Case 067Options and volatility tradingHard
One-month implied volatility on an index is 30% and your desk forecasts 22% realised. You sell a delta-hedged at-the-money straddle on Rs 10 crore notional. Estimate the expected profit from the gamma-theta relationship, the result if realised volatility is 35% instead, and what can go wrong between hedges.
1The situation
Kovidra Derivatives believes the market is overpricing volatility on a large-cap index. One-month at-the-money options, 21 trading days to expiry, trade at 30% implied volatility. The desk's model forecasts 22% realised volatility over the same month; the last three months realised 20%, 24% and 21%. Interest rates and dividends can be ignored for the month.
The desk proposes selling an at-the-money straddle on Rs 10 crore of index notional and delta-hedging it once a day at the close. The head of the desk asks for the expected profit, the damage if the month turns out at 35%, and a list of what can go wrong between the daily hedges.
2Your task
Price the straddle, estimate the expected profit from the gap between implied and realised volatility, show the daily gamma-theta arithmetic, compute the loss at 35% realised, and name the risks the daily hedge leaves open.
Quick check
Roughly what does the short straddle make if the month realises 22% as forecast?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Expect about Rs 18 lakh if the month realises 22%, and lose about Rs 12 lakh if it realises 35%. The straddle sells for about Rs 69 lakh, roughly Rs 2.3 lakh per volatility point. Day by day it collects Rs 1.64 lakh of theta and pays gamma on each move, breaking even on a 1.89% day. Between hedges a gap, a trend, a rise in implied volatility and the noise in one month's realised volatility can each overturn the edge.
Step 1What does a hedged short straddle actually earn?
An insurer that charges premiums for a 3% claim rate and sees 2% of claims arrive earns the gap, not the premium; the premium mostly pays for claims that do happen. A delta-hedged short straddle is the same business: it earns the difference between the volatility it was sold at and the volatility the index actually realises, because the hedging gives back the part of the premium that pays for real moves. At the money with zero rates, each option is worth about 0.4 times spot times volatility times the square root of time, so the straddle is about 0.8 x 30% x sqrt(21/252) = 6.91% of notional, Rs 69.1 lakh. At 22% it would be worth Rs 50.7 lakh. Hedged at the realised volatility, the profit is exactly the difference: Rs 18.4 lakh, which is also the straddle's vegaThe change in an option position’s value for a one-point change in implied volatility. of about Rs 2.3 lakh per volatility point times the 8-point gap.
Step 2How does that show up day by day in gamma and theta?
Each day the short position collects thetaThe value an option loses per day as time passes, which a short option position collects. and pays for the index's move through gammaThe rate at which an option’s delta changes as the underlying moves; a short gamma position loses on moves in either direction.: the day's profit is theta minus half gamma times the move squared. On the first day theta is about Rs 1.64 lakh, and the position breaks even on a move of 30% / sqrt(252) = 1.89%, the daily move implied volatility is charging for. A day at the forecast 22%, a 1.39% move, earns about Rs 0.76 lakh; a day at 35%, a 2.20% move, loses about Rs 0.59 lakh. Twenty-one days of the first kind give roughly Rs 16 lakh, in line with the Rs 18 lakh from the price difference; gamma grows as expiry approaches, which is why the two do not match exactly.
| \Gamma S^2 | rupee gamma of the straddle; half of it is about Rs 0.46 lakh per one per cent move squared |
| \sigma_{imp}\sqrt{\Delta t} | the daily move implied volatility charges for, 1.89% |
| r | the index's actual move that day |
Step 3What happens if the month realises 35% instead?
The straddle would have been worth about Rs 80.6 lakh at 35%, so the position loses about Rs 11.5 lakh: five points wrong costs more than half of what eight points right would have earned, and the loss has no ceiling. Before trusting the forecast, ask how precisely one month can even measure volatility: with 21 daily returns, the standard error of realised volatility is about 22% / sqrt(42) = 3.4 points, so a month that realises 26% or 27% is ordinary luck even when the forecast is right. The 8-point edge is a little over two standard errors of that noise, which is a good trade to repeat, not a trade to size as if the Rs 18 lakh were in hand.
Step 4What can go wrong between the daily hedges?
First, gaps. The parabola has no floor: a single 5% day costs about Rs 9.9 lakh, roughly the whole expected profit of the month, and an overnight gap cannot be hedged at all. Second, the mark. The desk is paid at expiry, but it is marked every day on implied volatility, and if implied rises from 30% to 35% in a sell-off the position shows a loss of about Rs 12 lakh before realised volatility has had its say, which a risk limit may force it to close at the worst moment. Third, the hedge itself: hedging once a day at the close means a trending day that opens down 1% and closes down 2% is hedged only at the close, and the path between hedges is the gamma loss. Fourth, pin risk in the last days, when gamma near the strike is many times what it was at the start, so the final 2% move costs more than the first. The limitation of the whole estimate is that it treats volatility as a single number for the month; the desk should size the trade to the gap day and to the mark, not to the average.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates often say the trade earns the premium, Rs 69 lakh. Hedged, it earns the difference between implied and realised, about a quarter of that, and the premium is mostly the cost of the moves that do happen.
The second miss is treating the forecast as the outcome. One month of daily data measures volatility to within three or four points, a gap day can erase the month, and the mark-to-market on implied volatility can stop the trade before expiry. The answer the desk wants includes the sizing that follows from those.
What the interviewer asks next
- How would hedging twice a day instead of once change the expected profit and its variance?
- Why might the desk prefer a variance swap or a strangle to express the same view?
- Implied volatility rises to 36% on day three while the index has barely moved. What do you do?
Asked at Old Mission Capital, Prop Trading, Chicago, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): If you think the market is overestimating volatility, what options strategy can you use
Company names and figures are illustrative.
