Case 092Goal and retirement planningHard
A couple, both 45, want to retire now on Rs 1.5 lakh a month from a Rs 4 crore corpus. Test a 45-year horizon at a 4.5% initial withdrawal rate, then stress it with a 30% market fall in year one.
1The situation
Rohan and Tara Advaney are both 45, own their home, have no children and want to stop working now. They have Rs 4 crore invested and want Rs 1.5 lakh a month, Rs 18 lakh a year, rising with prices. That is a 4.5% initial withdrawal rate, and it has to last until at least age 90, a 45-year horizon.
Use illustrative figures: the portfolio earns 10% a year on average, inflation is 6%, and each year's withdrawal is taken at the start of the year. For the stress test, the first year's return is -30% instead of +10%, with 10% every year after.
2Your task
Does the plan last 45 years, what does an early fall do to it, and what would it take to make it robust?
Quick check
After a 30% fall in year one, with average returns every year after, roughly when does the money run out?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
On average returns the plan only just lasts, running dry in year 45, and a 30% fall in year one breaks it: the money runs out around age 65. A 4.5% start leaves no margin over 45 years at a 4% real return. Neither a 15% spending cut nor ten years of part-time income repairs the early-crash case alone; together they do. The honest advice is to plan for both before stopping work, or to work a few more years.
Step 1Why is 4.5% tight over 45 years when it sounds modest?
Because the horizon is twice a normal retirement. A tank that leaks slowly lasts a weekend trip but not a month on the road. With 10% returns and 6% inflation the real return is about 3.8%, and a withdrawal that starts at 4.5% of the corpus and rises with prices consumes the whole Rs 4 crore in about 44 years even if nothing goes wrong. That base case already fails the brief by a year. Everything after that is about how little room there is.
Step 2What does a fall in year one do that a fall in year thirty does not?
It hits the corpus when it is largest relative to what is left to spend, and the withdrawals do not pause. After taking Rs 18 lakh and losing 30%, the Rs 4 crore is about Rs 2.67 crore, and the next withdrawal is already Rs 19.1 lakh. This is sequence riskThe risk that poor returns arrive early in a withdrawal phase, when losses compound with withdrawals and cannot be recovered by later good years.: the same average return delivers a different outcome depending on the order, and here it moves the end date from age 89 to about 65. The same fall in year thirty, on a large grown corpus, would barely register.
| Age | Withdrawal, Rs lakh | Base corpus, Rs crore | Early-fall corpus, Rs crore |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 18.0 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| 46 | 19.1 | 4.20 | 2.67 |
| 50 | 24.1 | 5.09 | 2.86 |
| 55 | 32.2 | 6.40 | 2.80 |
| 60 | 43.1 | 7.89 | 2.09 |
| 65 | 57.7 | 9.48 | 0.14 |
Step 3What would make the plan robust?
Test the levers one at a time, then together. Cutting spending 15% for good stretches the early-fall case to 25 years; earning Rs 12 lakh a year, in today's money, from part-time work for the first ten years stretches it to 34; doing both lasts the full 45 years with money left over. The work income matters more than the cut, because it arrives exactly when the corpus is smallest. Another route is simply to keep working: five more years of saving at 50 roughly doubles the corpus and holds even with the fall.
Close with the view you would give them. The plan works only if nothing goes wrong early, so it is not yet a plan to retire on. Before they stop, agree a written rule: if the portfolio falls more than 20% in the first five years, spending drops 15% and one of them takes paid work until it recovers. Hold two years of spending in cash and short debt so the first withdrawals never come from a fallen equity market. State the limits: 10% returns and 6% inflation are assumptions, and a real sequence can be worse than one bad year.
Where candidates lose it
Candidates quote a rule of thumb, 4% is safe, and pass the plan. That rule was built around a thirty-year retirement; stretched to 45 years at these assumptions, even the average case runs out.
The second miss is testing the crash with an average return. A 30% fall averaged into 45 years looks like a small dent; placed in year one, it takes about 24 years off the plan.
What the interviewer asks next
- What withdrawal rate would last 45 years even with the early fall, on the same assumptions?
- How would a rule of cutting spending after bad years change the numbers?
- Would you move them to a more conservative portfolio to reduce the crash, and what does that cost in the base case?
Company names and figures are illustrative.
