Case 029Fund economics, NAV and LP decisionsCore
Build the month-end NAV for Ovelle Partners from gross assets of Rs 1,050 crore, a prime broker loan, accrued fees and redemptions payable, with 9.9 crore units in issue. What is the NAV per unit?
1The situation
Ovelle Partners is a long-short equity fund closing its books for the month. Its long positions at market, cash at the prime broker and dividends receivable, less the market value of its short positions, come to gross assets of Rs 1,050 crore.
Against that it owes a loan from its prime broker of Rs 40 crore, the month's accrued management fee of Rs 1.5 crore, a performance fee of Rs 6 crore accrued on this year's gains, and Rs 12.5 crore to investors who redeemed at this month end and are waiting to be paid. After cancelling the redeemed units, 9.9 crore units remain in issue.
2Your task
What are net assets and the NAV per unit, which line do people most often miss, and what goes wrong if it is missed?
Quick check
If the performance fee accrual is left out, what NAV per unit does Ovelle publish?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Net assets are Rs 990 crore and the NAV is Rs 100.00 a unit. Start from gross assets of Rs 1,050 crore and subtract everything owed: the Rs 40 crore prime broker loan, Rs 1.5 crore of management fee, Rs 6 crore of accrued performance fee and Rs 12.5 crore of redemptions payable. The performance fee accrual is the line people miss; leaving it out overstates NAV by about 0.6% and overpays anyone who redeems.
Step 1What goes into a NAV?
A NAV works like a household's net worth on one date: everything it owns at today's price, less everything it owes, including bills that have arrived but not yet been paid. Net asset value is assets at market less every liability that exists on the valuation date, whether or not the cash has left yet. For a hedge fund the assets are long positions, cash and receivables; the liabilities are borrowing from the prime brokerThe bank that lends a hedge fund cash and stock, holds its positions and settles its trades., short positions at market, accrued fees and money owed to leaving investors. Divide by the units in issue and you have the price at which investors come in and go out.
| Line | Rs crore | Why it is there |
|---|---|---|
| Gross assets | 1,050.0 | Longs at market, cash, receivables, less shorts at market |
| Prime broker loan | (40.0) | Borrowed to fund part of the long book |
| Management fee accrued | (1.5) | This month's fee, earned but not yet paid |
| Performance fee accrued | (6.0) | Share of this year's gains above the high-water mark |
| Redemptions payable | (12.5) | Owed to investors who left at this month end |
| Net assets | 990.0 | |
| Units in issue, crore | 9.9 | After cancelling redeemed units |
| NAV per unit, Rs | 100.00 |
Step 2Why is the performance fee accrual the line people miss?
The fee is paid once a year, so on most month ends no cash has moved. But the fee has already been earned on gains that sit inside the NAV. If the accrual is left out, NAV is overstated, and every investor who redeems that month is paid partly with money that belongs to the manager. The investors who stay then bear the whole fee when it is finally paid. At Ovelle the error is Rs 6 crore: NAV would read Rs 100.61 instead of Rs 100.00, and an investor redeeming Rs 50 crore of units would be overpaid by about Rs 30 lakh.
The accrual also passes a sense check. At a 20% fee, Rs 6 crore implies the fund has made about Rs 30 crore this year above its high-water markThe highest NAV on which a performance fee has already been paid; no new performance fee is due until the fund climbs back above it., around 3% on a fund of this size. If the fund is below its high-water mark, the performance fee accrual should be zero, and a non-zero number is a question for the administrator. The management fee checks the same way: Rs 1.5 crore a month on roughly Rs 1,000 crore is about 1.8% a year, which should match the fee in the offering documents.
Step 3What else can make a NAV wrong?
Two things, both on the asset side or in the unit count. Prices: a fund holding thinly traded stocks or unlisted positions has to choose a price, and that choice moves NAV. The administrator, not the portfolio manager, should strike the NAV from independent prices, which is why allocators always ask who values the hard-to-price positions. Timing: redemptions payable must match the units already cancelled. Remove the Rs 12.5 crore liability without cancelling the 0.125 crore units it pays for, or the other way round, and the per-unit number is wrong even when the total is right.
Where candidates lose it
The miss the interviewer is listening for is leaving out the performance fee because it has not been paid yet. Accrual accounting says a liability exists once it is earned; a NAV that waits for the cash overpays the people who leave and quietly charges the people who stay.
The second is treating the prime broker loan as an asset because it arrived as cash. The cash is already inside the Rs 1,050 crore of assets; the loan is what the fund owes for it, and it comes off.
What the interviewer asks next
- The fund is 4% below its high-water mark. What is the performance fee accrual?
- An investor subscribes Rs 20 crore at this NAV. How many units does she receive?
- What is equalisation, and what problem does it solve?
- Who strikes the NAV, and why should it not be the portfolio manager?
Asked at Man Group, Equity Hedge, Boston, 2019 (Wall Street Oasis): What makes up a NAV? Tell us about yourself? Why do you want to work at a hedge fund?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
