Fin Maverick
Foundations VocabularyAccounting & ReportingEconomics & MacroQuant Methods & ProgrammingBusiness & Company AnalysisCorporate Finance & ValuationBehavioural Finance
Banking & Market InfrastructureFixed Income & RatesDerivatives & Structured ProductsPublic EquitiesTransactions & DealsPortfolio ConstructionFunds & AMCs
Private Markets & AlternativesRisk, Treasury & ControlAI & Digital FinanceStochastic Calculus & PricingWealth & Personal FinanceIndian Markets & RegulationProfessional Practice
CalculatorComparison
Frameworks
Explore Bootcamps
Equity ResearchPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund MasteryInvestment Banking Analyst
Private Equity AnalystQuant & Hedge Fund AnalystBreaking Into VCFinancial Analyst Program
Risk Management ProgramPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsDerivatives Foundation
Explore Free Courses

Equity Research6

Writing an Investment ThesisBuilding a Discounted Cash FlowReading an Annual Report FastReading a Sector Before a CompanySpotting Quality of Earnings Red FlagsBuilding a Revenue Forecast From Drivers

Portfolio Management3

Rebalancing: When, Why and What It CostsStrategic and Tactical Asset AllocationMeasuring Risk in a Portfolio

Mutual Fund Mastery3

Comparing Funds Without Being FooledHow a NAV Is Struck and Which Day You GetReading a Fund Factsheet Properly

Derivatives Unlocked4

Hedging a Real ExposureThe Greeks, PracticallyFutures, the Basis and What Moves ItReading an Option Payoff

AI For Finance2

Retrieval and Grounding for FinanceDocument Extraction in Finance

Breaking Into Quants4

Backtesting a StrategyHypothesis TestingCleaning Financial DataRegression for Finance

Breaking Into VC3

Sizing a MarketReading a Term Sheet as a FounderHow a Venture Round Actually Works

Financial Analyst Program4

Common Size and Trend AnalysisReading a Cash Flow StatementRatio Analysis That Says SomethingBuilding a Working Capital Schedule

Risk Management Program2

Credit Exposure and How It Is ReducedValue at Risk and What It Hides

Investment Banking Analyst3

Precedent Transactions and Why They DifferReading a Term Sheet StructurallyBuilding a Comparable Companies Table

Private Wealth Management3

Tax Aware Portfolio DecisionsBuilding a Client Risk ProfileGoal Based Planning Arithmetic

Debt Capital Markets3

Analysing an Issuer's CreditDuration and What It Does Not Tell YouBond Pricing and Yield Mechanics

Private Equity Analyst2

Fund Waterfalls and CarryThe LBO in Structure

Hedge Funds Analyst2

Short Selling MechanicsLong Short Mechanics
QuarksCourses
Explore Interview Preparation
Investment BankingEquity ResearchVenture CapitalistPrivate EquityHedge Funds
QuantFinancial AnalysisPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsRisk Management
Derivatives FoundationPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund Mastery
PartnershipsShowdown
Log inSign up
Interview tracksAll
1Investment Banking
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
2Equity Research
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
3Venture Capital
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
4Private Equity
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
5Hedge Funds
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
6Quant
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
7Financial Analysis
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
8Private Wealth Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
9Debt Capital Markets
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
10Risk Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
11Derivatives Foundation
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
12Portfolio Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
13Mutual Fund Mastery
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
098

Case 098Market-making gamesCore

Corvinta runs two markets on the same pair of dice: A settles at their sum and B at the first die minus the second. Another player quotes A at 6.5 bid, 7.5 offer and B at -0.5 bid, 0.5 offer. The first die is revealed as 5. Update both fair values and find the trades.

CitadelLondon · 2026

1The situation

The trading game at Corvinta Capital uses two fair dice and two contracts. Contract A pays the sum of the two dice. Contract B pays the first die minus the second. Before anything is rolled, another player makes markets in both: A at 6.5 bid, 7.5 offer and B at -0.5 bid, 0.5 offer, each for up to 10 contracts, and leaves the quotes standing.

The first die is rolled and shows 5. The quotes have not changed. You have a few seconds.

2Your task

Give the new fair value of each contract, say which quotes are now wrong and by how much, state the trades, and show what the two trades do together.

Quick check

After the first die shows 5, what is the fair value of B, the first die minus the second?

Worked solution

Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.

30-second answerThe answer to give first

With the first die at 5, A is worth 5 + 3.5 = 8.5 and B is worth 5 - 3.5 = 1.5; both offers are stale by 1.0, so lift A at 7.5 and lift B at 0.5. Together the two contracts pay (5 + D2) + (5 - D2) = 10 whatever the second die shows, and you paid 8.0, so the pair locks in 2.0 with no risk. Each leg alone carries a standard deviation of 1.71 for an edge of 1.0; the package carries none.

Step 1What are the two contracts worth once the first die is known?

Before the roll, A is the sum of two dice, mean 7 with a standard deviation of 2.42, and B is their difference, mean 0 with the same spread. The other player's quotes, 6.5 to 7.5 and -0.5 to 0.5, sit around those means. Once the first die shows 5, the only uncertainty left is the second die, with mean 3.5, so A = 5 + D2 is worth 8.5 and B = 5 - D2 is worth 1.5. Both have moved up by 1.5, and both are now uniform over six outcomes, A from 6 to 11 and B from -1 to 4, with a standard deviation of 1.71. The quotes are stale on both: A's offer at 7.5 is a full 1.0 below fair, and B's offer at 0.5 is also 1.0 below fair.

The relationship
E[A∣D1=5]=5+3.5=8.5E[B∣D1=5]=5−3.5=1.5A+B=2D1=10E[A \mid D_1 = 5] = 5 + 3.5 = 8.5 \qquad E[B \mid D_1 = 5] = 5 - 3.5 = 1.5 \qquad A + B = 2 D_1 = 10
D1the first die, revealed as 5
3.5the expected value of the second die
A + Bthe package, which equals twice the first die and no longer depends on the second
What it says in wordsReplace the known die with its value and the unknown one with 3.5; the sum of the two contracts is twice the first die and is now certain.
One revealed die moves both fair values, and both offers go staleA = first die plus second dieoutcomes 6 to 1123456789101112stale bid 6.5stale offer 7.5new fair 8.5was 7edge 1.0B = first die minus second dieoutcomes -1 to 4-6-4-20246stale bid -0.5stale offer 0.5new fair 1.5was 0edge 1.0Lift both offers: pay 8.0 for a package worth 10 whatever the second die shows, a lock of 2.0.
At Corvinta the first die at 5 lifts A's fair value from 7 to 8.5 and B's from 0 to 1.5, leaving the stale offers at 7.5 and 0.5 each a full 1.0 below fair, so both are lifted for a package worth 10 against 8.0 paid.
Step 2Why are the two trades better together than apart?

Buying a shop's morning stock and its evening stock separately is two bets on the weather; buying both is a bet on the shop. Contract A is long the second die and contract B is short it, so holding both cancels the second die completely: the package pays 10 with certainty, you paid 8.0, and 2.0 is locked in before the second die is rolled. Each leg on its own has an edge of 1.0 against a standard deviation of 1.71, a fine trade but a coin-flip-sized one; the pair has an edge of 2.0 and no variance, so you take the maximum size the other player allows. The table runs through every value of the second die to show the arithmetic never changes.

Second dieA paysB paysA + BProfit on 8.0 paid
16410+2.0
27310+2.0
38210+2.0
49110+2.0
510010+2.0
611-110+2.0
Corvinta's package after the first die shows 5: A pays 5 plus the second die and B pays 5 minus it, so the pair pays 10 on every roll and the 8.0 paid for both offers locks in 2.0.
A rises, B falls, and the package is flat at 10 whatever the second die shows04812123456A = 5 + D2B = 5 - D2A + B = 10, certainpaid 8.0 for the packageSecond dieEach leg alone has edge 1.0 with a standard deviation of 1.71; together the edge is 2.0 with no risk.
Across the six values of the second die, A rises from 6 to 11 and B falls from 4 to -1, and their sum is flat at 10, two above the 8.0 paid; each leg alone has edge 1.0 with standard deviation 1.71, the pair has edge 2.0 with none.
Step 3What did the stale quotes say about the first die?

Read the two markets together before the roll and they already contain a claim. Since A + B = 2 D1, the two quotes together say twice the first die is worth between 6.0 and 8.0, that is, the first die is between 3 and 4. Any revealed value of 1, 2, 5 or 6, four faces in six, puts the package outside that band and hands you a lock: with a 5 or 6 you lift both offers, with a 1 or 2 you hit both bids. A first die of 2, for instance, makes A worth 5.5 and B worth -1.5; hitting both bids collects 6.0 for a package that will cost you 2 x 2 = 4 to settle, the same lock of 2.0. A quote that is one point wide on a contract with a standard deviation of 2.4 was too tight to begin with; leaving it standing through a reveal is the real error, and it is the one you are being tested on spotting from the other side. The limitation: the lock assumes both trades fill at the quoted size; if the other player pulls one quote after you lift the first, you hold a single leg with edge 1.0 and a standard deviation of 1.71, so lift the leg with the larger size first.

Where candidates lose it

The common loss is updating A and forgetting B, or updating B to 5 by treating the second die as zero. Both contracts move by the same 1.5 because both contain the first die with a plus sign; only the second die differs in sign.

The second is trading the legs as two separate bets and sizing each for its risk. Together they have no risk, which changes the size from cautious to maximum.

What the interviewer asks next

  • If the first die shows 3, is there any trade, and what does that say about the quotes?
  • How would you quote A and B yourself after the reveal, and should the widths be equal?
  • A third contract C pays the product of the dice: what is it worth after a 5, and does it hedge against A or B?
  • What if the other player can refuse your second trade: which leg do you take first and why?

Asked at Citadel, Quantitative Research, London, 2026 (Wall Street Oasis): 3rd I got rejected it was different brainteasers and trading game

← Case 097Vairagi's 99% one-day VaR was exceeded 8 times in 250 days, against 2.5 expected. Is the model wrong? Use the binomial distribution and the traffic-light idea to decide.Case 099 →At Tessorin, a random forest on 50 features scores a training R-squared of 35% and a test R-squared of -0.8% on daily returns, while a three-feature ridge model scores 0.6% and 0.4%. Explain the gap, choose a model, and say how you would set the number of trees and the depth.

Company names and figures are illustrative.

Fin Maverick Free CoursesExplore Free Courses
Fin Maverick BootcampsExplore Bootcamps
Fin Maverick

Finance education that ends in a job, not a certificate that gathers dust. Built for young India.

LEARN
CalculatorsFrameworksComparisonsInterview RoadmapsShowdown
RESOURCES
All CoursesFree CoursesBootcampsInternships
COMPANY
AboutJob openingPartnership
LEGAL
Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsContent LicenseReturn & Refund Policy
© 2026 FIN MAVERICK / BUILT FOR INDIA.DO FINANCE, DO NOT JUST READ ABOUT IT.