Case 072Private credit and direct lendingHard
Overnight case study: an aviation services company offers a second lien loan behind a larger first lien. Build base and downside cases, compute value cover at 6x and 4x EBITDA, and give an invest or pass view.
1The situation
Harnavi Aviation Services provides ground handling, aircraft maintenance and airport lounges. Its sponsor seeks a Rs 400 crore second lien loan at 13% to refinance a shareholder loan. It ranks behind Rs 800 crore of first lien debt at 9%. EBITDA is Rs 280 crore; depreciation is Rs 50 crore, capex Rs 60 crore and tax 25% of profit after interest.
Aviation services businesses have traded between about 4x and 8x EBITDA over the cycle. A downside case assumes a traffic shock cuts EBITDA by a quarter, to Rs 210 crore. You present to the investment committee tomorrow morning.
2Your task
What do leverage, cover and free cash flow look like in each case, how well is the second lien covered by enterprise value at 6x and 4x, and would you invest?
Quick check
At 4x EBITDA of Rs 280 crore, how much of the Rs 400 crore second lien is covered?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Pass at Rs 400 crore: the second lien is fully covered at 6x but only 80% at 4x, and in the downside it is 10% covered at 4x. Total leverage is 4.29x, cover 2.26x, falling to 1.69x if EBITDA drops a quarter. The loan is whole only above 4.29x on today's EBITDA. At Rs 300 crore, whole down to 3.93x, it would be investable at 13% with a leverage covenant.
Step 1How much value sits between the first lien and the second?
Think of a house with two mortgages. The first bank is repaid from the sale before the second sees a rupee, so the second lender's safety is how far the house price can fall before its slice is reached. A second lienA loan secured on the same assets as the first lien but paid only after the first lien is repaid in full. is protected only by the value above the first lien, so its risk turns on the enterprise value multiple more than on this year's cash flow. At 6x of Rs 280 crore, value is Rs 1,680 crore, Rs 880 crore above the first lien, covering the second lien 2.2 times. At 4x, value is Rs 1,120 crore: Rs 320 crore for a Rs 400 crore claim.
Step 2What do the base and downside cases show?
| Rs crore | Base | Downside |
|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | 280 | 210 |
| Interest: 9% on 800, 13% on 400 | 124 | 124 |
| EBITDA / interest | 2.26x | 1.69x |
| Total debt / EBITDA | 4.29x | 5.71x |
| Free cash flow after capex and tax | 69.5 | 17.0 |
| Second lien covered at 6x | 100% | 100% |
| Second lien covered at 4x | 80% | 10% |
The loan pays its interest in both cases; the danger is not a missed coupon but a sale or restructuring at a low multiple in the downside. A traffic shock that cuts EBITDA to Rs 210 crore is also the moment buyers pay 4x rather than 6x, so the two stresses arrive together. In that corner the second lien recovers Rs 40 crore of Rs 400 crore. The 13% coupon pays about 4% a year more than the first lien; over a three-year life that is roughly 12 points of extra income, set against a possible loss of up to 90 points in the bad corner.
Step 3What do you tell the committee?
Give the view, the reason and the terms that would change it. Pass as offered: at Rs 400 crore the second lien is whole only above 4.29x on today's EBITDA, inside the range this sector has traded through, and the downside pairs lower EBITDA with a lower multiple. Invest at Rs 300 crore, which is whole down to 3.93x, with a total leverage maintenance covenant, call protection of 102 and 101, and a limit on further first lien borrowing so the cushion cannot be filled in from above. Name what would move the view: long contracts with airports and airlines that make EBITDA stickier, or a sponsor willing to put in equity alongside the loan.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates check that interest is covered, see 2.26x, and invest. A second lien rarely fails on its coupon; it fails when value is realised at a low multiple, which is why cover must be measured in enterprise value, not just EBITDA.
The second miss is running the downside on one variable only. In a traffic shock EBITDA and the multiple fall together, so the bad corner is lower EBITDA at a lower multiple.
What the interviewer asks next
- What coupon would make the Rs 400 crore second lien attractive to you, and how did you get there?
- The first lien has a Rs 100 crore undrawn revolver ranking ahead of you. Does that change your view?
- Would you rather hold the second lien or buy the first lien at 97?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
