Risk Management interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

37

Firms

12

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsUBS14MSCI7BLBlackRock5FTFranklin Templeton3Oaktree Capital Management2Scotiabank2Jane Street1Moody's1Neuberger Berman1PIMCO1SSState Street1TSTruist Securities1

Topic

All topicsMarket risk and VaR14Tail risk and stress testing5Greeks and sensitivities5Credit risk11Counterparty risk and CVA6Operational risk5Model risk and validation6Regulatory capital7Liquidity risk and ALM6Statistics and quant foundations7Indian regulation7Risk governance and appetite4Markets and macro9Fit and career8

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseBrainteaserMarket viewFit

1. 088What is an ETF, and how does it differ from a mutual fund?Markets and macroCorephone / first roundFTFranklin TempletonRisk Management · San Mateo · 2017PIMCOCompliance · Los Angeles · 2024

   Say this

   Both are pooled funds. The difference is the plumbing: an ETF trades on an exchange all day at a market price, and a mutual fund transacts once a day directly with the fund at net asset value. That one structural difference drives everything else.

   Then walk it

   1. The mechanism that keeps an ETF near fair value is creation and redemption. Authorised participants can exchange a basket of the underlying securities for ETF shares and back again, so if the ETF trades above NAV they create and sell, which arbitrages the premium away.
   2. Consequences of that: ETFs are usually cheaper, they're typically more tax-efficient because in-kind redemption avoids realising gains in the fund, they offer intraday liquidity, and they're transparent on holdings daily.
   3. Mutual funds in exchange get no intraday pricing, but they can take flows in cash, which suits regular investing, and in India the SIP model is built on exactly that.
   4. The risk-management points that matter, and this is where a risk interview goes. The arbitrage mechanism depends on the underlying being tradeable. For a bond ETF in a stressed market the ETF price becomes the price discovery mechanism and the NAV is the stale number, so an ETF trading at a discount is often telling you the truth about the underlying.
   5. Then liquidity mismatch risk: an ETF offering intraday liquidity on illiquid underlyings, high yield, emerging market debt, small caps, shifts the liquidity cost from the fund to the seller through the discount. That's arguably better than a mutual fund where redeeming investors impose costs on those who stay.
   6. Also securities lending revenue, counterparty risk in synthetic and swap-based ETFs, tracking difference against tracking error, and concentration risk in the authorised participant network, which is a small number of firms.
   7. Indian specifics: ETFs are a smaller share of the market than in the US, EPFO allocations have driven a lot of Nifty ETF assets, and liquidity in many Indian ETFs is thin enough that the bid-offer matters more than the expense ratio. That's a real point for an Indian investor and a real risk point too.

   Where candidates lose it

   Stopping at 'ETFs trade on an exchange'. That's the fact; the creation-redemption mechanism is the explanation, and it's what the follow-up will target. For a risk role, add the liquidity mismatch point, because bond ETFs in March 2020 are the case study the interviewer has in mind.

   Expect next

   • What keeps an ETF's price close to NAV?
   • Why did bond ETFs trade at discounts in March 2020?
   • What are the risks in a synthetic ETF?

   Reported by candidates at Franklin Templeton (Risk Management, San Mateo, 2017); PIMCO (Compliance, Los Angeles, 2024). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.