Private Equity interview preparation

Questions

100

Traced to a firm

83

Firms

40

Updated

September 2026

Asked at

All firmsAdvent International6Apollo Global Management6Audax Group6Carlyle Group6EQT6Silver Lake6Vista Equity Partners6WPWarburg Pincus6HIH.I.G. Capital5Oaktree Capital Management5Platinum Equity5TPTPG5General Atlantic4AMAres Management3Blackstone3Clayton Dubilier and Rice3GSGuggenheim Securities3Insight Partners3Invesco3Lazard3Neuberger Berman3NUNuveen3TSTruist Securities3Bain Capital2HWHarris Williams2Kohlberg Kravis Roberts2Millennium Management2Moody's2Rothschild & Co2WBWilliam Blair2Bessemer Venture Partners1Citi1Evercore1FTFranklin Templeton1Houlihan Lokey1HPS Investment Partners1KKR1Mizuho1MSMorgan Stanley1Sycamore Partners1

Topic

All topicsLBO mechanics7Value creation5Returns2Fund economics9Investment judgement18Valuation6Firm knowledge2Credit and financing9Operations4Due diligence8Career and fit11Sector knowledge4Accounting2Deal structuring7Industry knowledge3Brainteasers3

Level

AnyCoreIntermediateHard

Type

AnyTechnicalCaseFitMarket viewBrainteaser

1. 007What makes a good LBO candidate?Investment judgementCorefirst roundWPWarburg PincusPrivate Equity · San Francisco · 2014Clayton Dubilier and RicePrivate Equity · London · 2026GSGuggenheim SecuritiesHealthcare · London · 2026

   Say this

   Predictable cash flow that can service debt, low capital intensity, a defensible market position, a clear operational improvement to make, and a credible exit. Stability matters more than growth.

   Then walk it

   1. Cash flow stability first, because debt service is non-negotiable. Contracted or recurring revenue, low cyclicality, sticky customers, and a demonstrated ability to hold margin through a downturn.
   2. Low maintenance CapEx, since every dollar spent on the asset base is a dollar not repaying debt.
   3. Defensible position: switching costs, scale, regulation, brand. Something that protects margin for the five years you own it without requiring you to outspend competitors.
   4. An identifiable value creation lever: an underinvested commercial function, a bloated cost base, a fragmented sector supporting a buy-and-build, or a non-core division to divest.
   5. A real exit. A deep strategic buyer list, or a listed peer group at a decent multiple. The best entry price is worthless if nobody will buy it from you in five years.
   6. And the anti-candidate, which is worth naming: high-growth, cash-burning, cyclical, capital-heavy. That can be an excellent investment and a terrible LBO, and knowing the difference is the point of the question.

   Where candidates lose it

   Putting high growth near the top. Growth consumes cash and cash service is the binding constraint. Saying that venture-style growth is the opposite of what an LBO structure wants shows you understand why the structure exists.

   Expect next

   • Pitch me a company that would be a great LBO candidate.
   • Why is high growth not necessarily good?
   • Would you invest in a company with negative sales growth?

   Reported by candidates at Warburg Pincus (Private Equity, San Francisco, 2014); Clayton Dubilier and Rice (Private Equity, London, 2026); Guggenheim Securities (Healthcare, London, 2026). Source: Wall Street Oasis.

2. 031What are the ways a sponsor can exit an investment?Investment judgementCorefirst round

   Say this

   Sale to a strategic buyer, sale to another sponsor, an IPO, a recapitalisation, or a continuation vehicle. Strategic sales usually price best; sponsor-to-sponsor is the most common in practice.

   Then walk it

   1. Strategic sale: typically the highest price because the buyer captures synergies, but the process is slower, antitrust review is possible, and the buyer universe can be thin.
   2. Secondary buyout, selling to another sponsor: fast, familiar counterparties, and a clean exit. It is now a large share of all exits, though limited partners sometimes note they are effectively buying the same asset twice.
   3. IPO: can achieve a good valuation in the right window but rarely gives a full exit. The sponsor retains a stake subject to lock-up and then sells down over years, so it is a path to exit rather than an exit.
   4. Dividend recapitalisation: returns capital without selling, used when the exit market is closed.
   5. Continuation vehicle: the sponsor moves the asset into a new fund it also manages, with existing limited partners choosing to cash out or roll. Useful for a good asset the fund has run out of time to hold, and structurally conflicted, which is why pricing has to be validated by a new third-party investor.
   6. The choice depends on the asset, the market window and the fund's own timing. A fund near the end of its life has less optionality, which is itself a negotiating weakness.

   Where candidates lose it

   Forgetting continuation vehicles, which have become a major feature of the market. And describing an IPO as a full exit, which it is not.

   Expect next

   • What is a continuation vehicle and what is the conflict?
   • Why has sponsor-to-sponsor become so common?
   • How does fund life affect exit decisions?

Firm tags come from public, anonymous candidate reports on Wall Street Oasis: strong signal, not sworn testimony. Firms are named as the places a question was reported, not as partners of Fin Maverick. Answers are written for this page to show how to think out loud; they are not scripts to recite.