Fin Maverick
Foundations VocabularyAccounting & ReportingEconomics & MacroQuant Methods & ProgrammingBusiness & Company AnalysisCorporate Finance & ValuationBehavioural Finance
Banking & Market InfrastructureFixed Income & RatesDerivatives & Structured ProductsPublic EquitiesTransactions & DealsPortfolio ConstructionFunds & AMCs
Private Markets & AlternativesRisk, Treasury & ControlAI & Digital FinanceStochastic Calculus & PricingWealth & Personal FinanceIndian Markets & RegulationProfessional Practice
CalculatorComparison
Frameworks
Explore Bootcamps
Equity ResearchPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund MasteryInvestment Banking Analyst
Private Equity AnalystQuant & Hedge Fund AnalystBreaking Into VCFinancial Analyst Program
Risk Management ProgramPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsDerivatives Foundation
Explore Free Courses

Equity Research6

Writing an Investment ThesisBuilding a Discounted Cash FlowReading an Annual Report FastReading a Sector Before a CompanySpotting Quality of Earnings Red FlagsBuilding a Revenue Forecast From Drivers

Portfolio Management3

Rebalancing: When, Why and What It CostsStrategic and Tactical Asset AllocationMeasuring Risk in a Portfolio

Mutual Fund Mastery3

Comparing Funds Without Being FooledHow a NAV Is Struck and Which Day You GetReading a Fund Factsheet Properly

Derivatives Unlocked4

Hedging a Real ExposureThe Greeks, PracticallyFutures, the Basis and What Moves ItReading an Option Payoff

AI For Finance2

Retrieval and Grounding for FinanceDocument Extraction in Finance

Breaking Into Quants4

Backtesting a StrategyHypothesis TestingCleaning Financial DataRegression for Finance

Breaking Into VC3

Sizing a MarketReading a Term Sheet as a FounderHow a Venture Round Actually Works

Financial Analyst Program4

Common Size and Trend AnalysisReading a Cash Flow StatementRatio Analysis That Says SomethingBuilding a Working Capital Schedule

Risk Management Program2

Credit Exposure and How It Is ReducedValue at Risk and What It Hides

Investment Banking Analyst3

Precedent Transactions and Why They DifferReading a Term Sheet StructurallyBuilding a Comparable Companies Table

Private Wealth Management3

Tax Aware Portfolio DecisionsBuilding a Client Risk ProfileGoal Based Planning Arithmetic

Debt Capital Markets3

Analysing an Issuer's CreditDuration and What It Does Not Tell YouBond Pricing and Yield Mechanics

Private Equity Analyst2

Fund Waterfalls and CarryThe LBO in Structure

Hedge Funds Analyst2

Short Selling MechanicsLong Short Mechanics
QuarksCourses
Explore Interview Preparation
Investment BankingEquity ResearchVenture CapitalistPrivate EquityHedge Funds
QuantFinancial AnalysisPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsRisk Management
Derivatives FoundationPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund Mastery
PartnershipsShowdown
Log inSign up
Interview tracksAll
1Investment Banking
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
2Equity Research
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
3Venture Capital
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
4Private Equity
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
5Hedge Funds
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
6Quant
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
7Financial Analysis
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
8Private Wealth Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
9Debt Capital Markets
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
10Risk Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
11Derivatives Foundation
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
12Portfolio Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
13Mutual Fund Mastery
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
045

Case 045Duration and rates positioningHard

A dynamic bond fund expects rate cuts and must choose between a 10-year callable bond with modified duration 7.1 and effective duration 4.2, and a 7-year bullet with duration 5.6, at similar yields. Which gains more from a 100 basis point fall, and what allocation would you run today?

AmundiLondon · 2018

1The situation

Anantya Mutual Fund's dynamic bond fund expects the central bank to cut rates over the coming year. It is choosing between two bonds for new money. The first is a 10-year bond issued by a lender, callable at par by the issuer after three years, yielding 7.40%. Its modified duration, calculated to maturity, is 7.1, but its effective duration, from the fund's option-adjusted model, is 4.2. The second is a 7-year bullet bond, not callable, yielding 7.10%, with duration 5.6.

For the scenarios, use effective convexity of about -120 for the callable and about 38 for the bullet, assume yield changes happen early in the year, and weight the house view as 50% a 100 basis point cut, 35% no change and 15% a 100 basis point rise.

2Your task

Which bond gains more if yields fall 100 basis points, what is effective duration telling you, and what allocation would you run today?

Quick check

If yields fall 100 basis points, roughly how much does the callable's price rise?

Worked solution

Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.

30-second answerThe answer to give first

The bullet gains more: about 5.8% on a 100 basis point fall against about 3.6% for the callable, despite the callable's higher modified duration. Effective duration measures the bet because the issuer will call the bond if rates fall. The callable's extra 30 basis points of yield wins only if rates do not fall. With a cut-leaning view, run about 75% bullet and 25% callable: expected return 9.01%, and less to lose if the view is wrong.

Step 1Why is modified duration the wrong number for a callable bond?

A home loan borrower refinances when rates fall, so the bank that lent at 10% does not get to enjoy 10% for long when market rates drop. An issuer will call its bond when rates fall, so the bondholder's gain is capped near the call price, and only effective durationPrice sensitivity measured by revaluing the bond, option included, at yields slightly up and slightly down; it allows the cash flows to change when the option is exercised. captures that. Modified duration of 7.1 assumes the cash flows run to maturity. Effective duration of 4.2 reprices the bond with the call option, so it is the number that measures the rate bet.

Add convexity. The bullet has positive convexity, about 38, so it gains slightly more than duration says when yields fall and loses slightly less when they rise. The callable has negative convexityPrice gains shrink as yields fall and losses grow as yields rise, because the embedded call shortens the bond when that hurts the holder., about -120, because the call becomes more likely as yields fall. For a 100 basis point fall the bullet gains about 5.6 plus 0.2, 5.8%; the callable about 4.2 less 0.6, 3.6%; and modified duration would have promised 7.1%.

A call option caps the gain: the callable flattens as yields fall-10%-5%+5%+10%0-200 bp-100 bp0+100 bp+200 bpChange in yieldbullet +5.8%callable +3.6%bullet -5.4%callable -4.8%Dashed: what modified duration 7.1 would promiseRed: callable, effective duration 4.2Pine: 7-year bullet, duration 5.6
If yields fall 100 basis points the bullet gains about 5.8% and the callable only about 3.6%, far below the 7.1% its modified duration implies, because the call caps its price as yields fall; if yields rise 100 basis points the callable loses about 4.8% against 5.4% for the bullet.
Step 2What does each bond earn over a year in each scenario?

Add the yield to the price change. On a cut, the bullet earns about 12.89% and the callable 11.00%. With no change, the callable's higher yield wins, 7.40% against 7.10%. On a rise, the callable's lower effective duration loses less, 2.60% against 1.69%. The callable is a carry trade: it pays 30 basis points more for selling the issuer the right to refinance, and it wins in every scenario except the one the fund expects.

One-year return: the bullet wins on cuts, the callable on carry5%10%12.9%Bullet11.0%Callable12.4%75/25Cut 100 bp (50% likely)7.1%Bullet7.4%Callable7.2%75/25No change (35% likely)1.7%Bullet2.6%Callable1.9%75/25Rise 100 bp (15% likely)Probability-weighted: bullet 9.18%, callable 8.48%, 75/25 9.01%
The bullet earns about 12.9% if rates are cut against 11.0% for the callable, while the callable's higher yield wins with no change, 7.4% against 7.1%, and when rates rise; weighting the house view, a 75/25 mix expects 9.01%.
Step 3So what allocation would you run today?

Weight the scenarios: 50% cut, 35% no change, 15% rise. The bullet's expected return is 9.18% and the callable's 8.48%, so the view favours the bullet. Run about 75% bullet and 25% callable: expected return 9.01%, most of the cut payoff, and about 7.5 basis points of extra carry if the cuts do not come. The callable slice is a hedge on the view, not a rate bet. If the fund's conviction rose, it would shift toward the bullet; if cuts looked fully priced in today's yields, toward the callable.

State the limits. Effective duration and convexity come from a model whose volatility assumption drives the call value, so ask what volatility was used. The scenario numbers are second-order approximations that work for 100 basis point moves and drift for larger ones. And the callable's issuer credit matters: a lender's bond may carry spread risk that the government-like bullet does not.

Where candidates lose it

The common loss is reading the callable's modified duration of 7.1 and choosing it for a rate-cut view. Modified duration ignores the call; the bond will be called exactly when the view comes true, so its real sensitivity is the effective 4.2, and less as yields fall.

The second miss is ignoring carry. The callable earns more in two of three scenarios, so a candidate who calls it simply worse has not looked at the whole payoff.

What the interviewer asks next

  • Rate volatility rises sharply. What happens to the callable's price and effective duration?
  • How would you hedge the callable's negative convexity if you had to hold it?
  • At what yield pick-up would you prefer the callable even with this rate view?

Asked at Amundi, Rates, London, 2018 (Wall Street Oasis): What would your allocation be in today's market? What is effective duration?

← Case 044A fund research house must rate three funds on people, process, parent, performance and price: one cheap with an average record, one with the best 5-year return and a new manager, one with a long-serving manager and high fees. Score them with stated weights and explain the ranking.Case 046 →A draft mutual fund advertisement says Our fund returned 42% last year, with no benchmark, no standard periods and no risk statement. Rewrite it within the rules on performance advertising and explain each change.

Company names and figures are illustrative.

Fin Maverick Free CoursesExplore Free Courses
Fin Maverick BootcampsExplore Bootcamps
Fin Maverick

Finance education that ends in a job, not a certificate that gathers dust. Built for young India.

LEARN
CalculatorsFrameworksComparisonsInterview RoadmapsShowdown
RESOURCES
All CoursesFree CoursesBootcampsInternships
COMPANY
AboutJob openingPartnership
LEGAL
Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsContent LicenseReturn & Refund Policy
© 2026 FIN MAVERICK / BUILT FOR INDIA.DO FINANCE, DO NOT JUST READ ABOUT IT.