Case 048Distressed and special situationsHard
Debt-for-equity restructuring: a shipyard owes Rs 1,200 crore on Rs 100 crore of EBITDA. Lenders cut debt to 4x and take 70% of the equity, with enterprise value at 7x. What do the lenders recover in debt and equity, and what do the old shareholders keep?
1The situation
Dhanush Shipyards builds offshore support vessels and harbour tugs. A run of fixed-price contracts that overran left it with Rs 1,200 crore of bank debt on Rs 100 crore of EBITDA, 12x. It cannot pay interest. The lenders, all ranking equally, agree an out-of-court restructuring: debt is cut to 4x EBITDA, Rs 400 crore, and the rest of their claims is exchanged for 70% of the equity. The old shareholders, the founding family, keep 30% and agree not to contest the deal.
The lenders' adviser values the business at 7x EBITDA, Rs 700 crore. A court-led process is the alternative; the adviser expects it to take two years, lose order inflow and cut value to about Rs 600 crore, with Rs 20 crore of costs. Insolvency rules and priority differ by jurisdiction and change; confirm the framework that applies before relying on the court comparison.
2Your task
Work the new capital structure, each lender's recovery in debt and equity, what the old shareholders keep, and why the lenders accept giving them anything.
Quick check
Lenders get Rs 400 crore of new debt plus 70% of the equity. What is their recovery on Rs 1,200 crore?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Lenders recover about 50.8%: Rs 400 crore of new debt plus Rs 210 crore of equity on Rs 1,200 crore owed. At 7x the business is worth Rs 700 crore, so after Rs 400 crore of debt the equity is worth Rs 300 crore, 70% to lenders and Rs 90 crore to the old shareholders. Lenders give up 7.5 points against strict priority to avoid a court route worth 48.3%. Their recovery depends on what the equity is really worth.
Step 1What does the restructuring actually do?
A family that cannot pay a Rs 12 lakh loan on a shop worth Rs 7 lakh can let the bank seize and sell it, or agree that the bank keeps a smaller loan and takes a share of the shop. A debt-for-equity swap converts the debt the business cannot carry into ownership, so the lenders swap a claim that will not be paid for a share of the value that does exist. Rs 1,200 crore of debt against Rs 700 crore of value is Rs 500 crore that cannot be repaid by anyone. After the swap, the company owes Rs 400 crore, 4x EBITDA, which it can service, and the equity is worth Rs 300 crore.
Step 2What does each lender recover?
Work it per Rs 100 of claim, because lenders rank equally. Each Rs 100 of old debt becomes Rs 33.3 of new debt and a share of the equity worth Rs 17.5, a recovery of Rs 50.8, or 50.8%. The debt part is a contractual claim; the equity part is a valuation. A bank that holds Rs 300 crore of the old loans walks away with Rs 100 crore of new loans and 17.5% of the company, and must decide whether to hold the shares or sell them, usually at a discount, to a special situations fund.
| Holder | Claim before | New debt | Equity share | Equity value at 7x | Total | Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenders | 1,200 | 400 | 70% | 210 | 610 | 50.8% |
| Old shareholders | 30% | 90 | 90 | |||
| Total | 1,200 | 400 | 100% | 300 | 700 |
Step 3Why do lenders let the old shareholders keep 30%?
Under strict priority they would not. The lenders are owed more than the business is worth, so in a court-led process they would take all the equity and recover Rs 700 crore, 58.3%. Giving the family Rs 90 crore costs the lenders 7.5 points of recovery, and they pay it because the court route is worse: two years, lost orders, value down to Rs 600 crore and Rs 20 crore of costs, 48.3%. The family's consent, its relationships with naval and port customers, and the speed of an out-of-court deal are worth more to the lenders than the 30%. That is the arithmetic of most consensual restructurings: junior holders keep something because their cooperation preserves value.
Then the risk the lenders keep. Recovery depends on the value of the equity: at 6x it falls to 45%, at 8x it rises to 57%, and every turn of EBITDA multiple moves it by about 6 points. A lender who expects the shipbuilding cycle to turn should hold the shares; one who needs to clean its books should sell them. And 4x of new debt is only sustainable if the overrun contracts are finished; the first question in diligence is how much of the order book is still fixed price.
Where candidates lose it
The usual loss is reporting recovery as the new debt alone, 33%, or as 100% because lenders now own most of the company. Recovery is the new debt plus the value of the equity received, and that value is an estimate.
The second miss is treating the family's 30% as a mistake. It is the price of an out-of-court deal, and the right comparison is the court route, not strict priority on paper.
What the interviewer asks next
- The lenders split into secured and unsecured. How should the 70% be shared between them?
- How would you value the new equity if the order book is half fixed-price contracts?
- Why might lenders prefer warrants over ordinary shares for part of their recovery?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
