Fin Maverick
Foundations VocabularyAccounting & ReportingEconomics & MacroQuant Methods & ProgrammingBusiness & Company AnalysisCorporate Finance & ValuationBehavioural Finance
Banking & Market InfrastructureFixed Income & RatesDerivatives & Structured ProductsPublic EquitiesTransactions & DealsPortfolio ConstructionFunds & AMCs
Private Markets & AlternativesRisk, Treasury & ControlAI & Digital FinanceStochastic Calculus & PricingWealth & Personal FinanceIndian Markets & RegulationProfessional Practice
CalculatorComparison
Frameworks
Explore Bootcamps
Equity ResearchPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund MasteryInvestment Banking Analyst
Private Equity AnalystQuant & Hedge Fund AnalystBreaking Into VCFinancial Analyst Program
Risk Management ProgramPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsDerivatives Foundation
Explore Free Courses

Equity Research6

Writing an Investment ThesisBuilding a Discounted Cash FlowReading an Annual Report FastReading a Sector Before a CompanySpotting Quality of Earnings Red FlagsBuilding a Revenue Forecast From Drivers

Portfolio Management3

Rebalancing: When, Why and What It CostsStrategic and Tactical Asset AllocationMeasuring Risk in a Portfolio

Mutual Fund Mastery3

Comparing Funds Without Being FooledHow a NAV Is Struck and Which Day You GetReading a Fund Factsheet Properly

Derivatives Unlocked4

Hedging a Real ExposureThe Greeks, PracticallyFutures, the Basis and What Moves ItReading an Option Payoff

AI For Finance2

Retrieval and Grounding for FinanceDocument Extraction in Finance

Breaking Into Quants4

Backtesting a StrategyHypothesis TestingCleaning Financial DataRegression for Finance

Breaking Into VC3

Sizing a MarketReading a Term Sheet as a FounderHow a Venture Round Actually Works

Financial Analyst Program4

Common Size and Trend AnalysisReading a Cash Flow StatementRatio Analysis That Says SomethingBuilding a Working Capital Schedule

Risk Management Program2

Credit Exposure and How It Is ReducedValue at Risk and What It Hides

Investment Banking Analyst3

Precedent Transactions and Why They DifferReading a Term Sheet StructurallyBuilding a Comparable Companies Table

Private Wealth Management3

Tax Aware Portfolio DecisionsBuilding a Client Risk ProfileGoal Based Planning Arithmetic

Debt Capital Markets3

Analysing an Issuer's CreditDuration and What It Does Not Tell YouBond Pricing and Yield Mechanics

Private Equity Analyst2

Fund Waterfalls and CarryThe LBO in Structure

Hedge Funds Analyst2

Short Selling MechanicsLong Short Mechanics
QuarksCourses
Explore Interview Preparation
Investment BankingEquity ResearchVenture CapitalistPrivate EquityHedge Funds
QuantFinancial AnalysisPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsRisk Management
Derivatives FoundationPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund Mastery
PartnershipsShowdown
Log inSign up
Interview tracksAll
1Investment Banking
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
2Equity Research
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
3Venture Capital
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
4Private Equity
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
5Hedge Funds
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
6Quant
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
7Financial Analysis
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
8Private Wealth Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
9Debt Capital Markets
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
10Risk Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
11Derivatives Foundation
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
12Portfolio Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
13Mutual Fund Mastery
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
069

Case 069Term sheets and waterfallsHard

Sarthavik Mobility has two Series B term sheets: a lower price with clean terms, or a higher price with a participating preference and a full ratchet. Compare the founders' proceeds at three exits and after a later down round.

1The situation

Sarthavik Mobility runs electric bus routes for companies' staff. It is raising a Rs 50 crore Series B and has two term sheets. Fund X offers a Rs 100 crore pre-money valuation with a 1x non-participating liquidation preference and standard broad-based weighted average anti-dilution. Fund Y offers Rs 130 crore pre-money with a 1.5x participating preference and full-ratchet anti-dilution.

For simplicity, the founders own all shares before the round, 1 crore shares, and there are no other investors or options. Compare exits of Rs 150, 400 and 1,000 crore, then a later Rs 30 crore round at half the Series B price.

2Your task

Which term sheet leaves the founders better off, at which exits, and what happens after a down round?

Quick check

At a Rs 400 crore exit, which term sheet pays the founders more?

Worked solution

Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.

30-second answerThe answer to give first

Fund X's lower price pays the founders more at every exit below about Rs 975 crore. At Rs 150 crore founders get Rs 100 crore under X and Rs 54 crore under Y; at Rs 400 crore, Rs 267 crore against Rs 235 crore; at Rs 1,000 crore the two are within Rs 1.4 crore. After a later round at half price, Y's full ratchet doubles its shares, and at a Rs 400 crore exit founders would get about Rs 183 crore under X against Rs 146 crore under Y.

Step 1What does each term sheet give the investor?

Imagine two people offering to fund your shop. One wants a third of the profits, or his money back if you close. The other wants slightly less than a third, but also one and a half times his money back first in any sale, before sharing the rest. Fund X buys a third of Sarthavik, 50 over 150, and takes either Rs 50 crore or its third, whichever is larger; Fund Y buys 27.8%, 50 over 180, but takes Rs 75 crore first and then its 27.8% of what is left. That second structure, a participating preferenceA liquidation preference after which the investor also shares in the remaining proceeds as if it had converted, so it is paid twice on the same shares., is why the higher headline can pay founders less.

Step 2What do founders receive at Rs 150, 400 and 1,000 crore?

Under Fund X, at Rs 150 crore the fund is indifferent between Rs 50 crore and its third, so founders get Rs 100 crore; above that it converts and founders keep two thirds. Under Fund Y, founders always get 72.2% of the exit less Rs 75 crore: Rs 54.2 crore at 150, Rs 234.7 crore at 400 and Rs 668.1 crore at 1,000. The two lines meet where two thirds of the exit equals 72.2% of the exit less Rs 75 crore, at about Rs 975 crore. Below that, the founders give up more to participation than they gain from the higher price.

Exit, Rs croreFund X takesFounders under XFund Y takesFounders under Y
15050.0100.095.854.2
400133.3266.7165.3234.7
1,000333.3666.7331.9668.1
At exits of Rs 150 and 400 crore the founders keep Rs 46 crore and Rs 32 crore more under Fund X; only at Rs 1,000 crore, above the Rs 975 crore crossing, does Fund Y's higher price pay them slightly more.
Founders' proceeds by exit value: the higher price pays less until about Rs 975 crore20040060080002004006008001,0001,200Exit value, Rs croreX: 100Y: 54X: 267Y: 235Cross at Rs 975 croreFund X: Rs 100 crore pre, 1x non-participatingFund Y: Rs 130 crore pre, 1.5x participating
Founders' proceeds under Fund X's Rs 100 crore pre-money and clean preference lie above those under Fund Y's Rs 130 crore pre-money and 1.5x participating preference at every exit up to about Rs 975 crore, where the two lines cross.
Step 3What happens after a later round at half the price?

Suppose Sarthavik later raises Rs 30 crore at half the Series B price. Under X, the round is at Rs 50 a share and weighted average moves Fund X's conversion price from Rs 100 to about Rs 85.71, so its 50 lakh shares become 58.3 lakh. Under Y, the round is at Rs 65 and the full ratchet resets Fund Y's price all the way down, doubling its shares from 38.5 lakh to 76.9 lakh. Founders end at 45.8% under X and 44.8% under Y. At a later Rs 400 crore exit where everyone converts under X, founders get about Rs 183 crore; under Y, Fund Y still takes its Rs 75 crore first, leaving founders about Rs 146 crore.

A later round at half the price: the full ratchet doubles Fund Y's sharesFund X, beforefounders 66.7%Founders 100150 lakhFund X, after (WA)founders 45.8%Founders 100new 60218 lakhFund Y, beforefounders 72.2%Founders 100138 lakhFund Y, after (ratchet)founders 44.8%Founders 100new 46223 lakhAnti-dilution shares to the Series B fund (shares in lakh)
After a Rs 30 crore round at half the Series B price, Fund X's weighted average adds 8.3 lakh shares and founders fall from 66.7% to 45.8%, while Fund Y's full ratchet adds 38.5 lakh, doubling its holding, and founders fall from 72.2% to 44.8%.
Step 4Which term sheet should the founders take?

Fund X's, unless they are confident of an exit well above Rs 1,000 crore with no down round on the way. Fund Y's 30% higher headline is paid for with participation, which costs the founders money at every realistic exit, and a ratchet, which costs them most exactly when things go badly. A founder who takes Y is betting on the best case to win a vanity number. If they prefer Y's investor for other reasons, the trade to ask for is clean terms at a price in between, or participation capped at a total return of, say, 2x, after which Fund Y must choose between its preference and converting. The limitation: this ignores who the two funds are, and the better partner can be worth more than these differences.

Where candidates lose it

The usual miss is comparing pre-money valuations and choosing Rs 130 crore. Valuation is the price of the shares; the preference and anti-dilution terms decide how much of each rupee of exit the founders actually keep.

The second is treating a 1.5x participating preference like a 1.5x non-participating one. Participation means Fund Y never has to choose; it takes its Rs 75 crore and its share of the rest, which is why its line sits below Fund X's for so long.

What the interviewer asks next

  • Fund Y agrees to cap participation at 3x its money. Where do the lines cross now?
  • Why do later-stage investors ask for a ratchet, and when would a founder accept one?
  • How would the comparison change if earlier investors held non-participating preferences too?
← Case 068Get grilled on a company of your choosing: Rakshavik Cyber. Defend its metrics, size the three biggest risks, and explain what its last round's terms mean for the fund if the next round is flat.Case 070 →What is a trend you see in an industry of interest? Take rooftop solar for small factories: size the yearly install market as adoption climbs an S-curve, find when it peaks, and say what share Suryavik Energy would need for Rs 500 crore of revenue.

Company names and figures are illustrative.

Fin Maverick Free CoursesExplore Free Courses
Fin Maverick BootcampsExplore Bootcamps
Fin Maverick

Finance education that ends in a job, not a certificate that gathers dust. Built for young India.

LEARN
CalculatorsFrameworksComparisonsInterview RoadmapsShowdown
RESOURCES
All CoursesFree CoursesBootcampsInternships
COMPANY
AboutJob openingPartnership
LEGAL
Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsContent LicenseReturn & Refund Policy
© 2026 FIN MAVERICK / BUILT FOR INDIA.DO FINANCE, DO NOT JUST READ ABOUT IT.