high-grade credit offering a real yield, the bar for taking equity and illiquidity risk is higher than it was for the previous decade, and the allocation should say so explicitly.
   3. Within private markets: favour strategies where the return does not depend on cheap leverage or multiple expansion. Private credit and operationally-driven mid-market buyout have a better case than large-cap financial engineering.
   4. Secondaries deserve a specific mention: they buy mature assets at a discount, shorten the J-curve, and give vintage diversification. In a slow exit environment, supply of secondary stakes is elevated, which is a genuine opportunity.
   5. Fund of funds: justify it or do not use it. It adds a fee layer, so it only makes sense for an investor without the team to select and access managers directly, or for accessing capacity-constrained funds.
   6. Then say what you are deliberately underweighting and why, and name the risk to the whole construction. An allocation with no underweights and no identified risk is not a view.

   Where candidates lose it

   Producing a balanced textbook allocation with no view and no reasoning about current pricing. And including fund of funds without addressing the double fee layer, which is the obvious challenge the interviewer will make.

   Expect next

   • Why fund of funds rather than direct?
   • What are you underweighting?
   • How would you assess a fund's performance before committing?

   Reported by candidates at Neuberger Berman (Private Equity, London, 2022). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.