Case 085Investment evaluation and pitchesHard
You are long a defence electronics stock that has no close listed peer. Given its betas, R-squared and residual volatility, how would you hedge it, how large is the hedge, and what risk is left?
1The situation
Your fund is long Rs 50 crore of Kavachdhar Defence Electronics, an invented maker of radar and communication systems for the armed forces. No listed company does quite the same thing. The thesis is specific: a large naval order you expect to be awarded within a year.
Against a capital goods and defence sector index, Kavachdhar's beta is 1.2 with an R-squared of 0.35. Against the broad market its beta is 0.9. Its residual volatility, the part the sector index does not explain, is 28% a year. Liquid futures exist on both indices. The portfolio manager wants the position to express the order thesis, not a bet on the sector.
2Your task
What would you hedge with, how large is the hedge, how much risk does it remove, and what is still yours?
Quick check
With an R-squared of 0.35, how much of Kavachdhar's rupee risk does a perfect sector hedge remove?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Short about Rs 60 crore of sector index futures, 1.2 times the position, and accept that most of the risk stays. The hedge cancels the sector move, but with an R-squared of 0.35 it removes only 35% of the variance, cutting yearly risk from about Rs 17.4 crore to Rs 14.0 crore. What remains is Kavachdhar's own risk, which is the order thesis itself. Size the position for that residual, because no index can hedge it.
Step 1What can a hedge actually remove?
Think of a shopkeeper in a hill town who worries about tourist season. He can insure against a bad season for the whole town, but no policy covers his own shop losing customers to a new rival next door. A hedge removes the shared factor, the part of the stock's move that comes from its sector, and leaves the part that belongs to the company alone. Kavachdhar's sector explains 35% of its variance. The other 65% is order wins, delays, audits and management, which is exactly what the thesis is about and exactly what no index will offset.
Step 2Which index and how much?
Use the sector index, because it carries more of Kavachdhar's move than the market and already includes the market's influence. Hedging both would double count. The hedge ratio is the beta: Rs 50 crore times 1.2 is Rs 60 crore of sector futures sold. If the sector falls 10%, Kavachdhar's expected factor move is minus Rs 6 crore and the short futures gain Rs 6 crore, so the shared move nets to zero. A market hedge would be Rs 45 crore at a beta of 0.9, but it would leave the sector-specific swings of defence stocks in the position.
Step 3How much risk is left in rupees?
Rebuild the total from the pieces. If the residual is 28% and it is 65% of the variance, total volatility is 28% divided by the square root of 0.65, about 34.7%. Unhedged, the position carries about Rs 17.4 crore of one-standard-deviation risk a year; hedged, about Rs 14.0 crore, a cut of only 19%. Daily, the hedged risk is about Rs 0.88 crore. The hedge is worth doing, because it strips out a risk you are not paid for, but it does not make the position small.
| 0.28 | residual volatility, the part the sector does not explain |
| 0.35 | R-squared, the share of variance the sector explains |
| sigma | Kavachdhar's total volatility before hedging |
| 50 | position size, Rs crore |
Step 4What can go wrong with the hedge itself?
Three things. A beta estimated with an R-squared of 0.35 is itself uncertain, so the true hedge ratio could plausibly sit anywhere from about 0.9 to 1.5. Re-estimate it over different windows and see how stable it is. Second, a single large index constituent can move the sector for reasons unrelated to Kavachdhar, adding noise to the hedge. Third, futures need rolling and margin, which costs money and cash. A custom basket of three or four companies exposed to the same defence budget might track better than the index; test that on history before using it.
Close with sizing, because that is where the residual risk is managed. If the fund can tolerate about Rs 10 crore of one-standard-deviation loss a year on this idea, the hedged position should be no larger than about Rs 36 crore, not Rs 50 crore. When a name cannot be hedged, the position size is the hedge.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates assume a hedged position is a safe position. They size the short, say the stock is now hedged, and stop. With an R-squared of 0.35, most of the risk is still there; the interviewer wants to hear that the residual is the thesis and that size controls it.
The other loss is reading R-squared as the share of risk removed. It is a share of variance; in rupee terms a 0.35 R-squared removes about a fifth of the risk, not a third.
What the interviewer asks next
- The stock has listed options. How would you use them instead of an index hedge?
- How would you test whether a custom basket hedges better than the sector index?
- The naval order is announced and the stock jumps 20%. What happens to your hedge ratio?
- Would you rather hold Rs 50 crore hedged or Rs 35 crore unhedged, and why?
Asked at Balyasny Asset Management, Equity Research, New York, 2026 (Wall Street Oasis): How would you hedge this name that doesn't have a very similar public comp?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
