Case 006Equity research and stock pitchesWarm up
A quick-service restaurant chain spends Rs 2.5 crore to open a store that earns Rs 4 crore of revenue at an 18% store-level margin. What is the payback, and how many stores a year can Rs 150 crore of operating cash flow fund?
1The situation
Rasoiyana Foods runs 400 quick-service restaurants serving regional thalis and rolls. A new store costs Rs 2.5 crore to open, covering fit-out, kitchen equipment and deposits. A mature store earns Rs 4 crore of revenue a year at an 18% store-level EBITDA margin, after rent, staff and food costs but before head office.
The company generated Rs 150 crore of operating cash flow last year after head office costs, interest and tax. Management says it can grow without raising new equity or debt. You are covering the stock for your fund's consumer analyst.
2Your task
What is the payback on one store, how many new stores a year can the cash flow fund, and what does that say about how fast the chain can grow on its own money?
Quick check
Roughly how long does a mature Rasoiyana store take to earn back its Rs 2.5 crore?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
A mature store pays back in about 3.5 years, and Rs 150 crore of cash flow funds about 60 new stores a year. Each store earns Rs 0.72 crore a year on Rs 2.5 crore invested, a pre-tax store return of about 29%. Sixty stores on a base of 400 is 15% unit growth a year, which is the pace the chain can sustain on its own cash.
Step 1What does one store actually return?
Picture a friend who spends Rs 2.5 lakh to set up a tea stall that brings in Rs 4 lakh a year in sales. What matters to her is not the Rs 4 lakh but what is left after tea leaves, milk, rent and a helper. Payback is measured on the cash a unit keeps, not the revenue it rings up. For Rasoiyana, 18% of Rs 4 crore is Rs 0.72 crore of store EBITDA a year. Rs 2.5 crore divided by Rs 0.72 crore is a payback of about 3.5 years, and the same numbers give a pre-tax return on the store of about 28.8% a year.
| 2.5 | cost to open one store, Rs crore |
| 4.0 | revenue of a mature store, Rs crore a year |
| 18% | store-level EBITDA margin |
Step 2How real is the 3.5 years?
The clean figure assumes a store is mature on opening day, and new restaurants rarely are. Assume the first year runs at 75% of mature revenue and a 12% margin while the neighbourhood discovers it. That first year earns Rs 0.36 crore instead of Rs 0.72 crore, and payback stretches to about 4.0 years. Two more caveats belong in the pitch. Store EBITDA is before tax and before head office, so the true cash payback for the company is longer still. And new stores near old ones can take customers from them, a problem called cannibalisationWhen a new store wins sales partly from the company’s own existing stores nearby, so the chain gains less than the new store reports., which store-level numbers hide.
Step 3How many stores can the company fund without new money?
Rs 150 crore of operating cash flow divided by Rs 2.5 crore a store is 60 stores a year. The more useful way to say it: each existing store generates about Rs 0.375 crore of company cash flow after head office, interest and tax. Divide that by the cost of a new store and you get the growth rate the chain can fund on its own, about 15% more stores every year. Because new stores add cash flow once they open, the number of stores the company can afford rises each year even though the percentage stays the same.
| Year | Stores at start | Cash flow, Rs crore | New stores funded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 400 | 150.0 | 60 |
| Year 2 | 460 | 172.5 | 69 |
| Year 3 | 529 | 198.4 | 79 |
| Year 4 | 608 | 228.0 | 91 |
| Year 5 | 699 | 262.1 | 104 |
Step 4What do you tell the analyst?
Store economics set the speed limit: about 15% unit growth a year is what Rasoiyana can fund itself, and anything faster needs new capital or better stores. If management guides to 25% store growth, ask where the gap is funded from, since it implies debt or dilution. The levers that raise the limit are cheaper fit-outs, faster ramp-up and higher store margins. The test for the pitch is whether new stores are earning what old ones did: if recent openings pay back in five years instead of three and a half, the chain is running out of good locations, and the growth rate the market pays for is at risk.
Where candidates lose it
The common loss is computing payback on revenue, Rs 2.5 crore over Rs 4 crore, and announcing a few months. The interviewer wants the margin applied first; revenue never pays anything back.
The second miss is stopping at 60 stores a year without turning it into a growth rate. Sixty stores means something only against the existing base, and the self-funded growth rate is what a pitch needs.
What the interviewer asks next
- Fit-out costs rise to Rs 3 crore a store. What happens to the self-funded growth rate?
- Management guides to 100 new stores next year. How would you check whether that needs new money?
- How would you test for cannibalisation from the company's disclosures?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
