Case 088Comps and relative valueCore
Stock pitch: an auto parts maker trades at 14x earnings against peers at 20x, and management guides electric vehicle parts from 10% to 25% of revenue by FY28 at higher margins. Build a variant view, the catalysts and the risks, and say what the market is missing, if anything.
1The situation
Dhruvak Auto Components, an invented listed parts maker, trades at Rs 280, 14x earnings per share of Rs 20, with 10 crore shares. Listed peers trade at about 20x. Revenue is Rs 2,000 crore. Parts for electric vehicles are 10% of revenue and earn a net margin of 14.5%, against 9.5% on engine and transmission parts.
Management guides electric vehicle parts to 25% of revenue by FY28, three years out, and total revenue growth of about 8% a year. The interviewer says: you mentioned an investment club on your CV, so pitch me this one.
2Your task
Give a variant view backed by numbers, the catalysts that would close the gap, the risks to each step, and what the market may be right about.
Quick check
If the guidance is met, roughly what does FY28 EPS come to?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
The variant view is that the market prices Dhruvak as an engine parts supplier in decline, while the mix shift lifts EPS about 11% a year to around Rs 27.1 by FY28. At today's 14x that alone implies about Rs 379; a partial re-rating towards peers adds more. The market may be right if EV margins converge with engine parts, which would cut FY28 EPS to about Rs 23.9.
Step 1What makes a pitch more than a cheap multiple?
A variant viewA specific belief about a company that differs from what the market price implies, with evidence for why you are right and the market is wrong.: a reason the market is wrong and a way to check it. A stock at 14x against peers at 20x is cheap only if the earnings and risks are the same; if they are not, the discount may be fair. A second-hand car priced below the others on the lot is a bargain only if you know why the dealer marked it down. Here the market seems to price Dhruvak on its engine parts, which face a long decline as cars electrify. The variant view is that the electric vehicle business changes both the growth and the margin.
Step 2What do the numbers say if guidance is met?
Rebuild today's profit first, to check the inputs: Rs 1,800 crore at 9.5% plus Rs 200 crore at 14.5% is Rs 200 crore, EPS of Rs 20. By FY28, Rs 2,519 crore of revenue with a quarter from EV parts gives about Rs 271 crore of profit and EPS of Rs 27.1, 10.6% a year. Note what the mix does: engine parts revenue barely grows, about 1.6% a year, so the EV business carries almost all of the growth and pulls the margin up from 10.0% to 10.8%.
| FY28 case | EV share | EV net margin | EPS, Rs | At 14x, Rs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guidance met | 25% | 14.5% | 27.1 | 379 |
| EV share stalls | 15% | 14.5% | 25.8 | 362 |
| EV margins converge | 25% | 9.5% | 23.9 | 335 |
Step 3What are the catalysts, and what might the market be right about?
Two catalysts can close the gap. Quarterly disclosure of the EV share of revenue with its margin, which turns guidance into evidence, and a new contract with a large electric vehicle maker, which tells the market the customer base is shifting. The market may be right about margins: early EV contracts are often won on price, and if EV parts end up earning what engine parts do, most of the re-rating argument goes. It may also be right that peers deserve 20x because they earn higher returns on capital or have less customer concentration, in which case Dhruvak closes only part of the gap. A fair close is a move to about 17x, not 20x, which implies about Rs 460 if the guidance is met.
State the downside plainly, because interviewers test whether you know it. If EV margins converge and the multiple falls to 12x, Dhruvak is worth about Rs 287, against Rs 280 today. The pitch is a view that the mix shift is real, not that the stock is cheap. The number that would end it is the EV margin in the first two quarterly disclosures.
Where candidates lose it
The common miss is pitching on the multiple gap alone: peers are at 20x, Dhruvak at 14x, so it should re-rate. Without a reason the discount exists and a reason it will close, the interviewer will ask why the market has not already noticed.
The second is presenting guidance as fact. Management guides; you underwrite. Showing what EPS looks like if the EV share stalls or margins converge is what turns a story into a pitch.
What the interviewer asks next
- Why might Dhruvak deserve a lower multiple than peers even if the EV shift happens?
- How would you hedge the pitch against a fall in auto sector multiples?
- Which customer disclosure would change your view the most?
- What would make you change the pitch to a sell?
Asked at Wells Fargo Securities, Generalist, Charlotte, 2025 (Wall Street Oasis): Dived in depth on LBOs, Levered vs unlevered dcf, unexpected stock pitch (due to investment club on resume)
Company names and figures are illustrative.
