Equity Research interview preparation
Sell side and buy side. Every question is either traced to a named firm from a public candidate report, or tagged at desk level when we could not trace it. Answers lead with the point, then the mechanism, then the limitation.
100 questions, mapped to the firms that asked them
- Questions
- 100
- Traced to a firm
- 72
- Firms
- 45
- Updated
- September 2026
004Pitch me a stock.Man GroupEquity Hedge · London · 2016Morgan StanleySales and Trading · Tokyo · 2025Balyasny Asset ManagementGeneralist · New York · 2020
Say this
Recommendation and target first, business in two sentences, then the variant view, the catalyst, the risk, and what would make you wrong. Ninety seconds, and the variant view is the only part that counts.
Then walk it
- Open with the trade: 'Long X at 40, target 55, about 35 percent upside over 12 to 18 months.' Never build up to the recommendation.
- Two sentences on what the business actually does, so the interviewer knows you are not pitching a ticker.
- The variant view: what do you believe that consensus does not, and why are you right? 'The street models 8 percent growth; I think it is 14 because the new contract has not been added to numbers yet.' Quantify the gap.
- The catalyst and timing: what makes the market agree with you, and roughly when. A view with no catalyst is a value trap.
- Valuation: what multiple you are paying, what the peers trade at, what the reverse DCF implies.
- Risks and the falsifier: the two things that break the thesis, and the specific data point you would watch. Ending on what would make you wrong is what makes an analyst sound honest rather than promotional.
Where candidates lose it
Pitching a household mega-cap with a thesis lifted from the financial press. If the reason is in the newspaper, it is in the price. Pick something slightly off the beaten path and know its numbers cold.
Expect next
- Are you sure that thesis can be backed up? What if their costs do not fall?
- What is the bear case?
- How would you hedge it?
Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, London, 2016); Morgan Stanley (Sales and Trading, Tokyo, 2025); Balyasny Asset Management (Generalist, New York, 2020). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
022Do you see yourself doing this for the rest of your career?Man GroupEquity Hedge · Boston · 2019Fidelity InvestmentsEquity Research · Toronto · 2026
Say this
Say yes, and make it credible by describing what specifically about the work would sustain you for twenty years. Research firms hire slowly and expect long tenure, so this question is a genuine screen, not a formality.
Then walk it
- Answer directly. Hedging here reads as someone passing through, and in a small investment team that is expensive.
- Then give the reason that survives the glamour wearing off: the work is the same at year one and year twenty, reading filings, building a view, being wrong sometimes, and compounding knowledge of an industry.
- Name the specific appeal: the feedback loop. Very few careers tell you clearly whether you were right. For people who want that scoreboard, nothing else substitutes.
- Acknowledge the hard parts honestly. Being wrong publicly, long periods where the thesis does not work, and the fact that the market can stay against you longer than you expect. Saying this shows you are not romanticising it.
- Connect it to the firm's horizon. If they run long-duration strategies, say that you want to build ten years of knowledge in a sector rather than rotate every two.
Where candidates lose it
An ambitious answer about starting your own fund. In an asset management interview that signals you will leave. Also, do not describe it as your 'passion' without evidence; describe the daily work and why it suits you.
Expect next
- What would make you leave?
- Where do you want to be in ten years?
- What is the hardest part of this job?
Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, Boston, 2019); Fidelity Investments (Equity Research, Toronto, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
025How large is the hedge fund industry?Man GroupEquity Hedge · London · 2016
Say this
Roughly $4 to $5 trillion in assets under management globally, across something like 10,000 funds. If you do not know the figure, build it: the largest firms run $50 to $100 billion each, and the top twenty or so account for a large share of the total.
Then walk it
- The headline number is around $4 to $5 trillion, which is worth knowing if you are interviewing at a hedge fund.
- If you are unsure, derive it. The biggest multi-managers run on the order of $60 to $100 billion. Twenty firms at an average of $50 billion is a trillion, and the long tail of thousands of smaller funds adds several more.
- For context, that is small relative to global equity market capitalisation of well over $100 trillion, and small relative to the roughly $12 trillion BlackRock alone manages. Hedge funds punch above their weight because of leverage and turnover, not size.
- The structural point worth adding: assets have concentrated heavily into a handful of large multi-manager platforms over the past decade, while the number of small funds has fallen. That concentration is the defining industry trend.
- And the fee model has moved with it: pass-through expenses at the big platforms rather than the traditional two and twenty.
Where candidates lose it
Guessing wildly with no derivation, or quoting a number you cannot contextualise. Being asked this at a hedge fund is a test of whether you know the industry you are applying to. Know the figure and one structural trend.
Expect next
- How has that changed in the last decade?
- What is a multi-manager platform?
- Why do you want to work at a hedge fund rather than long only?
Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, London, 2016). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.

