Case 006Concentrated positions and liquidity eventsWarm up
A widow inherits Rs 3 crore held entirely in one bank's shares. How do you take her through the first steps to diversify, and how does the inherited cost base work?
1The situation
Sharada Iyer, 58, lost her husband three months ago. He left her his demat account, which holds one thing: shares of the invented Ashvattha Bank, now worth Rs 3 crore. He bought them over 2019 and 2020 for a total of Rs 90 lakh. Sharada has a family pension that covers most of her monthly spending, her own flat, and about Rs 20 lakh in deposits.
She tells you her husband believed in the bank and she feels selling would be disloyal. She also worries that selling will bring a large tax bill. Treat the tax rate used here, 12.5% on long-term gains from listed shares, as an illustration to be confirmed against current rules.
2Your task
What are the first steps, how much would you keep, what does the tax look like, and how do you handle her feeling about the shares?
Quick check
For capital gains tax when Sharada sells, what is her cost for the inherited shares?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Get the shares transmitted, review her needs, then sell in three stages and keep about 10%. Selling Rs 2.7 crore over nine months leaves Rs 30 lakh in Ashvattha. Her cost is her husband's, so the gain is about Rs 189 lakh and the illustrative tax about Rs 23.6 lakh, not the Rs 33.8 lakh a zero-cost reading implies. Keeping a slice honours the loyalty without betting her retirement on one bank.
Step 1Why is an inherited single stock a decision rather than a keepsake?
Imagine inheriting a shop and a warehouse full of one product. You would not refuse to sell any of it just because your husband chose it; you would ask whether one product is enough to live on. Holding Rs 3 crore in one bank is an active bet that one company will not stumble, and she is now the one making it, whether she decides to or not. A 40% fall in one bank's shares, which single banks have suffered in bad years, would cost her Rs 120 lakh, most of her investable wealth. Kept at 10%, the same fall costs Rs 12 lakh.
Step 2What are the first steps, in order?
First, transmissionThe process of moving securities from a deceased holder into the name of the nominee or legal heir, usually through the depository participant with a death certificate and a claim form.: the shares must move into her own demat account before anything can be sold, which typically needs a death certificate and a claim form, and more documents if there is no nomination. Second, review: her spending gap, an emergency reserve, how much risk the rest can take, and her husband's purchase records, which set the tax. Only then sell, and sell in stages, so no single day's price decides the outcome and she has time to get used to each step.
Step 3How does the inherited cost base change the tax?
In India an inheritance is not taxed when received, but a later sale is. For capital gains, the heir steps into the previous owner's shoes: his cost becomes her cost, and his holding period is added to hers. Selling Rs 270 lakh of the Rs 300 lakh holding carries 90% of his Rs 90 lakh cost, Rs 81 lakh, so the gain is Rs 189 lakh. At the illustrative 12.5% long-term rate, the tax is about Rs 23.62 lakh, roughly 8.8% of what she sells. Confirm the current rate, any annual exemption and the treatment of shares bought before 2018 with her tax adviser before the first sale.
| Reading of her cost, Rs lakh | Cost used | Taxable gain | Illustrative tax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero cost, because she paid nothing | 0 | 270.0 | 33.75 |
| Value at death, the US-style step-up | 270.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Her husband's cost, carried over | 81.0 | 189.0 | 23.62 |
Step 4How do you handle her loyalty to the shares?
Name it rather than argue with it. Her husband chose the bank for a portfolio that included his salary and his plans; she has a pension and a flat, and this is now her retirement money. Keeping 10%, Rs 30 lakh, lets her stay an Ashvattha shareholder in his memory while making sure one bank's bad year cannot undo her plans. Staging the sales over nine months also gives her room to change pace, and nothing about the plan requires a decision in her first weeks of grief beyond the paperwork.
Say the limit honestly. Selling in stages does not guarantee a better average price than selling at once; it trades a possibly better price for a smaller chance of regret. For a grieving client that trade is usually worth making, and the tax does not change with the pace because the gain is long-term throughout.
Where candidates lose it
The costly slip is the tax reading. Candidates either assume inherited shares have zero cost and scare the client with a bill a third too large, or borrow the US step-up and tell her there is no tax at all. Both change whether she sells.
The softer miss is moving straight to a model portfolio. Interviewers want the order: transmission, review, staged sale, and a sentence that deals with why she is reluctant.
What the interviewer asks next
- Her husband had named their son as nominee, not Sharada. What changes?
- Ashvattha falls 15% between the first and second tranche. Do you pause the plan?
- Would you give the Rs 30 lakh she keeps any rule of its own, such as a price at which it is reviewed?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
