Case 031Tax-aware portfolio movesCore
A client has booked Rs 18 lakh of gains this year and holds three positions sitting on losses of Rs 4, 7 and 11 lakh. Which losses do you harvest, what tax does it save, and what replaces the positions you sell?
1The situation
Gitanjali Sethna has a Rs 3 crore portfolio. Earlier this year she sold a fund she had held for years and booked Rs 18 lakh of long-term gains. Three holdings now show unrealised losses: position A, a sector fund bought eight months ago, down Rs 4 lakh; position B, a large-cap index fund held for two years, down Rs 7 lakh; and position C, a single stock held for three years, down Rs 11 lakh after the company lost its main contract.
Use an illustrative 12.5% tax rate on long-term gains and ignore any annual exemption. Tax rates, exemptions and set-off rules change, so confirm the current ones before acting.
2Your task
Which losses do you harvest and why? How much tax is saved at the illustrative rate, and what do you buy in place of what you sell?
Quick check
What is the tax saving from harvesting exactly enough loss to cover the Rs 18 lakh gain?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Harvest C and B, Rs 11 lakh and Rs 7 lakh, which cancel the Rs 18 lakh gain exactly and save Rs 2.25 lakh at the illustrative 12.5%. C's story has broken, so its money moves to the target mix. B is sold and replaced the same day with a similar index fund from another fund house, so the market exposure never leaves. A is not needed this year.
Step 1What does harvesting a loss actually do?
A shop owner who made money on one line and lost on another pays tax on the net, not on the winner alone. Selling a position that is below cost turns a paper loss into a realised lossA loss that exists for tax because the position has been sold, rather than one that only shows on a statement., which can be set against realised gains, so the tax is paid on the net. Gitanjali's Rs 18 lakh gain would cost Rs 2.25 lakh at 12.5%. Harvest Rs 18 lakh of losses and the net is zero.
Step 2Which losses do you pick?
Start with the position you would sell anyway. C lost its main contract, so the reason for owning it has gone; a loss on a position you no longer want is the cleanest harvest, because the tax saving and the investment decision point the same way. C gives Rs 11 lakh. B, the index fund, gives the remaining Rs 7 lakh, and it is easy to replace. That covers Rs 18 lakh exactly. A is not needed; harvesting it too would only create a Rs 4 lakh carry-forward, and a sector fund bought eight months ago may still carry an exit load.
| Position | Loss, Rs lakh | Action | What replaces it |
|---|---|---|---|
| C: single stock, thesis broken | 11.0 | Harvest | Target mix, not the same stock |
| B: large-cap index fund | 7.0 | Harvest | A similar index fund from another fund house |
| A: sector fund, 8 months old | 4.0 | Keep | No trade |
| Harvested | 18.0 |
Step 3Why replace B at all, and with what?
B was sold for tax, not because its role in the portfolio ended. Staying in cash while waiting would turn a tax decision into a market-timing bet. Buy a fund that tracks the same or a very similar index from a different fund house on the same day, so the exposure is unbroken. Some countries disallow a loss if the same security is bought back within a set period; confirm the current Indian treatment with a tax adviser before rebuying the identical fund.
Step 4Is the saving permanent?
Mostly it is a deferral, and saying so is what separates a good answer. The replacement for B is bought at today's lower price, so when it is eventually sold the gain is Rs 7 lakh larger. Harvesting is an interest-free loan from the tax authority: the Rs 2.25 lakh stays invested now and part of it is repaid later. Deferred for ten years at an illustrative 10% return, it is worth about Rs 1.38 lakh today, less trading costs and any exit loads.
Where candidates lose it
The first loss is harvesting everything in the red, Rs 22 lakh, because more loss sounds like more saving. The extra Rs 4 lakh saves nothing this year and may cost an exit load.
The second is selling B and leaving the money in cash to be safe. If the market rises before the money goes back in, the missed return can cost more than the tax saved.
What the interviewer asks next
- Gitanjali's gains were short-term instead. How does the set-off change?
- What if she has no gains this year: is harvesting still worth it?
- How would you document the replacement so the client does not see it as churning?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
