Case 046Financing, capital structure and treasuryCore
Sindhuja Electronics owes US $20 million in six months. Compare leaving it open, a forward and a call option if the rupee ends at 80, 84 or 88, and say what each choice is really a decision about.
1The situation
Sindhuja Electronics imports display panels and must pay a supplier US $20 million in six months. Its bank quotes, for illustration: spot Rs 83.0 per dollar, a six-month forward at Rs 84.2, and a six-month call option on the dollar with a Rs 84 strike for a premium of Rs 1.0 per dollar, paid today. All rates are assumed for this exercise; confirm live quotes before any real decision.
The CFO wants a one-page comparison of three choices: do nothing, buy the forward, or buy the option, under three endings for the rupee: Rs 80, 84 and 88.
2Your task
Compute the rupee cost of the payment under each choice and each ending, find the breakeven rates between the choices, and recommend a policy rather than a bet.
Quick check
If the rupee strengthens to 80, which choice costs the least?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
The forward fixes the cost at Rs 168.4 crore; the option caps it at Rs 170 crore for a Rs 2 crore premium; no hedge ranges from Rs 160 to Rs 176 crore. At 80 the open position wins and the forward loses; at 88 the forward wins and the open position pays Rs 7.6 crore more. The option beats the forward only below Rs 83.2 and beats no hedge only above Rs 85. An importer on a thin margin should treat the choice as policy, not a view on the rupee.
Step 1What is each choice actually buying?
Think of a family that has agreed to buy a flat in six months. It can wait and pay whatever the price is then, fix the price today with the seller, or pay a non-refundable fee for the right to buy at a fixed price if it still wants to. No hedge is a bet on the rupee; a forwardA binding agreement to exchange a set amount of one currency for another at a fixed rate on a future date. swaps the bet for certainty; an optionThe right, not the obligation, to buy the currency at a fixed strike by a date, bought for a premium paid up front. buys insurance against the bad ending and keeps the good one, at a price. The forward rate of 84.2 is above spot not because the bank expects the rupee to weaken but because rupee interest rates are higher than dollar rates; that gap is the cost of carry, not a forecast.
Step 2What does the payment cost in each ending?
| Rupee at settlement | No hedge | Forward at 84.2 | Call at 84, premium 1.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rs 80 | 160.0 | 168.4 | 162.0 |
| Rs 84 | 168.0 | 168.4 | 170.0 |
| Rs 88 | 176.0 | 168.4 | 170.0 |
| Range | 16 | 0 | 8 |
Unhedged, every rupee of movement is Rs 2 crore; the forward removes all of it; the option removes the upside beyond 84 and leaves the downside, less the Rs 2 crore premium. At 84 the option is the worst of the three, Rs 170 crore against Rs 168.4 crore and Rs 168 crore, because the insurance was bought and not needed. That is not a mistake; it is what insurance costs in the year the house does not burn.
Step 3Where are the breakevens, and what policy follows?
Two rates decide it. The option beats the forward only if the rupee ends below Rs 83.2, where spot plus the premium is less than 84.2; and it beats no hedge only above Rs 85, where the cap starts to pay. Between 83.2 and 85 the option is the dearest choice. So the option is for a company that genuinely expects a large move either way and cannot say which. For an importer that prices its panels in rupees on a thin margin, the honest answer is that it is not in the currency business: a rupee of depreciation is Rs 2 crore off profit it did not plan to risk.
The policy, then, is not a view on 80 or 88. It is a rule: hedge a set share of confirmed payables, say 70 to 100%, with forwards as soon as the order is firm, and use options only where the payable itself is uncertain, for example a tender not yet won, so that a forward could leave the company holding dollars it does not need. Say the limit too: the forward's Rs 8.4 crore of regret at 80 is real, and a board that will punish the treasurer for it in a strong-rupee year is a board that has not agreed the policy.
Where candidates lose it
The common loss is picking the forward because 84.2 is above 83 and calling that a gain. The forward premium is interest differential, not a forecast, and the forward loses money against spot whenever the rupee ends below 84.2.
The second is forgetting the option premium in the comparison. At 84 the option costs Rs 170 crore, not Rs 168 crore, and that Rs 2 crore is paid whether or not the option is used.
What the interviewer asks next
- The supplier offers a 1.5% discount for paying in three months instead of six. How does that change the hedge?
- How would you hedge if the order is only 60% likely to be confirmed?
- Rupee interest rates fall by one point. What happens to the forward rate, and does that make hedging cheaper?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
