Case 026Stock pitchHard
One-week take-home: pitch Ashvik Logistics, an asset-light contract logistics company. Give three thesis pillars and cross-check value with a DCF and a peer multiple.
1The situation
Ashvik Logistics runs warehouses and trucking for manufacturers and retailers, but owns few assets: it leases its warehouses and hires most of its trucks. Revenue is Rs 4,200 crore and EBIT is Rs 315 crore, a 7.5% margin, on capital employed of Rs 1,432 crore, a ROCE of 22%. Warehousing and value-added services are 25% of revenue at a 15% EBIT margin; transport is 75% at 5%.
Ashvik has net cash of Rs 300 crore earning Rs 20 crore a year, tax is 25%, and profit after tax is Rs 251 crore on 25 crore shares: EPS of Rs 10.05. The shares trade at Rs 281, 28x trailing earnings. Listed peers trade at 20x to 24x next year's earnings, and Ashvik's own trailing P/E has ranged from 22x to 30x over five years. Your base case: revenue growth of 18% easing to 14% by year 5, EBIT margin rising half a point a year to 10%, Rs 1 of new capital for every Rs 3.5 of new revenue, a cost of capital of 11% and terminal growth of 6%.
2Your task
What are your three pillars, what value range do a DCF and a peer multiple give, and what does the price already assume?
Quick check
Your base DCF gives Rs 252 against a price of Rs 281. What is the most useful next step?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Ashvik is a good business at a full price: a DCF and two multiples agree on roughly Rs 250 to 300 a share, and Rs 281 sits inside that range. The pillars are outsourcing-led volume growth, growth that funds itself at a 22% ROCE, and a margin lift from warehousing mix. The base DCF gives Rs 252; the price already assumes a year-5 margin near 11.2%, so the pitch turns on how fast warehousing grows.
Step 1What are the three pillars, and what must each one prove?
Think of a caterer who rents kitchens instead of building them. Every new client adds revenue without a new building, so the caterer grows on very little money of its own, and the clients who want a full canteen service pay more than the ones who only want food delivered. Ashvik is that caterer. A thesis pillar is only a pillar if it maps to one line in your model and to evidence someone could check. Strong management and a large market are not pillars; they are adjectives.
| Pillar | Model line it drives | Evidence to show | What breaks it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Manufacturers outsource more logistics | Revenue growth, 18% easing to 14% | Contract wins, renewal rates, share of top 20 clients growing | A large client takes logistics back in-house |
| 2. Asset-light growth funds itself | Rs 1 of capital per Rs 3.5 of new revenue | Lease terms, capex under 2% of revenue, ROCE held at 22% | Clients demand owned, dedicated warehouses |
| 3. Mix shifts to warehousing | EBIT margin from 7.5% to 10% | Warehousing share rising from 25% towards 50% of revenue | Warehouse rents rise faster than contract prices |
Step 2What does the DCF say, and how much of it is terminal value?
Free cash flow each year is after-tax operating profit less the capital needed to grow: new revenue divided by 3.5. On the base case that gives Rs 81, 129, 189, 263, 352 crore over the five years. Growth after year 5 needs reinvestment too: at 6% growth and a 16.5% after-tax return on new capital, a little over a third of profit is reinvested every year. The base DCF gives Rs 252 a share, and 88% of the operating value sits in the terminal valueThe value of all cash flows after the last forecast year, usually computed as next year cash flow divided by the discount rate less the long-run growth rate.. That share is normal for a company still growing at 14%, and it is why you never quote a DCF as a point.
| PV 1-5 | present value of free cash flow in years 1 to 5, Rs crore |
| PV TV | present value of the terminal value at 11%, Rs crore |
| cash | net cash of Rs 300 crore |
| shares | 25 crore shares |
Step 3Does a peer multiple agree with the DCF?
Next year's EPS on the base case is about Rs 12.49. Peers at 20x to 24x put Ashvik at Rs 250 to 300, and its own five-year band of 22x to 30x trailing earnings gives Rs 221 to 302. Running the DCF across discount rates of 10.5% to 11.5% and terminal growth of 5.5% to 6.5% gives Rs 219 to 299. Two methods built on different information that land in the same place are the strongest evidence a pitch can offer for a value range.
Step 4What does the price already assume?
Turn the DCF round and solve for the margin that makes it equal the price. Rs 281 needs Ashvik to reach an EBIT margin of about 11.2% by year 5, more than your 10% base. Each extra half point of year-5 margin is worth about Rs 13 a share, and if the margin stays flat at 7.5% the value falls to Rs 187. A 10% margin already needs warehousing to reach about half of revenue; 11.2% needs more.
Close the pitch with a view and the test that would change it. A strong close sounds like this: a high-return business whose growth pays for itself, priced for slightly more margin progress than the base case, so the case for owning it rests on pillar 3. The one data point to watch is the warehousing share of revenue over the next four quarters; above the path to half of revenue, the price is justified, and below it, the stock is paying for a mix shift that has not happened.
Where candidates lose it
The common loss is presenting the DCF as a precise answer, Rs 252 so the stock is 10% overvalued, when half a point on the discount rate moves the value by more than that gap. The interviewer reads it as someone who does not know how soft the inputs are.
The second is writing pillars as praise, good management and a large market, with no model line and no evidence attached. A pillar nobody could disprove is not an argument, and the panel will ask what would make you wrong.
What the interviewer asks next
- Your largest client, 9% of revenue, announces it will bring logistics in-house. Which pillar breaks and by how much?
- Why does ROCE matter more than the P/E for an asset-light compounder?
- How would you check the 16.5% return on new capital used in the terminal value?
- What would make you pitch this stock as a short instead?
Asked at Wellington Management, Equity Research, Boston, 2024 (Wall Street Oasis): followed by a final case which was a stock pitch due in 1 week
Company names and figures are illustrative.
