Fin Maverick
Foundations VocabularyAccounting & ReportingEconomics & MacroQuant Methods & ProgrammingBusiness & Company AnalysisCorporate Finance & ValuationBehavioural Finance
Banking & Market InfrastructureFixed Income & RatesDerivatives & Structured ProductsPublic EquitiesTransactions & DealsPortfolio ConstructionFunds & AMCs
Private Markets & AlternativesRisk, Treasury & ControlAI & Digital FinanceStochastic Calculus & PricingWealth & Personal FinanceIndian Markets & RegulationProfessional Practice
CalculatorComparison
Frameworks
Explore Bootcamps
Equity ResearchPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund MasteryInvestment Banking Analyst
Private Equity AnalystQuant & Hedge Fund AnalystBreaking Into VCFinancial Analyst Program
Risk Management ProgramPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsDerivatives Foundation
Explore Free Courses

Equity Research6

Writing an Investment ThesisBuilding a Discounted Cash FlowReading an Annual Report FastReading a Sector Before a CompanySpotting Quality of Earnings Red FlagsBuilding a Revenue Forecast From Drivers

Portfolio Management3

Rebalancing: When, Why and What It CostsStrategic and Tactical Asset AllocationMeasuring Risk in a Portfolio

Mutual Fund Mastery3

Comparing Funds Without Being FooledHow a NAV Is Struck and Which Day You GetReading a Fund Factsheet Properly

Derivatives Unlocked4

Hedging a Real ExposureThe Greeks, PracticallyFutures, the Basis and What Moves ItReading an Option Payoff

AI For Finance2

Retrieval and Grounding for FinanceDocument Extraction in Finance

Breaking Into Quants4

Backtesting a StrategyHypothesis TestingCleaning Financial DataRegression for Finance

Breaking Into VC3

Sizing a MarketReading a Term Sheet as a FounderHow a Venture Round Actually Works

Financial Analyst Program4

Common Size and Trend AnalysisReading a Cash Flow StatementRatio Analysis That Says SomethingBuilding a Working Capital Schedule

Risk Management Program2

Credit Exposure and How It Is ReducedValue at Risk and What It Hides

Investment Banking Analyst3

Precedent Transactions and Why They DifferReading a Term Sheet StructurallyBuilding a Comparable Companies Table

Private Wealth Management3

Tax Aware Portfolio DecisionsBuilding a Client Risk ProfileGoal Based Planning Arithmetic

Debt Capital Markets3

Analysing an Issuer's CreditDuration and What It Does Not Tell YouBond Pricing and Yield Mechanics

Private Equity Analyst2

Fund Waterfalls and CarryThe LBO in Structure

Hedge Funds Analyst2

Short Selling MechanicsLong Short Mechanics
QuarksCourses
Explore Interview Preparation
Investment BankingEquity ResearchVenture CapitalistPrivate EquityHedge Funds
QuantFinancial AnalysisPrivate Wealth ManagementDebt Capital MarketsRisk Management
Derivatives FoundationPortfolio ManagementMutual Fund Mastery
PartnershipsShowdown
Log inSign up
Interview tracksAll
1Investment Banking
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
2Equity Research
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
3Venture Capital
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
4Private Equity
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
5Hedge Funds
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
6Quant
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
7Financial Analysis
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
8Private Wealth Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
9Debt Capital Markets
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
10Risk Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
11Derivatives Foundation
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
12Portfolio Management
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
13Mutual Fund Mastery
Question bankPuzzlesCase studies
019

Case 019Fund economics and LP mathsCore

Vanshvik Family Office committed Rs 50 crore to a venture fund. Given the capital calls, distributions and reported NAVs, draw its J-curve and compute DPI, TVPI and IRR at years 5, 8 and 10.

1The situation

Vanshvik Family Office committed Rs 50 crore to a ten-year venture fund. The fund called Rs 12, 12, 10, 8, 4 and 4 crore at the end of years 1 to 6. It distributed Rs 5, 15, 40, 35 and 25 crore at the end of years 6 to 10, when it wound up.

The fund reported the value of Vanshvik's remaining interest, its NAV, at Rs 38 crore at the end of year 5 and Rs 70 crore at the end of year 8. Treat all flows as happening at year ends.

2Your task

Draw the cumulative net cash curve, and compute DPI, TVPI and IRR at years 5, 8 and 10. What should Vanshvik take from the comparison?

Quick check

At the end of year 8, what are DPI and TVPI?

Worked solution

Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.

30-second answerThe answer to give first

At year 5 DPI is zero and TVPI 0.83x; at year 8 DPI 1.2x and TVPI 2.6x; at year 10 both are 2.4x, an IRR of about 16%. The curve bottoms at minus Rs 46 crore in year 5 and turns positive in year 8. TVPI at year 8 was higher than the final result, because the Rs 70 crore NAV became Rs 60 crore of cash. Only DPI is money in the bank.

Step 1Why does an LP's cash curve look like a J?

Planting a mango orchard means years of buying saplings, fertiliser and water before the first crop. Your bank balance falls, flattens, and only then climbs. A venture fund calls money for its first five or six years and returns it only as companies are sold, so the LP's cumulative cash dips deep before it rises: the J-curve. Vanshvik's cumulative net cash falls to minus Rs 46 crore by year 5, is still minus Rs 30 crore in year 7, and only turns positive in year 8.

Vanshvik's cumulative net cash in the fund: the J-curve, Rs crore-40-20+20+40+600Year 5: DPI 0.00x, TVPI 0.83xYear 8: DPI 1.20x, TVPI 2.60xYear 10: DPI = TVPI = 2.40x012345678910Year of the fundThe year-8 NAV of Rs 70 crore turned into Rs 60 crore of cash, so the 2.60x TVPI at year 8 overstated the 2.40x finally received.
Vanshvik's cumulative net cash falls to minus Rs 46 crore by year 5 and recovers to plus Rs 70 crore by year 10, while DPI stays at zero until the first distribution in year 6 and the year-8 TVPI of 2.60x ends up above the final 2.40x.
Step 2How do DPI, TVPI and IRR differ at each point?

DPIDistributions to paid-in capital: cash the LP has received back, divided by the money it has paid in. It counts only realised money. counts cash back. TVPITotal value to paid-in capital: cash received plus the reported value still held, divided by money paid in. adds the NAV still held. At year 5, Rs 46 crore has been paid in and nothing returned: DPI 0, TVPI Rs 38 crore over 46, 0.83x. At the bottom of the J the fund is reporting less than the money put in, which is normal: fees and early write-offs arrive before the winners are sold. The IRR to that point, treating NAV as if it were cash, is -7.8%.

End of yearPaid inDistributedNAVDPITVPIIRR
5460380.00x0.83x-7.8%
85060701.20x2.60x20.4%
105012002.40x2.40x16.5%
Rs crore. TVPI rises from 0.83x at year 5 to 2.60x at year 8 and settles at 2.40x at year 10, when all value is cash and DPI equals TVPI; the IRR at years 5 and 8 treats the NAV as if it were received that year.

At year 8 all Rs 50 crore has been called and Rs 60 crore returned: DPI 1.2x. With the Rs 70 crore NAV, TVPI is 2.6x and the IRR 20.4%. At year 10 the fund has wound up, Rs 120 crore has come back, and DPI and TVPI are both 2.4x, with a final IRR of 16.5%.

Step 3What should the family office take from it?

Compare year 8 with year 10. The fund said its remaining holdings were worth Rs 70 crore; they produced Rs 60 crore. TVPI at year 8 overstated the final outcome by 0.2x, because NAV is the manager's estimate and the last companies are often the hardest to sell. That is why experienced LPs weight DPI more heavily as a fund ages, and why a fund raising its next vehicle on a high TVPI and a low DPI gets harder questions. The IRR also fell from 20% to 16% as the late, smaller distributions arrived.

One more lesson is about liquidity rather than return. Vanshvik had to keep Rs 50 crore ready to meet calls at short notice for six years, while its money was out for a long time before any came back. A family office planning its other commitments needs the shape of this curve, not just the final multiple.

Where candidates lose it

The usual loss is computing TVPI on the full commitment instead of paid-in capital. At year 5 only Rs 46 crore has been called, so TVPI is 38 over 46, not 38 over 50.

The second is treating a year-8 TVPI as the answer. NAV is an estimate; the final result can be lower, as it is here, and DPI is the only metric that cannot be revised.

What the interviewer asks next

  • The year-8 NAV had been Rs 90 crore and the fund still returned Rs 60 crore after year 8. How should Vanshvik read the manager's marks next time?
  • Why do LPs often look at a fund's IRR and multiple together rather than either alone?
  • How would a subscription credit line that delays capital calls change the reported IRR?
← Case 018Tiffinvik Meals has Rs 36 crore of cash and loses money every month, but revenue grows 6% a month. Is it default alive, and what is the slowest growth that keeps it alive?Case 020 →How would you evaluate a company riding a trend? Pawvik Petcare grew revenue from Rs 40 crore to Rs 58 crore while its market grew 30%. How much of the growth is the trend, how much the company, and what happens if the market slows?

Company names and figures are illustrative.

Fin Maverick Free CoursesExplore Free Courses
Fin Maverick BootcampsExplore Bootcamps
Fin Maverick

Finance education that ends in a job, not a certificate that gathers dust. Built for young India.

LEARN
CalculatorsFrameworksComparisonsInterview RoadmapsShowdown
RESOURCES
All CoursesFree CoursesBootcampsInternships
COMPANY
AboutJob openingPartnership
LEGAL
Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsContent LicenseReturn & Refund Policy
© 2026 FIN MAVERICK / BUILT FOR INDIA.DO FINANCE, DO NOT JUST READ ABOUT IT.