Case 063Volatility, options and convertiblesCore
Ferrin Vol Fund sells one-month at-the-money index straddles every month at 16% implied volatility, while realised volatility averages 12%. Roughly what does it earn in a normal month, and what happens in a month when the index moves 12%?
1The situation
Ferrin Vol Fund's core strategy is simple. On the first day of each month it sells a one-month at-the-money straddle, a call and a put at today's level, on a broad equity index, on notional equal to its capital. It holds to expiry without hedging.
The straddles are priced at 16% implied volatility. Over the fund's history, the index's realised volatility has averaged 12% a year. Ignore interest and transaction costs.
2Your task
What premium does Ferrin collect, what does it earn on average and in a typical month, and what does a 12% index move in one month do to it?
Quick check
Roughly what premium does a one-month at-the-money straddle at 16% volatility bring in, per 100 of notional?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Ferrin collects about 3.69% of notional a month and pays out about 2.76% on average, so it earns about 0.92% in an average month and about 1.3% in a typical one. A month in which the index moves 12% costs about 8.3%, roughly 9 average months of gains. The volatility premium pays steadily until one large move takes back most of a year.
Step 1What does Ferrin collect, and what does it expect to pay?
Price the straddle with the shortcut every desk uses. An at-the-money straddle is worth about 0.8 times volatility times the square root of time: 0.8 x 16% x 0.289, about 3.69% of notional. At expiry Ferrin pays out the size of the index's move, in either direction. If the index really moves with 12% volatility, the average absolute move in a month is about 0.8 x 12% x 0.289, 2.76%. The difference, about 0.92% a month, is the volatility risk premiumThe tendency of option prices to imply more volatility than later turns up, which is the pay option sellers receive for taking on crash risk., worth about 11% a year on notional equal to capital.
| sqrt(2/pi) | about 0.8: the average absolute size of a standard normal move |
| sigma | the implied volatility, 16% a year |
| T | time to expiry, one twelfth of a year |
Step 2What does a normal month look like?
Mostly quiet gains. It works like selling flood insurance in a town where it rarely floods: most years every premium is profit. With monthly index volatility of about 3.5%, about 71% of months move less than the premium collected, and the median month earns about 1.3%. That is why the strategy's track record looks smooth: many small gains, few losses, and a Sharpe ratio that looks excellent for years. The shape is the whole story. The gain is capped at the 3.69% premium; the loss is not capped at all.
Step 3What happens when the index moves 12% in a month?
Ferrin owes the whole move and keeps only its premium. 12% less 3.69% is a loss of about 8.3% of capital, which erases about 9 months of average profit in one month. A normal model says such a month, more than three and a half standard deviations, comes about once in 157 years. Equity indices have produced moves of that size in several crises within living memory, far more often than the bell curve allows, which is the whole reason the premium exists. Sold on twice the notional, the same month costs 17%.
| Per 100 of notional, one month | Value |
|---|---|
| Premium collected | 3.69 |
| Expected payout at 12% realised | 2.76 |
| Average month | +0.92 |
| Median month | +1.35 |
| Share of months that gain | 71% |
| Month with a 12% index move | -8.31 |
Close with what a risk manager would do about it. Size the notional so the worst plausible month is survivable, not so the average month looks attractive. Buy some protection further out, such as cheap out-of-the-money puts, which gives up part of the premium to cap the tail. And judge the strategy on its worst months, not its Sharpe ratio, which flatters any strategy whose losses have not happened yet.
Where candidates lose it
The common error is quoting the 4-point gap in volatility as the monthly profit, as if the fund earned 4% a month. The gap has to be converted into option prices: it is worth under one point a month of notional.
The second is calling the strategy low risk because its volatility has been low. Its history has few bad months by construction; the risk sits in the month that has not happened yet.
What the interviewer asks next
- If Ferrin delta-hedged the straddles daily, what would its P&L depend on instead?
- How much would a 10% out-of-the-money put cost, roughly, and how would it change the worst month?
- Implied volatility jumps to 30% after a crash. Should Ferrin sell more or less, and why?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
