Case 001Capital and regulationCore
Kirvanta Bank's exposure to one business group has crept above the large exposure limit. Measure the breach and choose between selling down, taking collateral and raising capital.
1The situation
Kirvanta Bank has Tier 1 capital of Rs 12,000 crore. Across its books it has Rs 3,200 crore of exposure to one business group: Rs 2,000 crore of loans to three group companies, Rs 700 crore of the group's bonds in the treasury book and Rs 500 crore of guarantees issued on the group's behalf.
For this case, use an illustrative group exposure limit of 25% of Tier 1 capital and count guarantees in full. Confirm the current limit and the conversion factors for off-balance sheet items against the regulator's large exposure rules before relying on either. Assume eligible collateral, such as government securities, reduces exposure after an illustrative 5% haircut.
2Your task
How large is the breach, what would each of the three fixes cost, and which would you put in front of the credit committee?
Quick check
If Kirvanta cured the breach by raising Tier 1 capital alone, how much new capital would it need?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Kirvanta is at 26.7% of Tier 1 against a 25% limit, Rs 200 crore over. Selling Rs 200 crore of exposure or taking about Rs 211 crore of eligible collateral cures it; raising capital needs Rs 800 crore, four times the excess, and takes months. Sell down the bonds first, freeze new lending to the group, and aim below the line, not on it.
Step 1How do you measure the breach before anyone argues about it?
Add every rupee that disappears if the group fails, wherever it sits in the bank. Think of a friend who owes you money, has borrowed your car and asked you to stand surety for a flat: if they vanish, you lose on all three at once. Loans, bonds and guarantees to one group are one exposure, because one default hits all of them together. Rs 2,000 plus 700 plus 500 is Rs 3,200 crore, which is 26.7% of Rs 12,000 crore. The limit is Rs 3,000 crore, so the excess is Rs 200 crore.
Group means the connected counterparties together: companies under common control, or so economically dependent that one cannot fail alone. That is why the three group companies are added, not tested one by one. The point of a large exposure limitA cap on how much a bank can lose to one borrower or connected group, set as a share of its capital, so a single failure cannot sink the bank. is that no single failure should be able to take out a quarter of the bank's loss-absorbing capital.
Step 2Why does the capital route cost four times as much?
Because capital sits under the line of the ratio and exposure sits above it. Each rupee of new Tier 1 makes room for only 25 paise of exposure, so a Rs 200 crore excess needs Rs 800 crore of capital. Raising that much also takes a board decision, shareholder approval and months of market work, and nobody raises equity to accommodate one client. The capital route belongs in the answer only to be ruled out with a number.
| Fix | Rupees needed | Speed | What it leaves behind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sell down bonds or loan participations | 200 | Days to weeks | A possible loss on sale; relationship strain |
| Take eligible collateral | about 211 | Weeks | Collateral to value, hold and top up |
| Raise Tier 1 capital | 800 | Months | Dilution for shareholders to fit one client |
Step 3Which fix would you actually propose?
Start with the Rs 700 crore of group bonds in the treasury book. Bonds are the fastest exposure to shrink because they can be sold in the market without renegotiating anything with the client. Selling Rs 200 crore of them cures the breach in days. Collateral is the second line: if the group can pledge government securities against part of the loans, about Rs 211 crore at a 5% haircut removes the same Rs 200 crore of exposure, but only if the collateral meets the rule's eligibility tests.
Then say what a sell-down to exactly 25% leaves: no headroom. A guarantee called, a bond revalued or one more drawdown puts the bank back in breach next week. Most banks run an internal ceiling a few points under the regulatory one for this reason. Close with the process: freeze new group exposure, report the breach under the bank's escalation policy, and agree a dated plan to get below the internal ceiling.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates test each group company separately, find each one well inside the limit, and conclude there is no breach. The rule looks at the connected group, because the companies fail together.
The second loss is proposing a capital raise as if it cured the breach rupee for rupee. The limit is a ratio: capital buys only a quarter of its value in room, which is why it is the last fix, not the first.
What the interviewer asks next
- The guarantees are performance guarantees rather than financial guarantees. How might that change the exposure measure?
- The group wants a new Rs 300 crore loan next quarter. What do you say?
- How would you decide whether two companies with a common promoter belong in one group?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
