Case 019Private credit and direct lendingHard
A software company is being bought at 8x ARR with a senior loan, a mezzanine tranche and equity. Compare risk and return in each layer of the capital structure and say where you would invest and why.
1The situation
Anuvad Software sells subscription accounting software to small businesses. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) is Rs 150 crore and EBITDA Rs 30 crore, because it still spends heavily on sales. A sponsor is buying it at 8x ARR, Rs 1,200 crore, funded with a Rs 300 crore senior loan at 10% cash interest, a Rs 200 crore mezzanine loan at 6% cash plus 8% paid in kind, and Rs 700 crore of equity. The company has Rs 40 crore of cash at close.
The plan has ARR growing 20% a year and EBITDA rising to Rs 40, 52 and 66 crore over years 2 to 4, with everything refinanced or sold at the end of year 4. Two weaker cases: 12% growth with a 6x exit, and 5% growth with a 3.5x exit.
2Your task
Set out loan-to-value, cash interest cover and the return of each tranche under the three scenarios. Then pick the tranche you would invest in and defend it.
Quick check
EBITDA is Rs 30 crore in year 1 and cash interest is Rs 42 crore. What does that tell you about the structure?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
The senior sits at 25% of value for 10%, the mezzanine from 25% to 42% for about 13.4%, and the equity from 42% up for 29% in the plan but 0.09x in the bear case. Value must fall 52% before the mezzanine loses a rupee and 75% before the senior does, and both are whole even in the bear case. I would take the mezzanine: 13% with the cushion of Rs 700 crore of equity beneath it, paid in full in all three cases, while the equity's 29% depends on the multiple holding.
Step 1What is each layer's position in the stack?
Think of three people lending to a shop: the bank with a charge on the building, a relative who lends against the owner's promise and charges more, and the owner's own savings, which are the first money lost if trade fails. The senior loan is the first Rs 300 crore of Rs 1,200 crore of value, 25% loan to valueThe claim divided by the value of the business. For a tranche it is read as a band: the point in the stack where it starts and where it ends.; the mezzanine is the next Rs 200 crore, taking the band to 42%; and the Rs 700 crore of equity is everything above. Value falls from the top: the equity absorbs the first 52% of any decline, and the senior is touched only after a 75% fall, which at 8x ARR means the company selling for 2x ARR.
Step 2Can the company pay the interest?
Cash interest is 10% of Rs 300 crore plus 6% of Rs 200 crore, Rs 42 crore a year, against EBITDA of Rs 30 crore in year 1. Cover is 0.71x, 0.95x, 1.24x and 1.57x across the four years, so the first two years draw on the Rs 40 crore of opening cash and the plan only becomes self-funding in year 3. The mezzanine's 8% PIK is not generosity; it is the recognition that the company cannot pay 14% in cash, and it means the mezzanine claim grows to Rs 272 crore by year 4. A lender who values this deal on ARR cover alone has not looked at the cash.
Step 3What does each tranche make in each scenario?
| Scenario at year 4 | ARR | EV | Senior recovers | Mezz recovers, IRR | Equity, MOIC, IRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan: 20% growth, 8x ARR | 311 | 2,488 | 300 (100%) | 272, 13.4% | 1916, 2.74x, 28.6% |
| Slower: 12% growth, 6x ARR | 236 | 1,416 | 300 (100%) | 272, 13.4% | 844, 1.21x, 4.8% |
| Bear: 5% growth, 3.5x ARR | 182 | 638 | 300 (100%) | 272, 13.4% | 66, 0.09x, -44.6% |
Step 4So where would you invest?
The mezzanine, and say why in terms of the two numbers that matter. It earns about 13% a year with Rs 700 crore of someone else's money beneath it, and it is repaid in full unless the company is worth less than about 3.8x its current ARR in year 4, which even the bear case clears. The senior is safer still but 10% is thin pay for a loan whose cash interest is not covered until year 3. The equity's 29% in the plan is attractive, but it is a bet that 8x ARR holds for four years; at 6x and 12% growth it makes 1.21x and at 3.5x it loses nearly all of it. The limit of the answer is the entry price: at 8x ARR the whole stack rests on the market continuing to pay for recurring revenue, and a mezzanine investor should ask for a lower entry multiple, tighter PIK terms or a slice of the equity before being comfortable.
Where candidates lose it
The usual loss is picking the equity because its plan IRR is highest, without pricing the bear case. The question is about the trade between return and position in the stack; a tranche that is paid in full at 3.5x ARR for 14% is the answer a credit interviewer is waiting for.
The second miss is reading loan-to-value and stopping. A software deal at 8x ARR has thin cash interest cover in the early years, and the PIK element of the mezzanine is the clue that the cash is not there yet.
What the interviewer asks next
- The sponsor offers the mezzanine 2% of the equity as a warrant. How does that change the comparison?
- ARR churn rises from 8% to 15% a year. Which tranche feels it first, and how?
- Would your answer change if the entry multiple were 5x ARR with the same debt?
Asked at HPS Investment Partners, Credit, New York, 2021 (Wall Street Oasis): say we were looking at a software company. where would you invest in the capital structure and why?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
