Private Wealth Management interview preparation
Client discovery, goals-based planning, asset allocation, tax and estate structuring, products and the commercial reality of building a book, with substantial Indian content on PMS, AIFs, SEBI's adviser rules and family structures. Every question is either traced to a named firm from a public candidate report, or tagged at desk level when we could not trace it.
100 questions, mapped to the firms that asked them
- Questions
- 100
- Traced to a firm
- 22
- Firms
- 13
- Updated
- September 2026
008What is a client's human capital, and how should it change the portfolio?Family officesWealth management
Say this
Human capital is the present value of the client's future earnings, and it is usually the largest asset a younger client owns. You treat it like a position on the balance sheet and build the financial portfolio to complement it, not to duplicate it.
Then walk it
- Size it roughly. A 32-year-old earning 60 lakh a year with thirty working years ahead has human capital worth several crore in present value terms, far more than his 80 lakh portfolio.
- Then classify it. A tenured professor's earnings are bond-like: stable, real, low correlation to markets. An equity trader's or a start-up founder's earnings are equity-like and highly correlated to the market.
- That drives the allocation. The bond-like earner can hold a very high equity weight in the financial portfolio because his total balance sheet is already heavily fixed-income. The equity-like earner should hold more fixed income than his age suggests, because a bear market hits his bonus, his ESOPs and his portfolio at the same time.
- It also prices insurance. Human capital is the thing term cover protects, so the sum assured should be anchored to it, not to a round number or a multiple of salary pulled out of the air.
- And it explains the classic glide path without hand-waving: equity weight falls with age because human capital, the bond-like part of the balance sheet, is being spent down and has to be replaced with actual bonds.
- The limitation: it is a model, and the discount rate and career assumptions do the work. I would use it directionally, to argue that a banker and a bureaucrat with the same salary need different portfolios, not to compute an exact weight.
Where candidates lose it
Knowing the phrase but not using it. The payoff is the counterintuitive conclusion, that people whose income is correlated to markets should hold less market risk, not more. If you cannot get to that, you have only defined a term.
Expect next
- So should an investment banker hold less equity than a civil servant?
- How would you size term insurance off this?
- How does an employee with heavy ESOPs change your answer?
Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.
