Case 061Duration and rates positioningWarm up
Omkar Salvi, in the highest tax slab, parks Rs 25 lakh for three months. A liquid fund yields 6.8% taxed at slab (assume 30%) and an arbitrage fund 6.4% taxed as short-term equity gains (assume 20%). Which leaves more after tax, and what risk does the arbitrage fund add?
1The situation
Omkar Salvi, a surgeon in the highest income tax slab, has sold a flat and will use the Rs 25 lakh as part payment on a new one in about three months. He wants the money safe, available and earning something meanwhile. His relationship manager shortlists two funds.
A liquid fund currently yields about 6.8% a year; gains are assumed to be added to income and taxed at slab, taken here as 30%. An arbitrage fund, which buys shares and sells the matching futures to earn the price gap between them, yields about 6.4%; because it counts as an equity fund for tax, short-term gains are assumed taxed at 20%. Both rates leave out surcharge and cess. Tax rules for both categories have changed in recent years; confirm the current treatment before using these numbers.
2Your task
Which fund leaves Omkar more after tax over the three months, by how much, and what does he give up for it?
Quick check
On the assumed tax rates, which fund leaves more after tax?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
On the assumed rates the arbitrage fund leaves more: about 5.12% a year after tax against 4.76%, roughly Rs 2,250 more over three months. The gain is small and comes with conditions: the arbitrage yield moves with market spreads and can fall, NAV can dip for a few days, and an exit load usually applies to early redemptions. For money that must be ready on a known date, the margin is thin enough that either fund is defensible.
Step 1Why compare after tax at all?
Two job offers paying Rs 1 lakh and Rs 95,000 a month look easy to rank until one comes with a higher tax deduction at source. For a client in the top slab, the rate of tax on a fund's gains can matter more than a few tenths of a per cent of yield. The liquid fund keeps 70% of what it earns, the arbitrage fund 80%, on the rates assumed here. That ten point difference is worth more than the 0.4 point gap in yield.
Step 2How much does it come to over three months?
| Rs, on Rs 25 lakh for three months | Liquid fund | Arbitrage fund |
|---|---|---|
| Gain before tax | 42,500 | 40,000 |
| Tax at the assumed rate | 12,750 | 8,000 |
| Kept after tax | 29,750 | 32,000 |
Rs 2,250 on Rs 25 lakh is real money but not much of it. The edge is small enough that any of three things can erase it, and a good answer names them. The breakeven is useful here: the arbitrage fund wins only while its pre-tax yield stays above 5.95%, the rate at which 80% of it equals the liquid fund's 4.76%.
Step 3What risks does the arbitrage fund add?
First, the yield is not fixed. An arbitrage fund earns the gap between a share's cash price and its futures price, and that gap shrinks when markets are calm or when many funds chase the same trades. If it drops to 5.6% for the quarter, Omkar keeps about Rs 28,000, less than the liquid fund's Rs 29,750. A liquid fund's yield moves too, but with short-term money market rates, which change more slowly.
Second, the NAV can dip. The fund marks both legs of each trade to market every day, so on a volatile day the futures price can move away from the cash price and the NAV can fall slightly before recovering at expiry. Over three months that usually washes out, but a client who must redeem on a fixed day may catch a dip. Third, arbitrage funds usually charge an exit loadA charge, as a percentage of the amount redeemed, deducted when units are sold within a set period after purchase. on redemptions within a short period, often about a month; at an assumed 0.25%, that is Rs 6,250, more than the whole after-tax advantage, if Omkar's purchase date moves forward. Confirm the load in the scheme document.
So the advice depends on how firm the date is. If the flat payment is fixed for three months or later, the arbitrage fund leaves a little more, on today's assumed rates. If the payment could come at any time, the liquid fund's daily liquidity and steadier NAV are worth the small difference. Either way, the comparison must be rerun on the client's actual slab, surcharge and the tax rules in force when he invests.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates rank the funds on pre-tax yield and pick the liquid fund, or rank them on tax alone and call the arbitrage fund clearly better. The case is about the after-tax number and how fragile the small gap between them is.
The other miss is forgetting the exit load. On a three-month horizon with a date that might move, a load can cost more than the tax advantage, and the client will remember the charge long after the yield.
What the interviewer asks next
- At what tax slab would the liquid fund leave more than the arbitrage fund?
- Why do arbitrage fund yields tend to rise when markets are volatile?
- Omkar's payment date is uncertain within the next two to five months. How would you split the money?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
