Equity Research interview preparation
Sell side and buy side. Every question is either traced to a named firm from a public candidate report, or tagged at desk level when we could not trace it. Answers lead with the point, then the mechanism, then the limitation.
100 questions, mapped to the firms that asked them
- Questions
- 100
- Traced to a firm
- 72
- Firms
- 45
- Updated
- September 2026
004Pitch me a stock.Man GroupEquity Hedge · London · 2016Morgan StanleySales and Trading · Tokyo · 2025Balyasny Asset ManagementGeneralist · New York · 2020
Say this
Recommendation and target first, business in two sentences, then the variant view, the catalyst, the risk, and what would make you wrong. Ninety seconds, and the variant view is the only part that counts.
Then walk it
- Open with the trade: 'Long X at 40, target 55, about 35 percent upside over 12 to 18 months.' Never build up to the recommendation.
- Two sentences on what the business actually does, so the interviewer knows you are not pitching a ticker.
- The variant view: what do you believe that consensus does not, and why are you right? 'The street models 8 percent growth; I think it is 14 because the new contract has not been added to numbers yet.' Quantify the gap.
- The catalyst and timing: what makes the market agree with you, and roughly when. A view with no catalyst is a value trap.
- Valuation: what multiple you are paying, what the peers trade at, what the reverse DCF implies.
- Risks and the falsifier: the two things that break the thesis, and the specific data point you would watch. Ending on what would make you wrong is what makes an analyst sound honest rather than promotional.
Where candidates lose it
Pitching a household mega-cap with a thesis lifted from the financial press. If the reason is in the newspaper, it is in the price. Pick something slightly off the beaten path and know its numbers cold.
Expect next
- Are you sure that thesis can be backed up? What if their costs do not fall?
- What is the bear case?
- How would you hedge it?
Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, London, 2016); Morgan Stanley (Sales and Trading, Tokyo, 2025); Balyasny Asset Management (Generalist, New York, 2020). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
017How would you value a bank?Perella Weinberg PartnersFinancial Institutions Group · New York · 2026Man GroupEquity Hedge · Boston · 2019
Say this
Price to tangible book against return on tangible equity, plus a dividend discount or residual income model. You do not use enterprise value or EBITDA, because for a bank debt is raw material and interest is revenue.
Then walk it
- The core relationship: a bank should trade around book value if its return on equity equals its cost of equity, above book if it earns more, below if it earns less. The regression of price to book against ROTE across a peer group is the single most useful chart in the sector.
- Use tangible book, stripping goodwill and intangibles, because that is the capital actually supporting the balance sheet.
- For an intrinsic value, use a dividend discount model or residual income, since dividends are constrained by regulatory capital and that constraint is the real driver of distributable cash.
- The forecast drivers are net interest margin, loan growth, fee income, the cost-to-income ratio, and the provision charge. Provisions are where the cycle shows up and where forecasts go wrong.
- Capital is the binding constraint on everything. CET1 ratio against the regulatory requirement determines whether the bank can grow, buy back stock or must raise equity, so I would model capital explicitly rather than treating it as an output.
- And the thing that actually breaks bank valuations: credit losses are non-linear. A small deterioration in the macro can wipe out several years of earnings, which is why banks trade below book in a downturn regardless of reported profit.
Where candidates lose it
Applying EV/EBITDA or a standard unlevered DCF. It is meaningless for a bank and it is an instant fail in a financials interview. Lead with price to tangible book versus ROTE and the reason enterprise value does not apply.
Expect next
- Why can you not use enterprise value?
- What happens to the valuation if rates fall 200 basis points?
- How do you forecast provisions?
Reported by candidates at Perella Weinberg Partners (Financial Institutions Group, New York, 2026); Man Group (Equity Hedge, Boston, 2019). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
021What is the difference between the sell side and the buy side, and why do you want this one?Man GroupEquity Hedge · Boston · 2019T. Rowe PriceEquity Research · New York · 2026
Say this
The sell side publishes research to clients and is paid for the service, so breadth, access and communication matter. The buy side makes decisions with capital at risk, so depth and being right matter. Pick the one whose scoreboard you actually want.
Then walk it
- Sell side: publish notes, maintain models across 10 to 20 names, host management meetings and conferences, talk to clients constantly. You are measured on the quality and usefulness of the service and, increasingly, on client votes.
- Buy side: fewer names, far deeper, and the output is a recommendation to a portfolio manager rather than a published note. You are measured on whether the calls made money.
- The cultural difference: the sell side rewards visibility and responsiveness; the buy side rewards judgement and conviction, and tolerates being quiet.
- Say which you want and why, honestly. 'I want the accountability of a position, so I want the buy side' is a good answer. So is 'I want breadth and access early in my career, which is why I want to start sell side'.
- If you are interviewing on the sell side, do not describe it as a stepping stone to the buy side, even though many people treat it that way. They know, and saying it is careless.
Where candidates lose it
Describing the sell side as merely a training ground. It is a career in itself and the person interviewing you has chosen it. Be specific about what attracts you to the seat you are actually sitting in.
Expect next
- Do you see yourself doing this for the rest of your career?
- Why this firm rather than a bank?
- How is sell-side research paid for now?
Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, Boston, 2019); T. Rowe Price (Equity Research, New York, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
022Do you see yourself doing this for the rest of your career?Man GroupEquity Hedge · Boston · 2019Fidelity InvestmentsEquity Research · Toronto · 2026
Say this
Say yes, and make it credible by describing what specifically about the work would sustain you for twenty years. Research firms hire slowly and expect long tenure, so this question is a genuine screen, not a formality.
Then walk it
- Answer directly. Hedging here reads as someone passing through, and in a small investment team that is expensive.
- Then give the reason that survives the glamour wearing off: the work is the same at year one and year twenty, reading filings, building a view, being wrong sometimes, and compounding knowledge of an industry.
- Name the specific appeal: the feedback loop. Very few careers tell you clearly whether you were right. For people who want that scoreboard, nothing else substitutes.
- Acknowledge the hard parts honestly. Being wrong publicly, long periods where the thesis does not work, and the fact that the market can stay against you longer than you expect. Saying this shows you are not romanticising it.
- Connect it to the firm's horizon. If they run long-duration strategies, say that you want to build ten years of knowledge in a sector rather than rotate every two.
Where candidates lose it
An ambitious answer about starting your own fund. In an asset management interview that signals you will leave. Also, do not describe it as your 'passion' without evidence; describe the daily work and why it suits you.
Expect next
- What would make you leave?
- Where do you want to be in ten years?
- What is the hardest part of this job?
Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, Boston, 2019); Fidelity Investments (Equity Research, Toronto, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
025How large is the hedge fund industry?Man GroupEquity Hedge · London · 2016
Say this
Roughly $4 to $5 trillion in assets under management globally, across something like 10,000 funds. If you do not know the figure, build it: the largest firms run $50 to $100 billion each, and the top twenty or so account for a large share of the total.
Then walk it
- The headline number is around $4 to $5 trillion, which is worth knowing if you are interviewing at a hedge fund.
- If you are unsure, derive it. The biggest multi-managers run on the order of $60 to $100 billion. Twenty firms at an average of $50 billion is a trillion, and the long tail of thousands of smaller funds adds several more.
- For context, that is small relative to global equity market capitalisation of well over $100 trillion, and small relative to the roughly $12 trillion BlackRock alone manages. Hedge funds punch above their weight because of leverage and turnover, not size.
- The structural point worth adding: assets have concentrated heavily into a handful of large multi-manager platforms over the past decade, while the number of small funds has fallen. That concentration is the defining industry trend.
- And the fee model has moved with it: pass-through expenses at the big platforms rather than the traditional two and twenty.
Where candidates lose it
Guessing wildly with no derivation, or quoting a number you cannot contextualise. Being asked this at a hedge fund is a test of whether you know the industry you are applying to. Know the figure and one structural trend.
Expect next
- How has that changed in the last decade?
- What is a multi-manager platform?
- Why do you want to work at a hedge fund rather than long only?
Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, London, 2016). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
026What makes up a fund's net asset value?Man GroupEquity Hedge · Boston · 2019
Say this
The market value of everything the fund owns, less everything it owes, divided by units outstanding. Assets are the positions plus cash and receivables; liabilities are shorts, borrowings, accrued fees and payables.
Then walk it
- Assets: the mark-to-market value of long positions, cash, margin held at the prime broker, dividends and interest receivable, and unrealised gains on derivatives.
- Liabilities: short positions valued at market, leverage and margin borrowings, accrued management and performance fees, redemptions payable, and unrealised losses on derivatives.
- Divide the net figure by units outstanding to get NAV per unit. That per-unit figure is what investors subscribe and redeem at.
- The judgement sits in valuation. Liquid listed equities are straightforward. Illiquid or level three assets are marked to model, and that is where NAV becomes an estimate rather than a fact.
- Which is why the practical questions matter: who strikes the NAV, how often, and is there an independent administrator? A manager marking its own illiquid book is a governance concern, and saying so shows you understand why the question is asked.
Where candidates lose it
Giving the formula and stopping. The interesting content is valuation of illiquid positions and the role of the independent administrator. That is what an operations-aware investor actually cares about.
Expect next
- How do you value a level three asset?
- Who strikes the NAV?
- What is a side pocket?
Reported by candidates at Man Group (Equity Hedge, Boston, 2019). Source: Wall Street Oasis.
Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.

