Case 004RestructuringHard
A holding company has notes outstanding and owns three operating subsidiaries, each with its own debt. In a liquidation, what do the holding company noteholders recover?
1The situation
Meridian Holdings has Rs 300 crore of notes at the holding company and no guarantees from its subsidiaries. It owns 100% of three operating companies. OpCo A is worth Rs 400 crore in liquidation and owes Rs 250 crore. OpCo B is worth Rs 150 crore and owes Rs 200 crore. OpCo C is worth Rs 100 crore and owes Rs 20 crore.
2Your task
What does each set of lenders recover, and what changes if the holding company had guaranteed OpCo B's debt?
Quick check
Do OpCo B's losses reduce what reaches the holding company from A and C?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
The holding company noteholders recover about 76.7%. Each subsidiary pays its own lenders first. OpCo A passes Rs 150 crore up, OpCo C passes Rs 80 crore, and OpCo B passes nothing, its lenders taking a 75% recovery. That is Rs 230 crore against Rs 300 crore of notes. A guarantee of OpCo B's debt would cut the notes to about 65.7%.
Step 1Why do the holding company lenders stand behind everyone else?
A holding company owns shares, not factories. Its lenders can only be paid from what is left after every subsidiary's own creditors are paid in full, which is structural subordinationLenders to a parent company rank behind the creditors of its subsidiaries, because the parent only owns equity in them.. It works like a family where each sibling runs a separate shop: a lender to the parent gets only what each shop has left after its own suppliers are settled.
Step 2Why is netting the group together the wrong answer?
Netting says the group is worth Rs 650 crore, owes Rs 470 crore at the subsidiaries, and leaves Rs 180 crore, 60% for the notes. That treats OpCo B's Rs 50 crore shortfall as if it reduced A's and C's surplus, which limited liability does not allow. The shortfall stays at OpCo B as a loss for OpCo B's lenders, so the notes do better than the consolidated figures suggest.
Step 3What does a guarantee change?
If Meridian had guaranteed OpCo B's debt, OpCo B's lenders would claim their Rs 50 crore shortfall at the holding company alongside the notes. Rs 230 crore is then shared across Rs 350 crore of claims, about 65.7% each, so the notes lose value and OpCo B's lenders move up to about 91% overall. This is why the first question on any capital structure is who guarantees whom.
Where candidates lose it
Most candidates consolidate: add up all the value, subtract all the subsidiary debt, and hand the rest to the holding company. That gives 60% and shows the interviewer you do not understand why structural subordination exists.
The second miss is forgetting that the answer depends entirely on guarantees. Ask about them before you calculate.
What the interviewer asks next
- OpCo A also has Rs 50 crore of trade creditors. Does that change the notes' recovery?
- How could the holding company move value out of reach of OpCo lenders before a filing, and why do lenders fight it?
- Where would you rather lend: the holding company notes with a 12% coupon or OpCo A debt at 9%?
Asked at Evercore, Restructuring, New York, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): Holding company has $x of debt at their level. their 3 companies have {#} debt and {#} ev. what are recovery %'s in liquidation
Asked at Houlihan Lokey, Restructuring, New York, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): Series of questions on structural subordination scenarios
Company names and figures are illustrative.
