Case 080Exits and secondariesCore
An acquirer wants Lekhvik Legal Tech, which has Rs 60 crore of revenue at EBITDA break-even. With Rs 25 crore of cost synergies and Rs 15 crore of revenue synergies at a 40% margin, phased in over two years at a 15% discount rate, what is the most it should pay, and where would you anchor as the seller's adviser?
1The situation
Lekhvik Legal Tech sells contract management software to law firms and corporate legal teams. It has Rs 60 crore of revenue and runs at EBITDA break-even. Your fund owns part of it and sits on the board. A larger legal software company has approached to buy it.
The buyer's team expects Rs 25 crore a year of cost savings, mostly duplicated sales, hosting and back office, and Rs 15 crore a year of extra revenue from selling Lekhvik to its own clients, at a 40% margin. Half of each arrives in year one and all of it from year two, and lasts. The buyer uses a 15% discount rate. Recent sales of similar break-even software companies suggest Lekhvik is worth about 3x revenue on its own. Ignore tax and integration cost to keep the arithmetic clean.
2Your task
What is the most the buyer should pay, and where would you open as the seller's adviser?
Quick check
Which part of the synergy value should the seller find hardest to claim?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
The buyer's ceiling is about Rs 373 crore, and I would anchor near Rs 300 crore. Lekhvik is worth Rs 180 crore alone. Phased cost synergies are worth about Rs 156 crore today and revenue synergies about Rs 37 crore. Rs 300 crore claims about three quarters of the cost savings and none of the revenue synergies, which leaves the buyer Rs 73 crore of value and a reason to say yes.
Step 1What sets the most a buyer can pay?
A neighbour who wants to knock two flats into one will pay more for yours than any outside buyer, because the combined flat is worth more than two separate ones. But the neighbour will not pay away all of that extra value, or there is no point doing it. The buyer's ceiling is the target's standalone value plus the present value of the synergiesExtra profit the combined company earns that neither would earn alone, from shared costs or cross-selling.; pay more than that and the buyer's own shareholders lose. The seller's job is to claim a share of the synergies without assuming all of them.
Step 2What are the synergies worth today?
The revenue synergy is Rs 15 crore of sales at a 40% margin, so Rs 6 crore of profit. Each stream pays half in year one and the full amount every year after. Discounting at 15%, the cost savings are worth about Rs 155.8 crore and the revenue synergies about Rs 37.4 crore, Rs 193.2 crore in all. The year-two-onward stream is a perpetuity, the annual amount divided by 15%, then discounted one year because it starts a year out.
| Rs crore | Cost savings | Revenue synergy profit | Discount factor | Present value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 12.5 | 3.0 | 0.870 | 13.5 |
| Year 2 onwards, forever | 25.0 | 6.0 | 6.667 / 1.15 | 179.7 |
| Present value | 155.8 | 37.4 | 193.2 |
Step 3Where should the seller's adviser anchor, and why there?
Anchor on the synergies the buyer controls. Rs 300 crore is standalone value plus about 77% of the cost savings, and it asks for nothing on revenue synergies, which the buyer's team will discount anyway. It is high enough to leave room to concede, and defensible line by line: every rupee above Rs 180 crore points at a saving the buyer's own team named. A more realistic landing zone is between Rs 258 crore, half the cost savings, and Rs 300 crore.
Say the limit out loud. The ceiling assumes every saving arrives and lasts forever; ignoring phasing alone would push it to Rs 387 crore, which is why sellers like to quote the unphased number. Integration costs, customer churn during the merger and tax would all lower it. The seller's adviser should also check for a second bidder: without competition, the buyer has little reason to share more than a slice of cost savings.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates add the full synergies to standalone value and call Rs 373 crore the price. That is the buyer's walk-away number, not the price; a buyer paying its ceiling creates nothing for its own shareholders.
The second miss is treating revenue synergies as equal to cost savings. They depend on customers and on the buyer's sales team, so a seller who leans on them looks naive.
What the interviewer asks next
- The buyer insists on a Rs 20 crore integration cost. How does the ceiling move?
- How would an earn-out tied to revenue synergies change your anchor?
- A financial buyer with no synergies bids Rs 200 crore. How do you use that bid?
- Your fund holds a 1x preference of Rs 150 crore. Which prices matter most to you?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
