Case 057Market sizing and thesesCore
Is Bhandarvik Retail Software selling into the right market? Compare its three store segments on reachable revenue and payback, and say which one it should own first.
1The situation
Bhandarvik Retail Software sells inventory software to small stores through a field sales team, and today it sells to everyone who will buy. It has data on three segments from its first year.
Pharmacies: 8 lakh stores, Rs 900 a month, a 6% win rate when a salesperson visits, and Rs 9,000 of field sales cost per win. Hardware stores: 5 lakh stores, Rs 700 a month, a 3% win rate, Rs 12,000 per win. Apparel stores: 3 lakh stores, Rs 1,500 a month, a 2% win rate, Rs 20,000 per win. Assume the win rates hold as the team covers each segment once.
2Your task
Which segment should Bhandarvik own first, and what would make you change that view?
Quick check
Apparel stores pay the most per month. Which segment gives the most reachable ARR?
Worked solution
Try it on paper, then open one step at a time.
30-second answerThe answer to give first
Pharmacies: about Rs 52 crore of reachable ARR with a 10-month payback, several times either alternative on both counts. Hardware stores offer Rs 12.6 crore at 17.1 months and apparel Rs 10.8 crore at 13.3 months. Apparel looks attractive on price and on total market, but a 2% win rate says the product does not yet fit that buyer. Own pharmacies, and change the view only if the apparel win rate rises.
Step 1What does the right market mean for a company this early?
A new restaurant that tries to serve North Indian, Chinese and continental to everyone usually serves all three badly; the one that owns one cuisine on one street builds a queue first. For an early software company, the right market is the segment where it wins most often, earns back its sales cost fastest and still has room to grow, not the one with the biggest headline. The three tests you need are reachable revenue, payback on sales cost, and the full market behind each, and the data in the case gives all three.
Step 2How do the three segments compare on reachable revenue and payback?
Reachable ARR is the number of stores, times the win rate, times the annual price. Pharmacies give 48,000 wins and Rs 51.84 crore of ARR; hardware gives 15,000 wins and Rs 12.6 crore; apparel gives 6,000 wins and Rs 10.8 crore. Payback is the cost per win over the monthly price: Rs 9,000 over Rs 900 is 10 months for pharmacies, against 17.1 for hardware and 13.3 for apparel. The case gives no gross margin; at an assumed 80%, the paybacks stretch to 12.5, 21.4 and 16.7 months, and the ranking is unchanged.
| Segment | Full market, Rs crore ARR | Wins at today's rate | Reachable ARR, Rs crore | Sales spend, Rs crore | Payback, months |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacies | 864 | 48,000 | 51.84 | 43.2 | 10.0 |
| Hardware stores | 420 | 15,000 | 12.60 | 18.0 | 17.1 |
| Apparel stores | 540 | 6,000 | 10.80 | 12.0 | 13.3 |
Step 3Why not chase apparel, the highest price?
Because the win rate is the market speaking. A 2% win rate against 6% in pharmacies says apparel stores do not yet see enough value in this product, and a higher price does not fix that. Apparel inventory runs on sizes, colours and seasons, which a tool built around batch numbers and expiry dates may handle poorly. The full apparel market, Rs 540 crore of ARR if every store bought, is a reason to come back later with a better product, not a reason to spend Rs 20,000 per win now. Pharmacies also have a reason to buy that the others lack: expiry tracking saves stock that would otherwise be written off.
Step 4What would change your view?
Two things, each a number you would ask for. First, churn by segment: a 10-month payback is only good if pharmacies stay well beyond 10 months, and small stores close often. Second, the win-rate trend: if apparel's win rate rose from 2% to 6% after a product fix, its reachable ARR would triple to Rs 32.4 crore and its payback per win would fall as visits convert more often. The judgement for the partner: the company is in the right market only in pharmacies today; it should focus its field team there, and treat apparel as a product bet with a measurable trigger. The limitation is that win rates measured in a first year often come from the most eager stores, so expect them to fall as coverage widens.
Where candidates lose it
The usual miss is ranking segments by store count or price, the inputs to a top-down market size, and picking apparel or pharmacies for the wrong reason. Reachable revenue multiplies in the win rate, and that is where the segments separate.
The second is quoting the full market as the opportunity. Rs 864 crore of pharmacy ARR exists only if every pharmacy buys; at a 6% win rate the company reaches a small fraction of it, which is still the best of the three.
What the interviewer asks next
- The pharmacy win rate halves once the eager stores are signed. Is pharmacies still the right first market?
- How would you size the pharmacy segment bottom-up for a pitch deck?
- What would make you back a company that insists on selling to all three segments at once?
Asked at Insight Partners, Leveraged Buyouts, New York, 2022 (Wall Street Oasis): Whether you believe the markets they are playing in are the correct ones
Company names and figures are illustrative.
