Case 093Statistical arbitrage and event tradesCore
Analyse a pairs trade in Varnika Paints and Chitrangi Coatings: hedge ratio 1.2, spread z-score 2.3, half-life 12 days, spread standard deviation Rs 8. What are the expected profit, the holding time and a stop level, and what would break the relationship?
1The situation
Tarkshya Capital's screen flags two invented paint makers. Varnika Paints trades at Rs 1,450 and Chitrangi Coatings at Rs 1,180. Over three years the spread, Varnika minus 1.2 times Chitrangi, has been stable around Rs 15.6 with a standard deviation of Rs 8, and it reverts towards its mean with a half-life of 12 trading days.
Today the spread is Rs 34.0, a z-score of 2.3. The portfolio manager asks you to analyse the trade on 10,000 spread units: short 10,000 Varnika and long 12,000 Chitrangi. Costs are 5 basis points a leg each way.
2Your task
Estimate the expected profit, how long the trade is likely to take, where the stop goes and why, and what would break the relationship.
Quick check
With a 12-day half-life, roughly how long until the spread falls from 2.3 to 0.5 on the average path?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Short the spread at z = 2.3 and exit at 0.5: on the average path that takes about 26 days and earns Rs 14.4 a unit, Rs 1.44 lakh on 10,000 units before costs. A stop at z = 4.0 risks Rs 13.6 a unit; if the spread truly mean-reverts, it is hit only about 0.9% of the time, so a hit means the relationship has probably broken. Expected profit after costs is about Rs 1.13 lakh.
Step 1What is the trade, and what does it bet on?
Two neighbouring tea stalls charge almost the same for a cup; if one suddenly charges Rs 5 more, customers drift to the other until the gap closes. A pairs trade bets that two similar companies' prices stay tied, so when the spread between them stretches, you sell the dear one and buy the cheap one and wait for the gap to close. Here Varnika is dear: the spread of Rs 34.0 is 2.3 standard deviations above its mean of Rs 15.6. Short 10,000 Varnika and buy 12,000 Chitrangi; the 1.2 hedge ratio makes the position roughly neutral to the paint sector moving as a whole.
Step 2How long will it take, and what is it worth?
A half-life of 12 days means the expected gap to the mean halves every 12 days: 2.3, then 1.15, then 0.58. To reach an exit at 0.5 takes ln(2.3 / 0.5) / ln 2 half-lives, about 26.4 days on the average path, and captures 1.8 standard deviations, Rs 14.4 a spread unit. On 10,000 units that is Rs 1.44 lakh. Costs at 5 basis points a leg each way on Rs 2,866 of gross exposure a unit come to Rs 2.87 a unit. Individual trades will scatter around 26 days; mean reversion sets the average pace, not the date.
| z t | spread z-score t days after entry, on the average path |
| kappa | speed of mean reversion, ln 2 over the half-life |
| 0.5 | the exit level in standard deviations |
Step 3Where does the stop go, and what does hitting it mean?
Put the stop where the model says the move would be very unlikely, at z = 4.0, a loss of Rs 13.6 a unit. If the spread really reverts with this half-life, the chance of touching 4.0 before 0.5 is only about 0.9%, so reaching the stop is evidence that the relationship itself has changed, and the right response is to get out, not to add. With that probability, the expected profit is about Rs 11.3 a unit after costs, Rs 1.13 lakh in total. Add a time stop too: if the spread is still above 1.0 after three half-lives, 36 days, when the average path would be at 0.29, the half-life estimate is probably wrong.
| Outcome | z at exit | Rs per unit | Rs lakh on 10,000 units | Model probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target reached | 0.5 | +14.4 | +1.44 | 99.1% |
| Stop hit | 4.0 | -13.6 | -1.36 | 0.9% |
| Costs, either way | -2.87 | -0.29 | 100% |
Step 4What would break the relationship?
The statistics describe the past; the economics decide the future. A pair breaks when something hits one company and not the other: an acquisition offer, a new plant or a lost distributor, a raw material that one uses far more than the other, or a shift in mix, such as one moving into industrial coatings while the other stays in home paint. Watch the hedge ratio and half-life on a rolling window; a half-life stretching from 12 days towards 40 is an early warning. Check the news on both names before entry: a 2.3 standard deviation gap that opened on an announcement is information, not noise. The limitation to say plainly: the 0.9% stop probability comes from the model, and the model is exactly what fails when the stop is hit.
Where candidates lose it
The common loss is reading the half-life as the holding period, 12 days. One half-life only halves the gap; reaching an exit near the mean takes more than two.
The second is averaging down when the spread widens towards the stop, because the z-score looks even more attractive. Under the model, a move to 4.0 is rare; when it happens, the likelier story is that the model no longer applies.
What the interviewer asks next
- How would you estimate the half-life from data, and how uncertain is it?
- Varnika announces a buyback the day after you enter. What do you do?
- How would you size this trade against two other pairs with half-lives of 5 and 30 days?
- Why might you set the hedge ratio by dollar neutrality rather than by regression?
Asked at Schonfeld, Quantitative Research, New York, 2021 (Wall Street Oasis): Explain how you would analyze a trade given x scenario.
Company names and figures are illustrative.
